Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Panel: GA Checks Should Have Been Cleared By Feds
AP ^ | Greg Bluestein

Posted on 10/29/2008 2:08:01 PM PDT by steve-b

Georgia should have sought U.S. Justice Department approval before implementing a new process of using Social Security numbers and driver's license data to check voters' immigration status, a three-judge federal panel ruled Monday.

The 27-page ruling ordered Georgia election officials to make "diligent and immediate" efforts to notify voters flagged as ineligible because of the checks that they can still cast paper ballots on Nov. 4. The paper ballots can later be challenged by state officials if a voter is believed to be ineligible.

The state also is not allowed to remove names from lists unless voters say in writing that they are ineligible....

(Excerpt) Read more at ap.google.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: aliens; votefraud; voting

1 posted on 10/29/2008 2:08:03 PM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Reconstruction lives on.


2 posted on 10/29/2008 2:13:23 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Detroit - Cleveland without the glitter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Georgia should have sought U.S. Justice Department approval

WTF? The SAME “justice” department that is TOTALLY IGNORING what is going on in Ohio?

3 posted on 10/29/2008 2:13:36 PM PDT by bfh333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bfh333

DOJ hasn’t been worth anything since Ashcroft left! They come in less then a week before the election with this ruling and now put a burden of proof on GA.

Where is Bush calling for a thorough investigation of ACORN fraud?


4 posted on 10/29/2008 2:16:11 PM PDT by PhiKapMom ( BOOMER SOONER -- VOTE FOR McCAIN/PALIN2008! LetsGetThisRight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Georgia is one of several states that needs federal approval before changing election policy because of a history of discriminatory voting practices.

Oh, so what states have this special requirement and what states can do what they want without asking permission?

You think PA or Ohio have to ask permission?

5 posted on 10/29/2008 2:34:23 PM PDT by Vortex (Garbage In, Garbage Out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

This stuff pisses me off to no end.

The leftists here in GA have worked so hard to keep pounding at the progress made here to stop voter fraud.

Oh, so we can’t check to see if they are citizens? Why? That makes no sense. That and the early voting scam are really grating.


6 posted on 10/29/2008 2:38:32 PM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/voting/intro/intro_b.php

Introduction To Federal Voting Rights Laws
The Voting Rights Act, adopted initially in 1965 and extended in 1970, 1975, and 1982, is generally considered the most successful piece of civil rights legislation ever adopted by the United States Congress. The Act codifies and effectuates the 15th Amendment’s permanent guarantee that, throughout the nation, no person shall be denied the right to vote on account of race or color. In addition, the Act contains several special provisions that impose even more stringent requirements in certain jurisdictions throughout the country.

Adopted at a time when African Americans were substantially disfranchised in many Southern states, the Act employed measures to restore the right to vote that intruded in matters previously reserved to the individual states. Section 4 ended the use of literacy requirements for voting in six Southern states (Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Virginia) and in many counties of North Carolina, where voter registration or turnout in the 1964 presidential election was less than 50 percent of the voting-age population. Under the terms of Section 5 of the Act, no voting changes were legally enforceable in these jurisdictions until approved either by a three-judge court in the District of Columbia or by the Attorney General of the United States. Other sections authorized the Attorney General to appoint federal voting examiners who could be sent into covered jurisdictions to ensure that legally qualified persons were free to register for federal, state, and local elections, or to assign federal observers to oversee the conduct of elections.

(snip)


Yeah, we have to ask “Mommy may I?”


7 posted on 10/29/2008 2:40:37 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights (Stand Up Chuck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Last year there was a big media campaign advising voters about the requirements which are within federal guidlines.

Herman Caine and the SOS devoted one night’s programming. There is just no excuse, especially since GA was bending over backwards to make sure everyone eligible was registered.

My hunch is the ass from Cherokee County that filed this suit timed it as a matter of design.


8 posted on 10/29/2008 2:47:28 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights (Stand Up Chuck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
In our little Gulfside county in north Fl, we used to have five at large commissioners. With only 15,000 population and maybe 10,000 voters, it made sense.

Thirty years ago, the NAACP sued the county and the DOJ forced us to go to single member districts so that there would be a black commissioner. He has been commissioner ever since

Each commissioner represents at most 2,000 voters and looks out only for their own, narrow interests.

Despite gorgeous beaches, a deep water port, we still have 15,000 population due to awful government wrought upon us by the so-called civil rights act, the NAACP and DOJ.

9 posted on 10/29/2008 2:53:50 PM PDT by Jacquerie (All Muslims are suspect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Vortex

PA & Ohio weren’t Jim Crow states


10 posted on 10/29/2008 2:54:24 PM PDT by houston1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Where is Bush calling for a thorough investigation of ACORN fraud?

When has Bush ever called for a thorough investigation of fraud by the dems?

11 posted on 10/29/2008 2:54:29 PM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: houston1
PA & Ohio weren’t Jim Crow states

Not the point.

Equal application of the Law is the point, not singling out some states over others.

If we need oversight by the federal government for this, then all states should have the same requirements.

12 posted on 10/29/2008 5:14:23 PM PDT by Vortex (Garbage In, Garbage Out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bfh333

>>WTF? The SAME “justice” department that is TOTALLY IGNORING what is going on in Ohio?<<

Including Ohio state employeees using state computers to try to dig up dirt on Joe the Plumber.


13 posted on 10/30/2008 5:23:05 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (I want to "Buy American" but the only things for sale made in the USA are politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson