You have to enforce it. Good luck.
Just remember.
“One man with courage makes a majority.”
I’m not going to tell the 264 pound dude that he can’t vote 7 times. Neither will the DOJ apparently.
I’m glad to see this is getting play in the media but it’s probably a bit too late. It was a brilliant move by Obama to have judge Surrick wait as long as he did. I’m afraid the fix is in.
Q: Who enforces the Constitutional requirments for the Presidency?
A: The Electoral College.
Note: If they have the guts.
I agree with Fitzgibbons’ analysis. The Federal Courts have the power to hear and decide the case if they want to.
All it will take as one courageous judge.
I'm sure the judge did his very best, and considered carefully and with all due diligence what the most plausible sounding line of total bull would best obscure his open defiance of the rule of law.
Speaking of Berg, didn’t he claim last week on Michael Savage’s program that he was going to release a tape recording of zero’s paternal grandmother admitting that zero was born in Kenya and that she had witnessed it?
Is Berg leading us on, or does he really have such a recording?
“Who Enforces the Constitution’s Natural Born Citizen Clause?”
Evidently, no one.
But then, it’s just as evident that no one bothers to read the constitution anymore, and few in America seem to care very much. The world’s first and greatest experiment in republican government is being allowed to slide down the crapper by those whose freedom was purchased with the blood of countless patriots. The entire thing is utterly disgusting.
When 0 decides to ‘’redistribute’’ ‘’steal’’ 80% of the judges wealth, will he have any ‘’standing’’ to bit-h or just shut up?
2. Any party to a CONTRACT has standing to enforce it. This is as basic as it gets. Contract Law 101. First week of law school stuff. And it seems that lawyers and judges all over the country have forgotten all about it. Also, the Constitution was intended to benefit all American citizens, We, The People, and in basic contract law the intended beneficiaries of a CONTRACT, i.e., us, also have standing to enforce it.
3. If We, The People, do not have standing to enforce the CONTRACT, the U.S. Constitution, then it is unenforceable, and if it is unenforceable it is just a historic curiosity that means nothing. It’s just an old piece of parchment. But that was not the intent, and to give intent to the CONTRACT it must be enforceable by its parties and beneficiaries.
4. We, The People, have standing under the First Amendment "to petition the government for redress of grievances." If we have a grievance that a non-citizen, illegal alien, is running for president, I think the First Amendment unequivocally gives every American citizen standing to sue the government to redress that grievance and enforce the Constitution.
The above is from this article Family Security Matters
As a courageous conservative on a flaming-liberal BB once asked a swarm of attacking gaybots, "Just who do you have to be, to say 'should'?"
And just who do we have to be, to claim our rights?
The judge's order might better read: "You're not big enough. Get lost."
There is NO JUSTICE in our Justice System anymore.......our country is a BANANA REPUBLIC....with NO Bananas.
BS.......
We should all be glad that we have driven ridiculous attorneys like this Berg character out of the GOP. We don’t need feckless attorneys filing cases they can’t win to distract us from the election.
Not nutcase Pennsylvania lawyers, that's for sure.
At any rate, I wonder if one could sue the Electoral College for not enforcing constitutional requirements if it, of course, chose not to as was surmised by a previous poster.