Who Enforces the Constitution's Natural Born Citizen Clause? (dismissal in Berg v. Obama et al.)

American Thinker ^ | October 29, 2008 | Mark J. Fitzgibbons

[Eric Blair 2084]

You have to enforce it. Good luck.

Just remember.

“One man with courage makes a majority.”

I’m not going to tell the 264 pound dude that he can’t vote 7 times. Neither will the DOJ apparently.

[Kevmo]

I’m glad to see this is getting play in the media but it’s probably a bit too late. It was a brilliant move by Obama to have judge Surrick wait as long as he did. I’m afraid the fix is in.

[TChris]

I’m afraid the fix is in.

I believe you are correct. The pieces for this endgame have been placed over decades. For decades Republican politicians have been unwilling and/or unable to see it.

[John Valentine]

Q: Who enforces the Constitutional requirments for the Presidency?

A: The Electoral College.

Note: If they have the guts.

[John Valentine]

I agree with Fitzgibbons’ analysis. The Federal Courts have the power to hear and decide the case if they want to.

All it will take as one courageous judge.

[AndyTheBear]

Lets not be too harsh.

I'm sure the judge did his very best, and considered carefully and with all due diligence what the most plausible sounding line of total bull would best obscure his open defiance of the rule of law.

[GoodDay]

Speaking of Berg, didn’t he claim last week on Michael Savage’s program that he was going to release a tape recording of zero’s paternal grandmother admitting that zero was born in Kenya and that she had witnessed it?

Is Berg leading us on, or does he really have such a recording?

[Jack Hammer]

“Who Enforces the Constitution’s Natural Born Citizen Clause?”

Evidently, no one.

But then, it’s just as evident that no one bothers to read the constitution anymore, and few in America seem to care very much. The world’s first and greatest experiment in republican government is being allowed to slide down the crapper by those whose freedom was purchased with the blood of countless patriots. The entire thing is utterly disgusting.

[neverdem]

All it will take as one courageous judge.

Will Berg try to go to SCOTUS? I don't think he has time for the Circuit Court.

[John Valentine]

That’s my understanding...

[KTM rider]

is this “lawyer in a robe” saying not Berg , but only McCain could file suit ?

[neverdem]

is this “lawyer in a robe” saying not Berg , but only McCain could file suit ?

I can't say. I didn't read the decision, just the article that the judge dismissed it.

[John Valentine]

I heard that interview, and I have also read that Berg does indeed claim to have such a tape, AND sworn affidavits, all of which he was going to release in the “next couple of days” or “next day or two”.

That was almost a week ago.

I now wonder if this tape, and the affidavits are going into the black hole along with
- the Michelle Obama “whitey” tape,
- the Michelle Obama African Press International “my husband was adopted by a foreigner” tapes,
- the “three certified copies” of the Barack Obama birth certificate from the Coast general Hospital, Mombasa, Kenya.

All of these have been reliably asserted to exist, and to be revealed within days, and none, NONE come to light.

One must consider the possibility that these stories are complete crap.

[Waco]

When 0 decides to ‘’redistribute’’ ‘’steal’’ 80% of the judges wealth, will he have any ‘’standing’’ to bit-h or just shut up?

[Red_Devil 232]

Here is an exclent article concerning the legality of a U.S. Citizen requesting that Obama produce his BC.

Family Security Matters

[TheStealthBaumFighter]

Berg has been sounding like a nut case for a long time. No one is taking him seriously anymore.

[TheStealthBaumFighter]

You are right, the stories are all crap. If there was anything to it, Berg would have provided evidence by now. It’s a lost cause and time to move onto something else.

[Red_Devil 232]

1. The U.S. Constitution is a CONTRACT between The People, The States, and The United States, the federal government, that defines and limits the role of the federal government, and the rights of the States and The People, and, among other things, defines and limits the qualifications for president, i.e., that the president must be over the age of 35 years, and must be a natural born citizen.

2. Any party to a CONTRACT has standing to enforce it. This is as basic as it gets. Contract Law 101. First week of law school stuff. And it seems that lawyers and judges all over the country have forgotten all about it. Also, the Constitution was intended to benefit all American citizens, We, The People, and in basic contract law the intended beneficiaries of a CONTRACT, i.e., us, also have standing to enforce it.

3. If We, The People, do not have standing to enforce the CONTRACT, the U.S. Constitution, then it is unenforceable, and if it is unenforceable it is just a historic curiosity that means nothing. It’s just an old piece of parchment. But that was not the intent, and to give intent to the CONTRACT it must be enforceable by its parties and beneficiaries.

4. We, The People, have standing under the First Amendment "to petition the government for redress of grievances." If we have a grievance that a non-citizen, illegal alien, is running for president, I think the First Amendment unequivocally gives every American citizen standing to sue the government to redress that grievance and enforce the Constitution.

The above is from this article Family Security Matters

[neverdem]

I may not have made myself clear. I think the NRA's effect against Obama may dwarf any "Bradley effect." That's what I'm praying for. It's not Obama's color. It's Obama's political philosophy.

NRA goes up with its own "closing argument"

Red Star over Obama's America

The NRA vs. Obama

Dems Want to Data Mine e-4473 Information

NRA may have to bag Election Day ads opposing Obama

Audio Proof Bill Ayers calling Barack Obama

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.