Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck; TheFourthMagi

Thank you both for an interesting discussion. Regret your parting was so graphic.

Based on O’s use of the word “reflects”, it is easy enough for many of us to conclude he will take steps to “correct” the fundamental flaw(s) he sees in the Constitution.


16 posted on 10/28/2008 12:10:37 PM PDT by frog in a pot (Is there a definition of "domestic enemies" as used in federal oaths, or is that just lip service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: frog in a pot

Glad you got something out of it. No biggie about the parting. All in good fun. I’ve seen much worse. As to your point, I don’t think he’ll bother to try actually amending the Constitution. He’ll just do what he wants to do regardless. That’s why I think it’s important to know that he does undertstand. He is for willful subversion, or as he calls it—”the change we need.”


17 posted on 10/28/2008 12:47:54 PM PDT by Huck (Teddy Roosevelt vs. Che Guevera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: frog in a pot

Thank you for the cordiality of your comment. It is appreciated.


18 posted on 10/28/2008 12:59:13 PM PDT by TheFourthMagi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson