Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: frog in a pot

Glad you got something out of it. No biggie about the parting. All in good fun. I’ve seen much worse. As to your point, I don’t think he’ll bother to try actually amending the Constitution. He’ll just do what he wants to do regardless. That’s why I think it’s important to know that he does undertstand. He is for willful subversion, or as he calls it—”the change we need.”


17 posted on 10/28/2008 12:47:54 PM PDT by Huck (Teddy Roosevelt vs. Che Guevera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Huck

“...I don’t think he’ll bother to try actually amending the Constitution.”

Agreed.

He will rely on federal agency policy revisions, Executive Orders, judicial appointments, state and federal legislation and state Governors, to name a few.

It also appears he is a single vote away from having the SC.
(Bush v Gore 5-4, Heller 5-4 to say nothing of the property rights cases.)

And, there is his proposed Civil National Security Force.


19 posted on 10/28/2008 3:21:47 PM PDT by frog in a pot (Is there a definition of "domestic enemies" as used in federal oaths, or is that just lip service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson