Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court
ObamaCrimes.com Phillip Berg ^ | 10/25/2008 | Phillip j. Berg

Posted on 10/25/2008 3:52:37 PM PDT by Danae

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 481-486 next last
To: Styria
The Constitution does have a mechanism to deal with this. It’s the House of Representatives that deals with the eligibility of a President-Elect.

And this particular House of representatives would happily qualify Josef Stalin as eligible.

241 posted on 10/25/2008 7:24:17 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Bump!

This is a three ring circus gone bad.


242 posted on 10/25/2008 7:25:20 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Danae

That needs to be made into its own thread!


243 posted on 10/25/2008 7:26:36 PM PDT by RatsDawg (I love Palin :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; ncfool

244 posted on 10/25/2008 7:27:19 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Danae

obumpa


245 posted on 10/25/2008 7:29:36 PM PDT by Dajjal (Visit Ann Coulter's getdrunkandvote4mccain.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

I have not read the whole thread, sorry if this has been mentioned. So the facts as I understand are:

- BHO, Michelle, Bernadine and Surrick all have connections back to the same law firm in their younger days
- Surrick is now in Hawaii
- BHO made a sudden trip to Hawaii to visit a gravely ill grandmother that he has seen once in 25 years, after waiting three days to go while he was still campaigning
- BHO was scheduled to leave Hawaii at 5pm on Friday (I heard it on CNN)
- the judge issued his findings at 6:15pm

Something just seems a little fishy if you ask me . . .


246 posted on 10/25/2008 7:30:06 PM PDT by Free America52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
It also may be that the citizens have no ‘standing’ until or unless Obama is actually elected President. If he isn’t,the the point is mute. This is just a guess....

Bingo.

That's what the judge held.

The Michigan Law Review articles I posted on my thread set out the avenues for addressing this issue after the election.

If Obama wins.

247 posted on 10/25/2008 7:30:06 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Free America52

And didn’t Obama go to Hawaii by himself, and left the wife and kids?


248 posted on 10/25/2008 7:32:00 PM PDT by RatsDawg (I love Palin :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Danae

During an election for Senator (either the Illinois or US Senates, I forget which), Obama had votes for his opposition voided on the basis that the individual voters were “ineligible”. A court upheld that accusation.

So, Obama has “standing” to deem voters “ineligible” and have their votes voided, but citizens who are voters cannot challenge his eligibility for the Presidency?

Is this ever screwed up!


249 posted on 10/25/2008 7:32:06 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

It would not be a change of any law.

The Constitution is the law, and the idea that any citizen of legal voting age has no standing to demand that the business of the US be done according to that document is absurd.


250 posted on 10/25/2008 7:35:10 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obama isn't just an empty suit, he's a Suit-Bomb trying to sneak into the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free America52

Fishier than Fulton’s Fish Market!

This is really something that SCREAMS for investigation by the MSM!

I am not holding my breath.


251 posted on 10/25/2008 7:36:46 PM PDT by Mr. Jazzy (USMC- Guarding freedom around the world since 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Good attorneys always provide the judge a suggested ruling in their favor. Judges don’t have to use them, but they often do.


252 posted on 10/25/2008 7:38:45 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle; Danae

You do not need a birth certificate to get a passport.

Obama had two opportunities to get a passport.

One - he could have kept his mother’s ‘family passport’ renewed. Then, his mother, Stanley Ann, ONLY needed a notorized letter to add her baby to the passport. Keeping it renewed would have turned into his own passport.

Two - our state department does NOT require a birth certificate. If you do not have one, you take the Letter of No Record option to apply for one.


253 posted on 10/25/2008 7:39:51 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

http://james4america.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/judge-surrick-received-the-decision-he-issued/

From the website: I am in the process of reviewing the memorandum, but one item that immediately caught my attention in a brief glance was this comment in the footnotes:

“...Moreover, the Court In Bullock did not limit or in any way invalidate votes that had already been cast; nor did it void the results of the elections that had taken place. Se Ed. at 136- 37, 149 (affi,ing thai court’s pe,,aianent injunction of the filing fee law). By contrast, Plaintiff would have us derail the democratic process by invalidating a candidate for whom millions of people voted and who underwent excessive vetting during what was one ot’the most iotIy contested presidential primaly in living memory...
Pg 11

(spelling mistakes in transcript aside, that is one of the most self-serving, disgusting, disgraceful...things I have read in my entire life!)

The Hawaii trip was obviously very productive for obama.


254 posted on 10/25/2008 7:42:40 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: ncfool; Fred Nerks; Danae
Yes, Obama worked at this firm and Andy Martin reported on it.

http://contrariancommentary.blogspot.com/2008/09/andy-martin-exposes-barack-obamas-lies.html

Excerpt:

Obama's law degree thus appears to have been financed through the encouragement of persons who had been violent revolutionaries and remain unrepentant to this day, the same unconventional way the purchase of Obama's Chicago mansion was party financed by an Iraqi billionaire.

Why did Obama get hired as a "summer associate" in 1989 at the law firm which had hired Ayers' wife, and where Ayers' father was a prominent friend of the managing partner at Sidley & Austin? The answer is obvious. Ayers was grooming Obama as his future "front."

Where did Obama get his first and only legal job after Harvard? At a law firm where Tony Rezko was a prominent client and where name partner Judson Miner was a law school classmate of Bernadine Dohrn-Ayers. Yes, the pieces are starting to come together.

Was Obama telling ABC the truth when he said met the Ayers' at a coffee klatch at the Ayers home in 1995? Ayers had already been working with Obama for seven years; Ayers had appointed Obama to head a $50 million foundation. Did Ayers appoint a stranger? Or a front man? The answer is obvious.

(snip)

255 posted on 10/25/2008 7:45:43 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

If you call or e-mail, please include my post 222, thanks!!!


256 posted on 10/25/2008 7:48:48 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Free America52

I have not followed the whole story as well. But, this is too easy to refute. All he has to do is produce a birth certificate.

How hard could it be if he was born here? (The US)


257 posted on 10/25/2008 7:49:34 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: David; Bigh4u2; All

Here’s a link to the thread with the Michigan Law Review articles.

Legal Issues in Connection With Challenge to Presidential Eligibility Under Article II, Sec. 1

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2113310/posts


258 posted on 10/25/2008 7:50:23 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Onerom99

He could, he has standing.


259 posted on 10/25/2008 7:50:47 PM PDT by Danae (Obama = Trickle up Poverty. Don't like it, get ready to be"reeducated" into it if he is elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
http://contrariancommentary.blogspot.com/2008/09/andy-martin-hammers-barack-obama-over.html

Excerpt:

1989 Tom Ayers and William Ayers get Obama a summer job at Sidley & Austin (where he meets Michelle Obama); Ayers' wife Bernadine Dohrn also worked at Sidley at about the same time as Barack and Michelle.

260 posted on 10/25/2008 7:51:59 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 481-486 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson