Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is it time to scrap the Electoral College?
pMSNBC/MSN ^ | 10/21/08 | Tom Curry

Posted on 10/21/2008 11:14:49 AM PDT by AT7Saluki

...The system is a relic of the early days of the republic when electors were supposed to be independent agents exercising their judgment in choosing a presidential candidate from a list of several contenders.

Today, electors are party loyalists who almost always vote for their party’s nominee.

On Friday, a group of legal scholars, political scientists, and systems specialists gathered at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for a conference on the Electoral College. Their focus? How to better engineer the system...

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: election; electoral; voting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
Methinks perhaps the DBM knows something more than they're reporting?
1 posted on 10/21/2008 11:14:50 AM PDT by AT7Saluki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

What is DBM?


2 posted on 10/21/2008 11:15:43 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

Is it time to scrap the Biased Press?

(leaving the EC alone....)

3 posted on 10/21/2008 11:16:28 AM PDT by xcamel (Conservatives start smart, and get rich, liberals start rich, and get stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

Uh oh, Democrats are NERVOUS!


4 posted on 10/21/2008 11:16:36 AM PDT by Obadiah (Vote for Obama so he can spread your wealth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

its time to scrap PMSNBC.


5 posted on 10/21/2008 11:16:43 AM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki
Wup. It's time for the first "is it time to scrap the electoral college" article.

First of many, I should say.

6 posted on 10/21/2008 11:16:51 AM PDT by Steely Tom (RKBA: last line of defense against vote fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

Obviously this means they believe “The 0” is going to lose the electoral college but might win the popular vote.


7 posted on 10/21/2008 11:16:56 AM PDT by Mr Fuji (Just say NO to the 0!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

Drive By Media (see Maha Rushie lexicon).


8 posted on 10/21/2008 11:17:11 AM PDT by AT7Saluki (No cejar, no ceder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

If it will help the great leader, by all means!


9 posted on 10/21/2008 11:17:27 AM PDT by Jagman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

drive-by media...

a related question to the one asked in this article...Is it time to scrap the world series and decide who wins the championship based on cumulative runs scored through the entire baseball season instead?


10 posted on 10/21/2008 11:17:33 AM PDT by stefanbatory (Do you want a President or a King?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

The answer is no. Though it might be a salutory reform to force all states to go onto the Maine/Nebraska system.


11 posted on 10/21/2008 11:17:40 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (For real change stop electing lawyers: Fighter-Pilot/Hockey-Mom '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

The librats bring this up every Presidential election cycle.


12 posted on 10/21/2008 11:18:01 AM PDT by TADSLOS (Put Palin in the White House. Send McCain to Sun City, AZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

oooops looks like MSNBC knows nObama isn’t going to get the electoral votes


13 posted on 10/21/2008 11:18:07 AM PDT by txroadkill (Do it for Sarah!- Conservatism= finding joy in duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Gosh, I remember, back in the day when I went to MIT, how it was a serious school.

Indeed, a lone island of conservatism (with occasional absurd faculty member the exception) in a sea of liberal idiocy.

How things have changed


14 posted on 10/21/2008 11:18:10 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (A Jew voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Col. Sanders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

The DemocRATs would love to scrap the Electoral College, since they would never lose another Presidential Election.

Of course, they would love to scrap the entire U.S. Constitution.


15 posted on 10/21/2008 11:18:10 AM PDT by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

How to better engineer the system...

All I needed to read.


16 posted on 10/21/2008 11:18:25 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

Douche Bag Media?


17 posted on 10/21/2008 11:19:29 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo (I'm not against 0bama because he's black. I'm against 0bama because he's red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki
Not just no - HELL NO!
18 posted on 10/21/2008 11:19:33 AM PDT by shove_it (and have a nice day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki

I think it’s time to short-sell 1000 shares of (NBC-owner) General Electric.


19 posted on 10/21/2008 11:19:41 AM PDT by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AT7Saluki
...The system is a relic of the early days of the republic when electors were supposed to be independent agents exercising their judgment in choosing a presidential candidate from a list of several contenders.

INCORRECT! It's a relic of a time when states were actually their own little republics, or commonwealths. A time when the Union was a Union of free, independent states. A time when the Fed gubmint was thought to only be responsible for those collective tasks enumerated in the Constitution that required a united purpose. In short, it's from a time when the Constitution meant something.

20 posted on 10/21/2008 11:20:38 AM PDT by Huck (Teddy Roosevelt vs. Che Guevera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson