Posted on 10/21/2008 8:58:46 AM PDT by The_Tick_01
It is true that most voters vote their pocketbooks. But that doesnt mean they would elect Mao Zedong president even if they believed he could guarantee robust job growth, low inflation, and a roaring stock market.
Therefore, another truth is that voters want to know (and are entitled to know, as pollster Frank Luntz put it so well and John McCain didnt) facts that help them draw conclusions about a candidates politics and character.
Why is it, then, that Democratic politicians and their liberal allies pooh-pooh the Bill Ayres issue as a distraction?
Why is they mock demands for full knowledge of a presidential candidates alliance with a far-left, unrepentant former terrorist leader to improve education for Chicagos children, not by enriching them with effective teaching in the three Rs but by corrupting them with the R of leftist radicalism?
Why is it they blithely dismiss the significance of a presidential candidates alliance with a former terrorist who as recently as 2001 said, I dont regret setting bombs. I feel we didnt do enough. (Remember that part of the didnt do enough was a failed attempt to bomb a dance at a New Jersey army base.)
(Excerpt) Read more at newmediajournal.us ...
**But that doesnt mean they would elect Mao Zedong president ...**
If it was Mao Zedong (D)... he’d get minimum 28% of the vote.
He’s still a puss that wants to be like the real tough guys. “My friend could beat you up.”
**Who Barak has chosen to associated with should give all Americans pause.**
My daughter (She’s 21) couldn’t understand all this AYERS stuff. So I used ME for Obama and TIMOTHY McVeigh for Ayers, and told here the basic timeline. SHE Understands now!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.