Skip to comments.
The Inaccuracy of Political Polling in 2008, proof pollsters are oversampling Democrats
MVRed.com ^
| October 20th, 2008
| MVRed.com
Posted on 10/20/2008 4:41:21 PM PDT by mvred.com
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
1
posted on
10/20/2008 4:41:21 PM PDT
by
mvred.com
To: mvred.com
Truthfully many have LEFT the GOP.
Demoncrats do out number Republicans. That is WHY the numbers are more skewed.
2
posted on
10/20/2008 4:42:52 PM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: mvred.com
They are oversampling Democrats because there are in fact more registered Ds than registered Rs. It only stands to reason that their samples will reflect the partisan ID amongst the general public. Why does everyone have such a hard time with that? The Ds spent all their primary registering new voters - millions of them.
To: St. Louis Conservative
Yet not everyone who registers to vote (see: ACORN, Operation Chaos, New Voters) will vote.
This is why the Likely Voter “Special Sauce” is important. Frankly, this election I have no idea what the turnout will be.
Palin has excited the Conservative Base. Obama has excited the African Americans, Many are disaffected with the GOP being in power, etc...
Who the heck knows!
4
posted on
10/20/2008 4:45:37 PM PDT
by
rom
(Keep Senator Government from Spreading YOUR Wealth! McCain/Palin '08!)
To: nmh
Other reasons dim numbers are up: ACORN and Operation Chaos.
5
posted on
10/20/2008 4:45:47 PM PDT
by
pfflier
To: mvred.com
Didn’t a lot of Republicans re-register as Dems for Operation Chaos? Not sure on what scale that was. Anyone know if that could be a factor?
6
posted on
10/20/2008 4:45:58 PM PDT
by
nascent skeptic
("Obamatron, you will awaken from deep trance on Nov.6th to a McCain Palin landslide...")
To: nmh
There is good reason to ascertain that many have stopped being Republican AND that this is significantly oversampled.
7
posted on
10/20/2008 4:46:11 PM PDT
by
unspun
(Pray and Work! http://www.presidentialprayerteam.org)
To: St. Louis Conservative
The Ds spent all their primary registering new voters - millions of them.And a miniscule number of them are even real!
8
posted on
10/20/2008 4:47:10 PM PDT
by
Ingtar
(Go Palin! And the white-haired guy too, I suppose. '08)
To: nmh
Truthfully many have LEFT the GOP.
So where do you get your "TRUTH" from?
Do you really think that a real conservative would switch ranks and vote for a Marxist? And if so, where does your rationale come from?
9
posted on
10/20/2008 4:48:06 PM PDT
by
Hot Tabasco
(Spreading manure around helps growth. Spreading wealth around creates manure)
To: mvred.com
Well, you know what I always say: The last 2.77 percent is always the hardest.
10
posted on
10/20/2008 4:48:08 PM PDT
by
Tanniker Smith
(Teachers open the door. It's up to you to enter. Before the late bell. When I close the door.)
To: pfflier
Operation Chaos
What percentage of Rush's 13-20 million listeners do you think did this? I only know 3.
To: mvred.com
Its hard to predict turnout this year. A good sign about turnout is individual contributions. Its true that Obama has enthused a lot of supporters and in some primaries black and youth turnout was in fact much higher. Still he gets pretty big crowds.
It remains to be seen whether that represents new voters or simply an enthused liberal base.
To: mvred.com

they always oversample RATS, but, the good news is... he's STILL WINNING or in a Statistical TIE even with the oversampling. 8^)
13
posted on
10/20/2008 4:50:27 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - McCain/Palin'08 = http://www.johnmccain.com/)
To: pfflier
Other reasons dim numbers are up: ACORN and Operation Chaos. Other reason Pubbie Numbers are up : Pumapac.org and Operation Joe Leiberman.
Operation Chaos assured that PUMA votes would be ours, millions of them.
14
posted on
10/20/2008 4:52:19 PM PDT
by
Candor7
(Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, ( member NRA)
To: St. Louis Conservative
They are oversampling Democrats because there are in fact more registered Ds than registered Rs. It only stands to reason that their samples will reflect the partisan ID amongst the general public. Why does everyone have such a hard time with that? The Ds spent all their primary registering new voters - millions of them. Methinks we're going to see a situation where the polls are radically off from the actual election day vote totals because what is being called "oversampling of Democrats" on here actually is oversampling of Democrats. Between fraudulent ACORN registrations, which won't translate into votes, and Operation Chaos reregistrants, which will not translate into votes for Obama, the polls are being skewed beyond any recognition point.
To: St. Louis Conservative
They are oversampling Democrats because there are in fact more registered Ds than registered Rs. Along with Winnie the Poo, Mickey Mouse, The Dallas Cowboys, the dude who registered 72 times.
To: itsPatAmerican
What percentage of Rush's 13-20 million listeners do you think did this? I only know 3. Never mistake personal experience for demographic trend.
To: itsPatAmerican
Couldn’t say but some people did change their affiliations to affect the primaries.
18
posted on
10/20/2008 4:57:39 PM PDT
by
pfflier
To: Candor7
19
posted on
10/20/2008 4:58:42 PM PDT
by
pfflier
To: St. Louis Conservative
We heard this same crap in 2004. Registrations do not equal votes. Never have, never will.
In the last presidential race it was 37 Republican, 37 Democrat.
The ACORN registrations are being tossed out by the thousands. Mickey Mouse and the rest of the Disney characters will not be voting on November 4th.
20
posted on
10/20/2008 5:02:12 PM PDT
by
1035rep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson