Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/20/2008 9:22:56 AM PDT by andrew roman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: andrew roman

bump and read —tax cut issue


2 posted on 10/20/2008 9:28:19 AM PDT by Taffini (Mr. Pippin and Mr. Waffles do not approve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

I wish the question would change, instead of arguing who gets the cut, fight Obama’s honesty in wanting the cut in the first place. IMHO, it is a BS focus group number. If Obama really wanted a tax cut for 95% of Americans, he can write a bill tomorrow or he could have written a bill in his two years as Senator. He never did. Instead, he voted for tax increases for everyone making over $46K/year.

Actions over rhetoric.

Put up or shut up Obama- if you believe it, write a bill.

If you don’t, then you show yourself to be nothing but a used car salesman.


3 posted on 10/20/2008 9:29:53 AM PDT by mnehring (We Are Joe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

100,000 people at a recent Obama rally? Is that for real?


4 posted on 10/20/2008 9:30:00 AM PDT by avacado (Barack Obama, the Cloward-Piven candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman
McCain is claiming that tax cuts are welfare now? Really?

300 million people in this country and we couldn't find a conservative to run for President?

5 posted on 10/20/2008 9:32:15 AM PDT by Mr. Know It All (Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman
Assuming that Obama will extend the already existing Bush tax cuts for those making less than $250,000

...and that is a gigantically naive assumption

6 posted on 10/20/2008 9:32:40 AM PDT by scottinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

It has been widely misstated that the wealth would be spread around. It is INCOME that will be spread around; the truly wealthy will have their assets well protected.


7 posted on 10/20/2008 9:34:54 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

but if 0bama wants to cut payroll taxes for a certain group, how will said certain group get their payroll tax “benefits” ... ie social security?

seems someone else will be paying those premiums.

that’s welfare.


8 posted on 10/20/2008 9:35:58 AM PDT by Principled (They used the CRA to undermine capitalism. They're using ACORN to undermine democracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman
There is something quite chilling when one realizes that Barack ACORN Obama disregards the Constitution where just born alive infants are in a life and death situation, and this ‘man’ will be deciding whom is worthy of living via the dependence upon government dole. And he will have a way to make 95% of Americans dependent upon the government.
10 posted on 10/20/2008 9:37:39 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

I don’t know that I’d agree with ‘welfare’ but I sure see the “redistributing wealth” in his idea.

OB’s idea of tax credit it truly a shining example of what Joe was trying to get across when he asked OB the question. It is getting lost in all the ‘smoke-n-mirrors’ the liberal are throwing out.


14 posted on 10/20/2008 9:42:24 AM PDT by beachn4fun (This space left intentionally blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

Awesome debunking of an Obama cover-up! These things need to be told to those “nasty little fact haters” so they can vote right.


19 posted on 10/20/2008 9:52:01 AM PDT by FutureRocketMan (Israel past, Israel now, Israel future; God Bless our soldiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman
NOT a word about O'bama letting the Bush tax cuts elapse..
Thereby increasing taxes to virtually everyone..
22 posted on 10/20/2008 9:57:16 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman
I'm not giving tax cuts to folks who don't work, I'm giving tax cuts to people who do work.

Of course, these so-called tax cuts eventually will be phased out after one reaches a certain income level. They'll not only pay tax on each marginal dollar earned, they will have their "tax cut" reduced, thereby creating a disincentive to work harder.

23 posted on 10/20/2008 9:57:36 AM PDT by NJRighty (Under President B. Hussein Obama, will the stars and stripes be replaced by a hammer and sickle?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman
The tens of millions of families working hard and paying payroll taxes do not think that tax cuts are a form of “welfare” or “redistribution” – they think it is only fair to reward work.”

What the Lord High 0bama means is he is going to reward a little work and punish a lot of work.

That is why communist societies can't produce anything of value, and eventually collapse under their own weight. No one is willing to work hard enough to make anything of lasting value. The communists must then resort to stealing what they need from a capitalist.

26 posted on 10/20/2008 10:03:36 AM PDT by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

Giving so called tax cuts to people who don’t pay income tax.

What do you call it, O-bully. Educate us!!!


28 posted on 10/20/2008 10:04:53 AM PDT by Carley (she's all out of caribou.............but does have a bracelet!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

Wait until these people who voted for him find themselves with nothing. Dictators or such don’t give money out; they only take.


30 posted on 10/20/2008 10:28:22 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman
Nifty plan, eh?

Yes it is. I could just invent enough income to show a couple bucks worth of fed taxes and rake in $900+ bucks. The IRS will never question the reporting of imaginary income.

32 posted on 10/20/2008 10:30:27 AM PDT by TigersEye (''Stroke of the pen, law of the land. Pretty neat.'' -- Paul 'the forehead' Begala)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

bump


52 posted on 10/20/2008 12:02:52 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman
George Bush I used the line voodoo economics to describe Reagan's economic agenda. We know what happened. The real voodoo economics will be what Obama has planned. As a Marxist he is seriously out of his depth in the econ field and will have to rely on more sensible heads to tell him what to do. People like Warren Buffet.

Obama to Buffet "you mean I can't just confiscate everybody's income and distribute it as I see fit?" Buffet "uh, no, that would be a very bad idea." Obama: "gosh darn it, why can't I just appropriate it all?" Buffet: "because it's unconstitutional." Obama: "who cares about the constitution?"

54 posted on 10/20/2008 1:14:22 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: andrew roman

63 posted on 10/20/2008 5:52:15 PM PDT by Colonial Warrior (Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from the rear, or a fool from any direction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson