To: Norman Bates; zendari; impeachedrapist; RoseofTexas; JulieRNR21; PhiKapMom; nutmeg; ...
This is also what’s at stake. The author of this article makes our point for us without intending to.
2 posted on
10/18/2008 5:28:06 PM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(If Islam conquers the world, the Earth will be at peace because the human race will be killed off.)
To: Clintonfatigued
The Liberals would love a packed liberal-majority court. The judges could legislate most all laws from the bench, disregard the U.S. Constitution and rule according to International Law of the World Court. All the Congress would need to do would be to pass tax-raising laws and leave the rest to the Supremes.
4 posted on
10/18/2008 5:41:32 PM PDT by
KriegerGeist
(I'm now considered a "Bitter Clinger" to my guns and religion.)
To: Clintonfatigued
5 posted on
10/18/2008 5:47:51 PM PDT by
padre35
(Sarah Palin is the one we've been waiting for..Rom 10.10..)
To: Clintonfatigued
6 posted on
10/18/2008 5:47:55 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(McCain/Palin 2008 : Palin the Paladin 2012)
To: Clintonfatigued
Here are some of the most important rulings that would be threatened by a McCain Court: Going back to conservative values is a threat? A threat to what?
Only to a liberal mind.
8 posted on
10/18/2008 6:01:40 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Clintonfatigued
Major reason why this election is so important, so common sense and true American values can prevail, NOT liberal/leftist ideology.
To: Clintonfatigued
Well, dang. Of course the SC is at stake. That’s why we have to win.
11 posted on
10/18/2008 8:25:12 PM PDT by
chesley
(I'm still alive, still employed, & still married. Life is GOOD)
To: Clintonfatigued
Why do they love terrorist prisoners so?
13 posted on
10/19/2008 7:09:45 AM PDT by
Impy
(Spellcheck hates Obama, you should too.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson