Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Prole

Lets be clear what Obama wanted to do. What Obama wants to do is spread Joe Plumber’s money around. With the power of deadly force he will take Joe’s property - his wealth. Then spread it around based on Obama’s arbitrary criteria on who should get money that Joe earned through his smarts and sweat.

That kind of transfer used to be called theft. When liberals do it, then its called justice. When marxist do it, then its called marxist economics.


6 posted on 10/15/2008 10:08:31 PM PDT by steve0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: steve0

LOL! Savage just called it “trickle-up poverty”.


8 posted on 10/15/2008 10:11:46 PM PDT by ducdriver (Quantum potes tantum aude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: steveo
That kind of transfer used to be called theft. When liberals do it, then its called justice. When marxist do it, then its called marxist economics.

Great way to put this crap in perspective.

26 posted on 10/16/2008 2:46:28 AM PDT by Republic (Barak is anti-Jewish, has to be, or he would have left Wright's church years ago!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: steve0
Lets be clear what Obama wanted to do. What Obama wants to do is spread Joe Plumber’s money around. With the power of deadly force he will take Joe’s property - his wealth. Then spread it around based on Obama’s arbitrary criteria on who should get money that Joe earned through his smarts and sweat. That kind of transfer used to be called theft. When liberals do it, then its called justice. When marxist do it, then its called marxist economics.

It is marxist, and I wish that McCain has said so on national TV:

"What Senator Obama proposes is nothing more than a Marxist redistribution of wealth reminiscent of the old Soviet Union, Eastern Europe during the cold war, Cuba under Castro, North Korea, and communist countries around the world. In the words of Karl Marx, the father of communism, 'From each according to their means, to each according to their needs.' My opponent calls this the "trickle up theory." I call it the largest redistribution of wealth from small business owners -- from every 'Joe the Plumber' who has worked long hours, saved money rather than spent like a drunken congressman on things he can't afford, taken risks at personal sacrifice, and built a business that employs people in the community and pumps money back into the local economy -- to people who, under my opponent's plan, don't work, and don't even pay taxes. How do you give tax breaks to people who don't pay taxes? In a socialist/Marxist society, you confiscate the wealth earned by the people who build businesses and create jobs and you let some bureaucrat give your money to able bodies adults who don't work and really don't want to work out of some sense of entitlement. Senator Obama's Marxist economic proposals failed in the Old Soviet Union as evidenced by the fall of the Berlin Wall, and they have failed in Cuba, North Korea, and communist countres around the world. Obama's plan is wrong for America and it is wrong for the world."

38 posted on 10/16/2008 5:00:11 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson