Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DEAD BY ELECTION DAY (from SLATE, not incendiary; what if president-elect cannot serve?)
slate ^ | September 29, 2008 | Nina Shen Rastogi

Posted on 10/12/2008 10:23:46 PM PDT by doug from upland

NOTE: IT IS WORTH READING THE ENTIRE ARTICLE. It is very interesting. What if the court determines, after the election, that Obama is Kenyan and ineligible for the presidency?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Dead by Election Day What happens if a presidential candidate passes away at the last second? By Nina Shen Rastogi Posted Monday, Sept. 29, 2008, at 6:54 PM ET

excerpt:

The outcome would be a little more straightforward—though not necessarily more politically satisfying—if the candidate dies between the general election on Nov. 4 but before the Electoral College votes on Dec. 15. There's no federal law that mandates how electors must cast their votes; theoretically, if the candidate to whom they were pledged dies and their party has not made a preferred successor clear, electors can vote for their party's VP candidate, a third-party candidate, or a leading preconvention contender within their own party. Under this scenario, however, individual state laws have the potential to make things murky, given that each state has the power to determine exactly how its electoral votes are to be cast and distributed.

Bonus Explainer: What if the candidate dies after the election but before the inauguration on Jan. 20? The 20th Amendment states that if the president-elect dies before beginning his term, then the vice president-elect assumes his or her spot. However, the point at which a candidate officially becomes "president-elect" is debatable. He or she definitely assumes the title after Jan. 6, when a joint session of Congress officially counts the Electoral College votes and declares a winner. But the shift could be said to occur immediately after the Electoral College vote.

(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: 2008; birthcertificate; electoralcollege; issues; kenya; mccain; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: doug from upland
Yeah but the article only answers the problem of death. My point would be that the ticket itelf was invalid an the rules as you describe would be void. Can electors pledged to a candidate who does not qualify under the Constitution be accepted as valid electors?

Jeff Greenfield wrote a novel ten or twelve years ago that humorously dealt with the problem as described in your post, but no one has posited a situation where a candidate wins under false pretenses. In the professions the problem is clearly resolved: a teacher who is found to not have certification is dismissed and can be sued for recovery of compensation. The law is even more clear as not only is the person prosecuted, but his cases are rendered moot and must be revisited.

21 posted on 10/13/2008 8:33:23 AM PDT by xkaydet65 (Freedom is purchased not with gold, but with steel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: machogirl
They never quit.

Never

I, for one, will not count Hillary!™ out until the very last of a legion of demons has reluctantly left her rotting corpse.

22 posted on 10/13/2008 8:48:39 AM PDT by null and void (I'm writing about all the things I ought to do before I die. It's my oughtobiography...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: machogirl
They never quit.

Never

I, for one, will not count Hillary!™ out until the very last of a legion of demons has reluctantly left her rotting corpse.

23 posted on 10/13/2008 8:49:26 AM PDT by null and void (I'm writing about all the things I ought to do before I die. It's my oughtobiography...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Sheesh, is SLATE indulging in wishful thinking?
24 posted on 10/13/2008 8:52:19 AM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudtobeanamerican1

YOU are kidding right. I think Obama is the creepiest part.

only if he wins


25 posted on 10/13/2008 8:58:24 AM PDT by ari-freedom ("He (Obama) cannot win, Bill. He cannot win" -Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Thanks DOug....This answers a lot of questions

including why Hillary wanted the VP position so much.


26 posted on 10/13/2008 9:02:51 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Acorn, Africa, Ayers, and we haven't even gotten to the "B's" yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I think this is the summary. Any comments?

Before election:

•DNC decides, method not specified
•RNC fills vacancy, reconvene convention or RNC state representitves vote, simple majority wins

Just before the election:

•Congress may pass special legislation to move back election day to give more time for the party to select a new candidate and regroup

11/4 Election

After election, but before Electoral College

•No federal law. Electors open to vote for VP, third party, or convention runner up. State laws may affect elector's abilities to select.

12/15 Electoral College

After Electoral College, before Congress counts the votes

•Congress counts Electoral College votes and declares winner. Winner's VP gets it

-or-

•Congress throws out votes. If a surviving candidate can be said to have a majority of votes, they get it.
-or-

•Congress throws out votes. Per 12th Amendment, House of represetitives selects from top three candidates with the most votes. (surviving Democrat or Republican and two third party candidates?)
-or-

•Per 20th Amendment, VP gets it, but only applies after candidate becomes 'President-Elect". That could be after Electoral College.

1/6 Congressional Vote Count

After Congressional count but before inauguration;
•Per 20th Amendment, VP gets it, but only applies after candidate becomes 'President-Elect" That is certainly after Congressional count.

1/20 Inauguration
•VP gets it

27 posted on 10/13/2008 9:04:10 AM PDT by null and void (I'm writing about all the things I ought to do before I die. It's my oughtobiography...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
Nothing in the Constitution says an ineligible person cannot RUN for the Presidency as the nominee of his party.

The Constitution says an ineligible person cannot serve as President.

28 posted on 10/13/2008 9:38:22 AM PDT by allmendream (White Dog Democrat: A Democrat who will not vote for 0bama because he's black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

I would think that the state requirement for ballot placement is that the candidate and party by requesting placement are attesting to the candidate’s qualifications. If those qualifications are not met then the candidate misrepresented himself and, depending on state law, that candidacy could be judged null and void. Like I said an interesting exercise in federalism. Not that this is going to happen because I believe Godot will show up before any evidence that Obama is not a natural born citizen, but it makes for interesting speculation.


29 posted on 10/13/2008 12:27:21 PM PDT by xkaydet65 (Freedom is purchased not with gold, but with steel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

You mean to say if the Kenyan is exposed with a Kenyan birth certificate?


30 posted on 10/13/2008 4:03:00 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA - Vote against the dem party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

I don’t think so. No justification.


31 posted on 10/14/2008 11:13:12 AM PDT by Impy (Spellcheck hates Obama, you should too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
What if the President elect is found to have been ineligible fr the office of POTUS? Would that not invalidate the entire election?

Nope ... except for the Supreme Court case, which he would lose, the results would be just the same as described above.

Except for the riots....

32 posted on 10/14/2008 11:16:11 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void

may be the first time in history of any nation
that VP would be President, and sitting in jail at the same time, complicit with BO for massive voter fraud.

In this particular scenario I see the entire DNC
guilty of massive fraud. Any electoral voter who
would possibly consider anyone in the DNC would have
to be out of their freaking mind. Democrats always
salute the one finger at the Constitution. They knowingly
nominated a candidate and they think their VP will get in?
Think again, if GOP figures out the entire sham in time, then the runner up would get in hands down.

No one can say that the VP didn’t know, no one would ever believe that, not in a thousand years. Especially after all this publicity.


33 posted on 11/04/2008 3:24:31 PM PST by leftwing nutjob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: leftwing nutjob

I had a college roommate who was a former Green Beret.

His job was ‘destabilizing’ foreign governments.

He returned to the US to the first non-elected president in US history....

Welcome to FR!


34 posted on 11/04/2008 3:32:14 PM PST by null and void (This isn't an election, it's a manifestation of a Salvador Dali painting. [Persistence of Division])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson