[JohnHuang2]

Kevin McCullough Ping...

[seekthetruth]

Send this to EVERY Obama supporter you know. Ask them, if they care at all about what happened to the Hillary supporters during the primary!

Clinton Supporters Share Evidence For RICO Case Against Obama:
http://www.wewillnotbesilenced2008.com/video/index.htm

[wgflyer]

The information is out there, but the fox is watching the hen house. Libs are in charge everywhere and those few Republicans who care don't simultaneously have the influence nor the gonads to use the information. America is inches away from becoming another third world failed state. And the public’s choices for their leaders are two of the many who engineered the country's downfall.

Pity.

[PGalt]

Thanks JH2.

[Stepan12]

Can someone help me wih this question -- please?

The lib/commies say we're hitting the arab kid with guilt by association because of him being mentored by Bill Ayers and having a pastor for 20 years who as regards 9/11 says "the chickens have come home to roost."

I always thought that guilt by association was rejection of a proposition because there is a person holding the proposition who is odious.

For example, people say smoking is bad but Adolf Hitler says smoking is bad; ergo, I will no longer hold that proposition because of the odiousness of Hitler (see guilt by association ).

But, guilt by association is not that we cannot judge B. Hussein Obama because he has Bill Ayers as his mentor and ghostwriter, he stayed in Pastor Wright's church for 20 years, he was a member of a Socialist party back in the 90s; etc.

The lib/commies are distorting the meaning of a logical fallacy in order to push B Hussein Obama.

And they've been getting away with it too because I've seen no one challenging their description of "guilt by association."

Or are the lib/commies right and I am wrong on this issue?

[blackie]

Excellent JH2, thanks!!

Molon Labe!!

[gitmo]

See Barack Obama has lesser judgement than you, because while you would never associate with a racist - he let himself be mentored by one: Dr. Jeremiah Wright. While you love your country and grieved the loss of 9.11.2001, Barack Obama has had a close relationship with someone who told all of America on 9.11 that he wished he could have terrorized the nation more. In fact Obama let this terrorist raise money for him, he served with him on two different boards, and they even partnered together to help infect the educational system in Chicago. Obama believed he could keep it quiet, and has repeatedly lied about his ties to this terrorist: William Ayers. Obama entered into deals he knew were shady with the now convicted felon: Tony Rezko. And it is now being revealed that Barack Obama helped the organization ACORN shakedown the banks that eventually caused the markets to lose nearly 9 trillion dollars of savings, retirement, and investment just this week.

How does any of this differ from the democRat party? They have been giving preference to people based on skin color for half a century.

They have been working hard to cripple the US economy since the Johnson presidency. Carter was a pro.

The left has been supporting military enemies of Liberty for decades. They supported the North Vietnamese, the Cuban regime, the Nicaraguan assault on the Contra freedom fighters, The Weatherman, the PLO, and the list goes on.

And research has shown that almost all election fraud has been on the democRat side.

So why isn't Obama the logical choice for that party?

[dixiechick2000]

"...such as bringing ACORN's advanced quality-control system to Washington."

Dear Lord...save us from that!

"You don't try to steal an election if you think you've got it all sewed up."

Absolutely right!

Excellent, as usual!
Thank you for all of your efforts.

Kevin McCullough and JohnHuang2 bump!