|
$ ping
The most effective tools, in my opinion, are neither cheap nor easy. We need to build a new “machine” to funnel money and expertise downward to individual citizens and small business owners.
TRANSLATION: the USA is being asked to bail out the world.
McCain did acknowledge the homeowners caught up in the mortgage crisis, primarily those facing foreclosure, not the more responsible home owners hit by declining home values, and I do not believe he has yet grasped the enormity of the problem. That's OK though. Obama hasn't grasped it yet either, nor has the Bush Administration, Congress, or most Americans.
Speculation and greed drove the housing prices up. That same speculation also drove cities across the nation to build tracks of new homes well beyond the number of qualified buyers. As the inventory of houses grew, lending companies created new ways to “qualify” buyers in an effort to broaden the buyer base.
There is no question now that these creative mortgage financing techniques failed. There is ample blame to go around, including the lending institutions, the unqualified buyers, the federal government, both political parties that were filling their coffers from the many participants, but also developers and local governments across the nation that approved the new tracks of homes thinking they were going to reap tax windfalls from an increased population base.
If the federal government goes out now and buys every foreclosed home on the market it will not restore a healthy housing market. This is because there will still be a glut of available homes with no buyers to purchase them. All that will have happened is the inventory will have changed hands. The inventory glut could last 10 to 15 years, possibly longer.
So long as the inventory of available homes outstrips demand, that is qualified buyers, home prices will continue to decline. But, there is another long-term consequence no one is addressing. The excessive inventory will continue to crush the home construction industry for years to come.
I've reached the conclusion the only way to restore both a healthy housing market and the home building industry is to clear out the excess inventory. In the bluntest of terms, remove from the market a large percentage of homes the government takes possession of. I'm basing this premise on a Reagan Administration policy.
During the mid-eighties, President Reagan, in an effort to help the dairy industry restore financial health, had the federal government purchase and slaughter a sizable population of dairy cows. Fewer cows producing milk reduced the supply which in turn increased prices dairies could get for their products. A similar approach would restore home equities and the home building industry.
How the government removes the homes from the market can be debated, but it is necessary. The federal government could allow individual cities to coordinate some of the efforts by exchanging the vacant homes in exchange for comparable valued inner city properties in tracks needing revitalization, and then destroying the structure in the area needing to be revitalized.
That's just a suggestion, and I'm certain others might have other ways to reduce the excess inventory. The important fact remains that the excess inventory must be taken off the market if both home equities and the home building industries are to be restored to health.
I'm not a fan of government involvement, and I was upset when the Reagan Administration exercised such efforts for the dairy industry, but I can now see clearly how a similar effort in the housing market would go a long way to restoring the entire economy. This action PLUS learning from the mistakes that created the financial mess, and putting in place whatever legislation is necessary to prevent a repeat, will do more than all the money the government is lavishing on financial institutions.
|
Interesting that it is again a G-6 meeting. Although not mentioned in the article, Russia is a missing player even though their stock market tanked before ours. When you consider that the World Bank was hacked into during June and July; as well as the incredible oil speculation that took place at the same time, it makes you wonder if there is more going on than “capitalism” having a bad couple months.
You can’t eliminate risk from the financial markets but government protection should only be applied to those “banks” that assume a certain low level of risk.
These are such simple concepts but apparently greed trumped common sense once again.
