Posted on 10/10/2008 11:36:56 AM PDT by pissant
The negative approach taken by the McCain-Palin campaign has coincided with a series of aggressive expressions towards the Democratic nominee over his Left-wing associations and background.
Apart from highlighting John McCain's connections to the Keating Five scandal, the Obama campaign has perceived benefits in staying above the fray but is always prepared with a defence when attacked.
With Mr Obama leading in the polls and only 24 days to go before the US presidential election, the series of outbursts have sparked the interest of the Secret Service, which guards the candidates and other dignitaries.
They launched a brief investigation after a man was heard but not recorded by several journalists shouting "kill him", when Mrs Palin, the Republican vice-presidential nominee, was speaking of Mr Obama's links to Bill Ayers, a former domestic terrorist who is now a professor in Chicago. The two men sat together on educational committees but have rarely been in contact for six years.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
Well, where’s the proof he isn’t a terrorist? I don’t see much.
President George W. Bush, in an address to a joint session of Congress on September 20, 2001 said, "Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists."
I think they called him “Communist”, it just sounded like “terrorist”...
“The two men sat together on educational committees but have rarely been in contact for six years.”
More BS by the media whores!
So I guess now McCain won’t be able to get tough with Obama.
BRING IT ON AND DON”T BACK DOWN!
During a Democratic primary debate in April, Obama called Ayers “a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who’s a professor of English in Chicago, who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis.”
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27114059/
That last sentence in Obama’s quote has always bothered me.
Not on a regular basis huh? Exchanging ideas on an occassional basis with an admitted terrorist should have been enough to sink his boat.
How convenient, all those cameras and microphones but nobody picked up the “kill him” or the “sit down boy” comments. Just another example of the media in the tank for hussein.
These guys are DNC plants. It’s why Carville speaks of “violence” if Obama loses; aimed at fomenting rage in the minority communities.
Ooooooohhhh. That’s racist.
The BBC is a socialist network.
I’m a little confused here. Since when do we say that telling the truth is “nasty”?
Why don't you ask the guy that souted it out?
Ever hear of being know by the company you keep? Besides, you probably wouldn't believe it if someone did give you iron-boud proof of it.
Come again Gunner?
You are who your friends are.
Well, wheres the proof he isnt a terrorist? I dont see much.
Why don’t you ask the guy that souted it out?
Ever hear of being know by the company you keep? Besides, you probably wouldn’t believe it if someone did give you iron-boud proof of it.
****I think he IS a terrorist. I don’t see much to the contrary. He’s just using politics instead of an IED or vest.
Someone should then ask how often he or Michelle exchange ideas with Bernadine Dorn...
Isn’t it sad? You can’t speak the truth if someone doesn’t want to hear it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.