To: Unam Sanctam
Be careful. The populist caucus on FR hate “the rich” even more than the Dems.
2 posted on
10/06/2008 10:05:51 PM PDT by
Clemenza
(PRIVATIZE FANNIE AND FREDDIE! NO MORE BAILOUTS!)
To: Unam Sanctam
Has the current ‘progressive’ tax system ever been challenged in court as being a violation of ‘equal protection under the law’?
3 posted on
10/06/2008 10:22:34 PM PDT by
Hessian
(Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.)
To: Unam Sanctam
"Tax the Rich" is a misnomer. There is no tax on wealth in this country. A person with a net worth of $100 million who earns $100,000 in a given year pays the exact same amount of taxes as someone with a net worth of $
-200,000 who earns $100,000 in that same year.
If liberals wish to tax the rich, then why don't they? They should practice what they preach and slap a wealth tax on the likes of John Kerry, Barbara Boxer, Hillary Clinton, Maria Cantwell, John Corzine, etc. Make them pay 10% of their net worth to the government every year.
7 posted on
10/07/2008 6:29:07 AM PDT by
Hoodat
(Obama's only connection to the descendants of American Slaves is that his muslim ancestors sold them)
To: Unam Sanctam
8 posted on
10/07/2008 6:32:45 AM PDT by
petercooper
(IQ tests for all voters!)
To: Unam Sanctam
I read this this morning.
It starts out with a fallacy that the goals of the tax code should be
“fairness and efficiency”.
Only a commie lefty would have “fairness” foremost in his mind concerning the tax code.
Taxes are to “fund the government”. “Fairness” is NOT an issue, unless, like I said, you have a communist mindset.
10 posted on
10/07/2008 6:35:14 AM PDT by
MrB
(0bama supporters: What's the attraction? The Marxism or the Infanticide?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
