Posted on 10/03/2008 12:02:36 PM PDT by WilliamReading
Well, Jim Lehrer had asked the question the week before, so it would have been standard practice to have answers to everything that had been asked of McCain and ZerObama.
Why has America allowed so-called "journalist" to now have control of the agenda of political debate in this country?
If that was unacceptable for a Congressional race in 1858, why is it acceptable for the Presidency in 2008?
This is the only "Moderator" that candidates should need.
I only bristled once at Ifill - when Palin gave a shout-out to the school kids and told them they got extra credit for watching, Ifill couldn’t keep her mouth shut and let Sarah have that moment, she had to chime in - “Everyone gets extra credit.” It wasn’t about you, Gwen.
There was nothing wrong with his post.
I don't disagree, but maybe you hold the media in much higher regard than I do. With the exception of Fox, I don't listen to any of their drivel.
Just think back to when you were in school, those guys that just didn't quite "get it" - those are the ones that became journalists.
I do too! She was fair and I didn’t see any partisanship!
She basically had a freebie coming from Ifill, and knew Ifill couldn't dare challenge her or risk being exposed as in the tank for O.
Great move on Palin's part to see the crack in the wall and walk right through.
if she was just a liberal...ok that’s part of the deal. We are the underdog. But this conflict of interest is just totally unacceptable.
obama was asked a similar question in the first presidential debate (as was mccain) I’m not surprised they anticipated it again.
obama was asked a similar question in the first presidential debate (as was mccain) I’m not surprised they anticipated it again.
Ifill mostly stayed out of it. I’m sure she was spooked by discussion of her affiliation beforehand. It would be nice to get someone who would really hound the candidates though - just once i’d like to see a debate moderator mercilessly blow through the BS answers.
Dishonorable Ifill
Gwen Ifill’s questions were not glaringly biased, but it was ridiculous that she didn’t feel the need to acknowledge her book on “The Age of Obama” at the beginning of the debate. It was the third time in this process that she has behaved dishonorably. The first was not disclosing the book to the Commission on Presidential Debates. The second was dismissing the criticism out of hand, and not acknowledging that debate moderators ought to not have a financial incentive to see one side win. And thirdly by refusing to acknowledge these facts during the debate, information that the viewers at home are entitled to take into consideration.
All of this is entirely separate from how pro-Obama the book is, and the questions she asked.
We had questions on the bailout bill, the subprime lending meltdown, taxes, promises the candidates will not be able to keep because of the cost of the bailout, the bankruptcy bill, climate change, capping carbon emissions, same sex benefits and gay marriage, an exit strategy for Iraq, whether a nuclear Iran or an unstable Pakistan is a greater threat (although according to the transcript, Ifill said ‘an unstable Afghanistan’ at one point), Secretaries of States’ comments on engaging our enemies, what has the administration done right or wrong on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, what should be the trigger for using nuclear weapons, putting troops on the ground in Darfur (maybe her best question), how the potential vice presidents would differ from their running mates, past comments expressing disinterest in being vice president, and when have you been forced to change a long-held view in order to accommodate changed circumstances.
It’s interesting that energy, Palin’s signature issue, never came up in the form of a question; she mentioned it in relation to questions about climate change and carbon emissions. As Ace noted, it’s interesting that abortion never came up, nor guns. Nothing on earmarks, government waste, or much on the budget.
10/03 09:37 AM
My thoughts exactly. Instead of whining about a mercenary in the MSM army, we should be partying over the conservative victory in the debate.
Tuesday, Oct. 7: Presidential debate with questions on any topic from the audience and the Internet, moderated by Tom Brokaw of NBC at Belmont University in Nashville, Tennessee, in a town hall-style format.
Wednesday, Oct. 15: Presidential debate on domestic and economic policy moderated by Bob Schieffer of CBS at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York, with candidates seated at a table.
What I disliked was that it seemed she let Biden have the last word too many times, not giving Sarah a chance to rebut.
Sarah always had to do it in the answer to the next question.
right! he spoke first, so i assumed Palin would speak last... but she didn't...
right! he spoke first, so i assumed Palin would speak last... but she didn't...
Anything she does I would grade an ‘F’.
JoMa
“This was the most distasteful question of the night: how would you abandon your running mate’s legacy if he croaked?”
With THAT statement, I could not agree more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.