Posted on 09/26/2008 8:35:05 AM PDT by SE Mom
Just delivered:
September 26, 2008
The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
Speaker of the House
H-232, U.S. Capitol
Washington, D.C. 20515
Madame Speaker:
As our discussion ended last night, we agreed to continue talking about how to best solve this economic crisis. Like you, House Republicans and I believe we must address this crisis quickly and in a way that protects the interests of families, seniors, small businesses, and all taxpayers. As you know, this process is not about faceless executives on Wall Street, but about keeping families in their homes, safeguarding their retirement security, college savings, and bank accounts, and protecting their jobs.
Over the last week, we have frequently discussed Secretary Paulson’s proposal, and I have repeatedly expressed the need for improvements on behalf of myself and my Republican colleagues. Our staffs have also been in regular contact. To that end, Financial Services Committee Ranking Member Spencer Bachus (R-AL) was tasked by House Republicans to engage in discussions with Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) and Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) and report back to our Conference on the progress of those negotiations before a final deal could be made. Yet Chairman Frank and Chairman Dodd, on several occasions over the last several days, announced that a bipartisan deal was at hand even though the reservations about the underlying proposal I had expressed to you had not been addressed. Each time such announcements were made, or even rumored, I or my staff made it clear to media and to your staff that any such deal did not include House Republicans.
As we demonstrated at the beginning of this year when we crafted a timely agreement on the economic stimulus package, a bipartisan response to our nation’s priorities is never out of reach. And I believe the same holds true at this hour. House Republicans are prepared to stay in Washington to forge an agreement on a proposal that reflects the core free-market, pro-taxpayer principles of our Party.
With that in mind, earlier this week, with your knowledge, I directed our Chief Deputy Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) to lead a working group of House Republicans to develop a package of ideas to move this process forward. His working group represented a broad cross-section of House Republicans – including both moderate and conservative members – and their goal was to develop ideas worthy of support on both sides of the aisle. We have discussed some of these ideas, and I would like to reiterate that I believe they should be given the consideration they deserve as our economic rescue discussions continue. A brief overview of the working group’s blueprint is included with this letter.
Madam Speaker, we owe it to all those with a stake in this process to continue our discussions until we arrive at an agreement that is acceptable on both sides of the aisle – and more importantly, one that serves the interests of American taxpayers. That is why I ask you and your Democratic colleagues to give the House Republican working group’s proposals serious consideration as this process moves forward. If such consideration is not given, a large majority of Republicans cannot – and will not – support Sec. Paulson’s plan. In the interest of the men and women we represent in Congress, I hope it does not come to that conclusion. I look forward to your timely response and to continuing our work together on an economic rescue package worthy of all of our support.
Sincerely,
John Boehner
Republican Leader
HOUSE REPUBLICAN WORKING GROUP – ECONOMIC RESCUE PRINCIPLES
I. Wall Street – Not Taxpayers – Should Fund the Recovery
The most troubling part of Sec. Paulson’s plan is that it relies wholly on taxpayer funds. House Republicans believe that rather than providing taxpayer funded purchases of frozen mortgage assets to solve this problem, any rescue package should adopt a plan to insure mortgage backed securities (MBS) through payment of insurance premiums.
Currently, the federal government insures approximately half of all MBS and can insure the rest of those still outstanding. However, rather than taxpayers funding the insurance, the holders of these assets should pay for it. The working group’s proposal would direct the Treasury Department to design a system to charge premiums to the holders of MBS to fully finance this insurance.
II. Private Capital – Not Tax Dollars – Should Be Injected Into Financial Markets
Instead of injecting taxpayer funds into the market to produce liquidity, private capital can be drawn into the market by removing burdensome regulatory and tax barriers that are currently blocking private capital formation. In short, too much private capital is sitting on the sidelines during this crisis, and it is well past time to unleash it.
Temporary tax relief provisions can help companies free up capital to maintain operations, create jobs, and lend to one another. In addition, the working group recommends a temporary suspension of dividend payments by financial institutions and other regulatory measures to address the problems surrounding private capital liquidity.
III. Immediate Transparency, Oversight, and Market Reform
Both Republicans and Democrats have made clear that they believe there is not a strong enough oversight component in Sec. Paulson’s plan. The House Republican working group’s proposal addresses this flaw. To begin, the plan would require participating firms to disclose to the Treasury Department the value of their mortgage assets on their books, the value of any private bids within the last year for such assets, and their last audit report. Additional safeguards include:
To limit federal exposure for high risk loans, the working group’s recommendations mandate that Government Sponsored Entities no longer securitize any unsound mortgages.
The plan would call on the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) to audit reports of failed companies to ensure that the financial standing of these troubled companies was accurately portrayed.
The blueprint would guarantee that Wall Street executives do not benefit from taxpayer funding.
The proposal would call on the SEC to review the performance of the credit rating agencies and their ability to accurately reflect the risks of these failed investment securities.
The working group recommends that Congress create a blue ribbon panel with representatives of Treasury, SEC, and the Federal Reserve Board to make recommendations to Congress for reforms of the financial sector by January 1, 2009.
09/26 11:15 AM
GOP Principles and Letter ping
The only question to which Boehner is likely to get an honest answer from Pelosi is, “Madam Speaker, when and where do you want the Republicans to begin slitting their wrists?”
Thank you for your diligence in posting.
And thank you for this info.
What? I thought we were funding ACORN?
It is time to fight, fight, FIGHT!!!!
Not if the GOP has anything to say about it.
Remember- yesterday in New York McC said NO EARMARKS.
All congressional Republicans must get behind this proposal and oppose the Bush-0bama $700 Billion Bailout. Senator McCain should use the debate tonight to sell this alternative to the American people.
If Republicans, lead by Senator McCain, show a united front, they can get this passed and thwart the nationalization of investment risk.
Ya....I was being sarcastic.
Thanks for the post. To me this is so much more constructive than just saying no to any plan. My only fear is that the grassroots Rublications (read most Freepers) will continue to resist this and we will either get no deal or a deal that has all kinds of Dem pork in it (like ACORN). I will be very interested in hearing the debate tonight!
Yep, if the Democrats inisit upon tying a millstone around someone’s neck, let it be their own.
Realistically- neither side is going to get all of what they want. The GOP is in the minority. That doesn’t mean we lay down and die. We call, call, call our Congressmen.
When I call mine today- I am telling them NO ACORN, NO LA RAZA, NO LABOR UNION earmarks. And.no mark to markup for value.
That continues one of the toughest nuts to crack- how to determine a fair price for these “assets”..
This only exposes the utter, complete contempt & disregard with which our government has viewed us. It’s nearly incomprehensible that these are “new” ideas.
And these are the people who want to reinvent our health care system?
“That continues one of the toughest nuts to crack- how to determine a fair price for these “assets”..”
The free market is the best determinant of fair price. List them on eBay.
Funding ACORN and banning oil shale drilling. You know - important stuff that is intimately related to the bailout.
*cough*
Why would grassroots Republican and most FReepers, in your words, resist this plan? Especially when looking at the charity bailout alternative? Your post does not make sense to me.
“List them on eBay.”
“Up for bids are a dozen Fortune 500 companies. Their value is unknown because they’re cooked their books for an indeterminate time, preferring to plow any “profits” into the pockets of their execs & various government officials. And the auditors they’ve hired to cover this up are all under investigation for fraud.”
I am so confused on what’s going on. Where does this 700 billion go? Does this money sit in some sort account and given out to the appropiate comapnies? Who is chage of giving out this money? Why not just let these people be able to re-finance their homes or adjust the payments to what it used to be so we can keep the 700 billion? What does this have to do with people’s savings, 401k’s ect?
Obviously I am not a finance major but there has to be a better “common sense” solution rather than throwing 700 billion at the problem? Also, people had better start going to jail over this debacle. Namely people like BARNEY FRANK FOR ONE!
I hear folks talking about rescuing people who took out irresponsible mortgages. How would this address that issue (hopefully, it won't)?
Owl_Eagle
There are people who are surrounded by bigots
and know it is wrong, but are afraid to be vocal against it.
These people are going to pull the lever for Obama
and they are not being polled.
angee_is_mad, DUmmy
The deal filled with pork and earmarks (including monies for ACORN) and the 700 billion bailout bill are two different bills. The first already passed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.