Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK banks hold £95bn of sour assets that could qualify for US bailout plan ($175bn to UK)
Times of London ^ | 09/26/08 | Miles Costello

Posted on 09/26/2008 5:10:33 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

UK banks hold £95bn of sour assets that could qualify for US bailout plan

Miles Costello

Britain’s five leading high street banks have as much as £95.3 billion ($175 billion) of distressed assets on their books that may qualify for the American bailout scheme.

If the British banks tap the rescue fund being set up by the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve to the maximum, they could secure one quarter of the $700 billion being made available. Under the terms of an outline agreement that appeared to have been reached by US policymakers last night, Britain’s lenders will be able to use the facility.

However, the prospect that the US Treasury could pay for UK banks’ bad assets is likely to infuriate some American politicians and taxpayers, who would foot the bill. As Congress edged closer to agreeing a plan for the central bank to take on lenders’ toxic assets, HSBC appeared to be the UK-based bank best placed to benefit.

Combined, the five British lenders hold securities worth $175 billion, which they could transfer to a federally backed Treasury fund. Under the proposed terms of the rescue package, non-US financial institutions must have significant operations in America to qualify.

(Excerpt) Read more at business.timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 700billion; bailout; banks; financialcrisis; subprime; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 09/26/2008 5:10:34 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Uncle Ike; RSmithOpt; jiggyboy; 2banana; Travis McGee; OwenKellogg; 31R1O; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 09/26/2008 5:11:10 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
However, the prospect that the US Treasury could pay for UK banks’ bad assets is likely to infuriate some American politicians and taxpayers, who would foot the bill.

No $hit, Sherlock, and infuriate is too mild of a word choice.

3 posted on 09/26/2008 5:15:49 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (don't worry, they only want to take water out of the other guy's side of the bucket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I can’t really bring myself to being okay with this...

If they bought crappy investments they should go after who they bought them from, not the US taxpayers.


4 posted on 09/26/2008 5:16:06 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Yes, that’s one of those trick questions:

Which foreign country holds the most US assets?

Not Japan, not China— it’s the UK.


5 posted on 09/26/2008 5:20:24 AM PDT by Yanni.Znaio (On the Palin smears: "Let he who is without stones cast the first sin.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB

These toxic assets weren’t sold like you would sell a car - they were sold with strings attached, which are now pulling. The assets were insured by the sellers against, for instance, fraud. Otherwise the British banks would not have brought them.

The toxic mortgage assets are legally-binding contracts, and the British banks read the fine print.


6 posted on 09/26/2008 5:25:50 AM PDT by agere_contra (It's 'We the People', not 'We the Media')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

UBS, the Swiss bank also qualifies for billions in the bailout. And who runs the UBS investment bank in the US?

WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS INVESTMENT BANK/BANKER 4/10/07 $15,000 Democratic Senatorial Campaign Cmte (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
NEW YORK,NY 10171 UBS AMERICAS INC./CHAIRMAN 9/29/06 $10,000 Democratic Congressional Campaign Cmte (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS INVESTMENT BANK/BANKER 4/28/06 $10,000 Democratic Senatorial Campaign Cmte (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS INVESTMENT BANK/BANKER 7/29/06 $10,000 Democratic Senatorial Campaign Cmte (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS AMERICAS INC./CHAIRMAN 7/31/07 $5,000 Democratic Congressional Campaign Cmte (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS GROUP AMERICAS/CEO & CHAIRMAN 7/14/08 $2,300 Clinton, Hillary (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS INVESTMENT BANK/CEO & CHAIRMAN 9/4/07 $2,300 Emanuel, Rahm (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS/INVESTMENT BANKER 3/20/08 $2,300 Kerry, John (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS/BANKER 3/18/08 $2,300 Warner, Mark (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS SECURITIES 8/6/06 $2,100 Dodd, Christopher J (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
NEW YORK,NY 10019 UBS AMERICAS/CEO 2/28/07 $2,100 Obama, Barack (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS SECURITIES/BANKING EXECUTIVE 8/6/06 $2,100 Dodd, Christopher J (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS INVESTMENT BANK/CHIEF OPERATING 7/31/06 $2,100 Ford, Harold E Jr (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS INVESTMENT BANK/CHIEF OPERATING 9/26/06 $2,000 Frank, Barney (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS INVESTMENT BANK/BANKING 8/16/06 $2,000 Lamont, Ned (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS INVESTMENT BANK/CHIEF OPERATING 9/25/06 $2,000 Farrell, Diane Goss (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS INVESTMENT BANK 6/8/05 $2,000 Clinton, Hillary (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
NEW YORK,NY 10017 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK/INVESTOR 10/30/06 $2,000 Lieberman, Joe (I)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS/CEO OF UBS AMERICAS 5/8/08 $2,000 Baucus, Max (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS INVESTMENT BANK/COO 3/26/07 $2,000 Durbin, Dick (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS-IB/COO 3/30/08 $2,000 Lowey, Nita M (D)
Wolf, Robert
Purchase,NY 10577 UBS Group America’s 7/31/08 $2,000 Obama, Barack (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS/CFO 9/30/06 $2,000 Lieberman, Joe (I)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS-IB/COO 10/19/06 $2,000 Lowey, Nita M (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
NEW YORK,NY 10022 UBS INVESTMENT BANK 3/28/07 $1,500 Clinton, Hillary (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS/CEO 12/7/07 $1,000 Johnson, Tim (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS WARBURG/MANAGING 3/24/08 $1,000 Murphy, Patrick J (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
MONROE,NY 10950 SELF/ATTORNEY 5/14/08 $1,000 Wexler, Robert (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS 6/29/05 $1,000 Lieberman, Joe (I)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS INVESTMENT BANK/CHIEF OPERATING 4/14/05 $1,000 CHRIS PAC (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS/COO UBS-IB CHARIMAN AMERICAS 10/11/06 $1,000 Arcuri, Michael (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS/BANKING 8/24/07 $900 Harkin, Tom (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS INVESTMENT BANK/BANKER 8/18/06 $500 Democratic Senatorial Campaign Cmte (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
NEW YORK,NY 10022 GERSTEN SAVAGE LLP/PARTNER 4/20/06 $500 Kean, Thomas H Jr (R)
WOLF, ROBERT
NEW YORK,NY 10021 BRIAN CAVE/ATTORNEY 6/29/07 $250 Clinton, Hillary (D)
WOLF, ROBERT
NEW YORK,NY 10019 UBS AMERICAS/CEO 3/30/07 $200 Obama, Barack (D)
WOLF, ROBERT MR
PURCHASE,NY 10577 UBS WARBURG/MANAGING 3/17/06 $10,000 DNC Services Corp (D)


7 posted on 09/26/2008 5:26:57 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

I understand that but their contracts were not with the US government. The US government doesn’t need to be on the hook for other parties contracts unless we, the US, represented that we would guarantee those financial instruments.


8 posted on 09/26/2008 5:33:58 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DB

Well, DB, you’re just plain wrong. The U.S. is a free-market, capitalist paradise. The vey paragon of how economies should be run. Until the sh*t hits the fan and the Big Boy are about to take it in the shorts. Then it’s up to the Government and the taxpayers to fix their mistakes. Until they start turning a profit again, then its back to the free-market, capitalist paradise.


9 posted on 09/26/2008 5:38:10 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Oh well...


10 posted on 09/26/2008 5:41:08 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

How about we buy them back at $.20 on the dollar?


11 posted on 09/26/2008 5:43:39 AM PDT by listenhillary (Community organizing has brought Wall Street to it's knees.That WAS the plan, right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

We could make money at that fire sale price.


12 posted on 09/26/2008 5:47:32 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

interesting, thanks


13 posted on 09/26/2008 5:50:05 AM PDT by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DB

“I can’t really bring myself to being okay with this...

If they bought crappy investments they should go after who they bought them from, not the US taxpayers.”

The same goes for anybody who bought such investments.


14 posted on 09/26/2008 5:57:38 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
And we all go down together...
15 posted on 09/26/2008 5:58:15 AM PDT by Earthdweller (Socialism makes you feel better about oppressing people.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

If the US treasury is going to effectively write off these debts, and some of those debts are held by foreign banks,then why should those foreign banks not claim in exactly the same way that US banks will?

Besides, this works the other way round too. The UK government has already bailed out one bank, and negotiated a merger between two others (probably illegally) in order to prop them up. No doubt some US investments have been shored up by those measures.


16 posted on 09/26/2008 6:01:15 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DB

“The US government doesn’t need to be on the hook for other parties contracts unless we, the US, represented that we would guarantee those financial instruments.”

Quite so. However, the US government now HAS represented that they are guaranteeing financial investments. If they are doing that, then they must be doing it for everyone who has a hand in a particular series of investments.

This is the thing with bailouts. They solve a problem true, but at the expense of creating others


17 posted on 09/26/2008 6:05:27 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Quite a rogues gallery there!


18 posted on 09/26/2008 6:06:15 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Screw those limey bastards.

I may die poor, but at least I'll die free!

19 posted on 09/26/2008 6:31:03 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo (You can put lipstick on a donkey, but it's still just a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB

the crappy investments amount to that spent of buying up the bad debt of a number of US banks. we have done that this year, at your behest to try and prop up your failing system.

that we can potentially get your money back is a great thing, if a little unexpected. how do you think we, the British taxpayer felt, when our banks were told to buy up your bad debt??

pretty much the same as you might be feeling now i would suggest.


20 posted on 09/26/2008 8:44:17 AM PDT by Mercia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson