Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DB

These toxic assets weren’t sold like you would sell a car - they were sold with strings attached, which are now pulling. The assets were insured by the sellers against, for instance, fraud. Otherwise the British banks would not have brought them.

The toxic mortgage assets are legally-binding contracts, and the British banks read the fine print.


6 posted on 09/26/2008 5:25:50 AM PDT by agere_contra (It's 'We the People', not 'We the Media')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: agere_contra

I understand that but their contracts were not with the US government. The US government doesn’t need to be on the hook for other parties contracts unless we, the US, represented that we would guarantee those financial instruments.


8 posted on 09/26/2008 5:33:58 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: agere_contra

That’s why we have let these companies fail. The holders of the worthless paper can go after the bankrupt companies and the taxpayer will have dodged that bullet.


30 posted on 09/26/2008 10:08:46 PM PDT by Tempest (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNlXgzzdJQA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson