Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snarkytart

In 2000 Ras was terrible, calling it +5/+6 for Bush all the time. That was way off. In 2004, he got it right.

Now, he may be oversampling Republicans again. If he calls it O +2, it may be closer to O +3/+4, imo. Yesterday was obviously a very bad polling day for McCain, for no clear reason.

To win, McCain needs to hold all five of CO, VA, NV, OH and FL.
If the election took place today, McCain would lose CO (definitely), VA (likely) and possibly NV and OH as well. He is in about the same shape Kerry was before the first debate. Kerry managed to make it closer, though never quite got back to even in the RCP average.


46 posted on 09/24/2008 7:10:26 AM PDT by ubaldus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: ubaldus

Nonsense. McCain is ahead right now in VA and OH.


47 posted on 09/24/2008 7:12:17 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: ubaldus
Now, he may be oversampling Republicans again. If he calls it O +2, it may be closer to O +3/+4, imo. Yesterday was obviously a very bad polling day for McCain, for no clear reason.

Why do you think he is oversampling Republicans? He says on his website that he is weighting by party based on a six point plus spread for Democrats (which is too high).

I just crunched some numbers and am beginning to suspect that last night had to be an outlier (which, statistically, happens about 5% of the time). Using Microsoft Excel, fancy math, and some guesswork, I determined that Obama never polled higher than 50 and lower than 47 on any night from 9/13 to 9/22. But to get the result he got today, he had to have pulled 53 last night. This was after he pulled 47 the night before. No way he jumped six points in one night. [Note: I don't actually know what the nightly snapshot numbers are -- this is educated guesswork using Excel. I do know that these nightly numbers on my Excel chart are consistend with Scott's reported results for this period.]

Also, it isn't that McCain had a bad night yesterday if you look just at his numbers. Again, using educated guesswork and Microsoft Excel, I figured that from 9/13 to 9/22 McCain's nightly numbers ranged from 45 to 49. Last night he polled 46, which is pretty much in the fairway of what he has been polling.

Using common sense, nothing happened yesterday that would cause a bunch of undecided voters to switch to Obama, especially when McCain apparently didn't lose any support at the same time. So, I'm guessing that Scott just had a bad sample last night.

67 posted on 09/24/2008 7:44:19 AM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: ubaldus

Yep, his “portraitofAmerica” had Bush winning by 9 in ‘00... His site went belly-up right after that


74 posted on 09/24/2008 7:55:13 AM PDT by NYC Republican (Infuriate the MSM- vote for Palin/McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson