And to note in this article, McCain and Bush HATE each other! They're not allies. They'll never be allies. 2000 took care of that.
It's just one more lying turd to add to the ten thousand piles of steaming marxist media bullshite that's already been spewed the past year.
sigh
You are right about trying to tie Bush to McCain — they do HATE each other and the more I learn the more I become on the side of McCain — what was done to him in 2000 was terrible and Rove should be ashamed. I am ashamed I swallowed the Rove koolaid in 2000 and attacked McCain using facts that were presented which turned out to be not exactly factual to be kind.
Now to my favorite part of the article which stated lots of Republicans are not voting against Obama because of his race but because we won’t vote for any Democrat for President — white, black, brown. That sums it up perfectly and why calling Republicans that won’t vote for Obama racists is so stupid and ignorant!
Title correction...
Radical views steer voters away from Obama
I bet Hillary would add... undependable.
barry’s RACISM steers WHITES dims from zero.
LLS
The Democrats and their allies in the media smell defeat, and in desperation are turning to the race card to explain their loss. Race will replace “Swiftboating” and Florida as an excuse for defeat.
Don’t like saying it, but this poll has some value for undedcided Dems.
Lots of Dems are going to see that lots of Dems are not voting for Barry. That may give many the ok to join that group.
They are probably tired of being called racists.
Why would anyone vote for a guy who constantly plays the race card against them?
Nice spin by Fournier... The white Dem is the racist. Not Obama.
Search Wright = No Text Found. Search Trinity United = No Text Found. Search Bitter = No Text Found.
It’s Obama who sat in a racist church for 20 YEARS. Not the white Dems. But why bother with facts.
I have known this all my life. My very liberal parents are very racist.
You see blacks are inferior and they need caretakers. Whites have the obligation to be caretakers and therefore our government is obligated to act in place of the benevolent slave master.
The theory is we can elect a black person to lesser offices because this is no different than appointing someone as a sharecropper. But how can we elect someone inferior who needs a caretaker to be the master?
A lot of Democrats are not thrilled with Senator Obama because besides the inexperience factor, he’s too much tied to the Chicago political machine (which a lot of Democrats don’t like) and Obama’s friends that have a really sketchy past.
Whites would be wise to not vote for Obama. He presented himself as the post-racial candidate, but has proven to be anything but. He is obsessed with race (he brings it up more then anyone), and the teachings of the church he attended for twenty plus years are alone reason enough to not vote for him.
Obama has the white guilt vote wrapped up, but it’s good to know that some white Dems. are able to extract themselves from that group psychosis and consider other factors.
Snort.
FWIW, the guy's a freaking socialist. I could give a rat's hairy hind end about his skin color. Or gender for that matter.
Why do people give any credence to this drivel. Repeat after me, MSM, “Those who oppose Barak Obama do so because they reject his failed ideas and pitiful performance at every previous position.” The real racists in this campaign are those who put up the unqualified Obama. If he were a white male, would you even consider him? I don’t think so. Racism works both ways,you MSM fools.
It's a "racial misgiving" to say that blacks, like all other grownups, are "responsible for their own troubles"?
99% of black Democrats are racist.
33% of white Democrats are racist.
Interesting that Republicans are labled the racist party. hmmm.
Obama’s OWN racist views should cost him the election.