Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stocks surge on report of entity for bad debt
Yahoo Finance ^ | 9/18/2008 | Tim Paradis

Posted on 09/18/2008 12:38:31 PM PDT by politicket

NEW YORK (AP) -- Wall Street surged higher Thursday, with the Dow Jones industrials up more than 400 points after a report that the federal government is considering creation of a repository for banks' bad debt. CNBC said Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is considering creation of an entity like the Resolution Trust Corp. that was formed after the failure of savings and loan banks in the 1980s.

(Excerpt) Read more at biz.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banks; economy; fobaproa; government; govwatch; hangtodayskenlays; housingbubble; marines; resolution; trust; wallstreet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-229 next last
To: politicket

IN the end, the Resolution Trust Corporation worked.

If we can do this like we did that, it’s not a bad solution.

Of course, there are no details.


41 posted on 09/18/2008 12:59:52 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss

Seems to me this is the difference between getting food poisoning and living through it now (RTC-type solution) or eating arsenic and hoping they can bring you back to life later (letting the banking industry fail).


42 posted on 09/18/2008 1:00:43 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire
The Feds briefly take ownership, but the point of the RTC is to broker deals to with private entities who will take the properties off the Fed's hands (with the help of Fed financing of that purchase).

The new private owner, sells the property at a more modest pace since it's not going to go bankrupt any second, repays RTC loan plus interest and gives the RTC a cut of the profit to boot.

I may be mistaken, but the reality of the last time we used this model the Feds actually MADE a great deal of money in the end.
43 posted on 09/18/2008 1:01:17 PM PDT by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PhilosopherStones
These mortgages are backed by real property

In many areas, the property will bring at auction 60% or less of the face value of the mortgage. The question is, do the taxpayers become the bagholders for that 40%?? We already know the answer, don't we?

44 posted on 09/18/2008 1:01:28 PM PDT by Notary Sojac (America's never won a "war" unless the enemy was named using a proper noun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Correct.


45 posted on 09/18/2008 1:01:28 PM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Domandred
Hello Socialism. Hope you enjoy you’re stay

Hank Paulson's New America:

- You are born in the State Owned Hospital, which was nationalized due to the Health Care Cost Crisis

- You attend government schools, of course, which were the first of the Great Socialist Entities

- You live in government owned housing, because of course, Private Ownership Is Far Too Risky. Of course, you must be an obedient little Prole, or else No House.

- You buy your insurance from the State Owned Insurance Company, because of course, We Must Not Let The Insurer Fight the Ill Winds of Competition. They're Sacred, ya know.

- Your job as an adult will of course be in the Bowels of the Benificent Government, which Owns All, For the Good of All.

Ah, the New America...Land of the Free, right Comrade?

46 posted on 09/18/2008 1:01:55 PM PDT by Regulator (Obama = Mugabe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: politicket

The government surely helped greatly in causing this problem with loose money, requirements of lenders to loan to people who didn’t deserve it, servicing Fan and Fred’s house of cards, and bad accounting rules.

That the Government then has to clean up a mess that big is probably inevitable.

But will they learn?

No. Get ready. Money is loose again, and the next bubble is being inflated somewhere right now.


47 posted on 09/18/2008 1:02:06 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Palin for President! (Who was that old fogey she was with?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user
Don't worry, the DOW will shave off 300-400 tomorrow.

My only concern for the Dow is that is behaved exactly the opposite of the way that it needed to today. I already know which way it is heading over the coming 6 months - and that is trending down.

My main concern is for the citizenry of this country that don't have a clue as to what just happened. If they did, there would be a march on Washington with sharp pitchforks.

48 posted on 09/18/2008 1:02:50 PM PDT by politicket (Palin-tology: (n) - The science of kicking Barack Obambi's butt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TheWasteLand

“It feels like an Ayn Rand novel. The looters, in bed with the government, are running the show.”

(Shrug)....LOL

What shall we call this new ‘entity’?

Perhaps the ‘Department of Redistribution’??


49 posted on 09/18/2008 1:02:50 PM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PhilosopherStones
These mortgages are backed by real property

In many areas, the property will bring at auction 60% or less of the face value of the mortgage. The question is, do the taxpayers become the bagholders for that 40%?? We already know the answer, don't we?

50 posted on 09/18/2008 1:02:54 PM PDT by Notary Sojac (America's never won a "war" unless the enemy was named using a proper noun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

YEE-HAA!

51 posted on 09/18/2008 1:03:43 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I don’t see any light at the end of the tunnel.


52 posted on 09/18/2008 1:03:58 PM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99
shorts covering, taking their profits.

You're exactly right. But the problem is that our U.S. government fraudulently forced them to, yet again.

53 posted on 09/18/2008 1:04:40 PM PDT by politicket (Palin-tology: (n) - The science of kicking Barack Obambi's butt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: freedom1st
Actually, I think it's closer to Nationalism.

As in National Socialism.

So we appear to both be right.

The Conservative Compendium - A Conservative Social Networking Site

54 posted on 09/18/2008 1:05:06 PM PDT by HeartlandOfAmerica (Don't blame me - I voted for Fred and am STILL a FredHead and will write him in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss

It is true that this rewards the bums (i.e. Obama voters) and penalizes — over the long term — the responsible.


55 posted on 09/18/2008 1:05:13 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

There is no ideal solution, but the alternative of letting the banking system to collapse is too scary to contemplate.

Those who think letting the banking system collapse will return us to old fashioned capitalism are dead dead wrong. It would instead lead to a new wave of FDR style socialism.


56 posted on 09/18/2008 1:05:47 PM PDT by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
IN the end, the Resolution Trust Corporation worked.

Worked for who?

57 posted on 09/18/2008 1:05:51 PM PDT by politicket (Palin-tology: (n) - The science of kicking Barack Obambi's butt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

This is a little like old age (a RTC type entity) and death (do nothing). It is not great but it does beat the alternative!!


58 posted on 09/18/2008 1:06:46 PM PDT by koraz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

One of the smarter posts I’ve seen on this thread. Thanks!


59 posted on 09/18/2008 1:08:01 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Daus
I may be mistaken, but the reality of the last time we used this model the Feds actually MADE a great deal of money in the end.

Tell that to the shareholders and bondholders. Our government should not be given the power to decide when it is "proper" to take over a private company. If a company does poor business, then it fails.

60 posted on 09/18/2008 1:08:35 PM PDT by politicket (Palin-tology: (n) - The science of kicking Barack Obambi's butt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-229 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson