Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barr Files Suit To Remove Obama And McCain From Texas Ballot
Austin American Statesman ^ | 9/16/08 | scott shepard

Posted on 09/16/2008 4:43:54 PM PDT by pissant

Libertarian presidential nominee Bob Barr’s campaign filed suit Tuesday seeking to remove Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama from the ballot in Texas, alleging that the two major candidates missed the deadline for officially filing to be on the ballot.

The lawsuit by the former Republican congressman from Georgia claims that neither McCain nor Obama met the requirement of Texas law that all candidates provide “written certification” of their nomination “before 5 p.m. on the 70th day before election day” because neither had been formally nominated by their respective parties in time.

That would have been Aug. 25. Obama did not accept his party’s nomination until Aug. 28, McCain his on Sept. 4.

The lawsuit states: “The hubris of the major parties has risen to such a level that they do not believe that the election laws of the State of Texas apply to them.”

Pat Dixon, chairman of the Texas Libertarian Party, issued a statement saying, “Libertarian principles require personal responsibility for your acts and failures. Obama and McCain failed to meet the deadlines. They must follow the law like everyone else.”

(Excerpt) Read more at statesman.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aclu; bobbarr; electionpresident; judiciary; lawsuit; libertarianparty; lp; mccain; mccainpalin; obama; obamabiden; patdixon; pathetic; professionalspoilers; sideshowbob; texasballot; thirdparty; tx2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 last
To: Gondring
So? So?!? So...it disproves your claim.

How so?

161 posted on 09/19/2008 3:54:01 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration ('we don't make compromises-we make Marines')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: All

Barr first raised the issue in a press release earlier this month. Ashley Burton, a spokesperson for the Texas Secretary of State’s office, responded at that time, saying, “Both parties made filings with our office before the deadline, supplemented their filings and will be on the November ballot.”


162 posted on 09/19/2008 4:09:54 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration ('we don't make compromises-we make Marines')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
Of course the same people calling Barr insane and worse were singing his praises when he was leading impeachment proceedings against Clinton.

He was right in impeaching Clinton, Clinton was obstructing justice.

How are those open borders coming along?

163 posted on 09/19/2008 4:12:06 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration ('we don't make compromises-we make Marines')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

You’ve got your facts completely wrong. The CP has been around since ‘92, and there’s only one election they have any claim to have won that I’m aware of: one legislative seat in MT.

I’m not a part of the CP, and I’m not a Libertarian.


164 posted on 09/19/2008 7:17:33 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Wise men beware the Bear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
How are those open borders coming along?

Perhaps you might want to talk with Juan McCain about that.

I just think it's amazing how prevalent the groupthink is here when someone leaves the party. Folks would do well to remember that this is a conservative site, not a republican one, and believe it or not that includes many folks with more libertarian leanings.



165 posted on 09/19/2008 7:47:09 AM PDT by zeugma (Mark Steyn For Global Dictator!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: goawaylibs
The chief benefit would deny McCain the TX electoral votes. When neither McCain nor Obama reach 270, the House of Representatives gets to decide. The lopsided majority of rats in the House will put Obama in the Oval Office.

Pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment, the House of Representatives is required to go into session "immediately" to vote for President if no candidate for President receives a majority (270 votes) of the 538 possible electoral votes.

In this event, the House of Representatives is limited to choosing from among the three candidates who received the most electoral votes. Each state delegation has a single vote. To be elected, a candidate must receive an absolute majority of state votes (26) in order for that candidate to become the President-elect. Additionally, delegations from at least two-thirds of all the states must be present for voting to take place. The House continues balloting until a candidate receives an absolute majority of the state votes. This situation would most likely occur only when more than two candidates receive electoral votes, but could happen in an election in which only two candidates receive electoral votes and each receives an equal number of electoral votes.
166 posted on 09/19/2008 5:54:24 PM PDT by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
[How are those open borders coming along?]

Perhaps you might want to talk with Juan McCain about that. I just think it's amazing how prevalent the groupthink is here when someone leaves the party. Folks would do well to remember that this is a conservative site, not a republican one, and believe it or not that includes many folks with more libertarian leanings.

My leanings are very libertarian as well,(forthe Declaration!), we were discussing the Libertarian Party and its attempt to undermine the Republican Party while claiming to be the 'Party of Principle'.

It takes alot of principle to allow the Democrats to win close elections while maintaining how 'pure' the Libertarian Party is.

167 posted on 09/19/2008 10:12:06 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration ('we don't make compromises-we make Marines')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
You’ve got your facts completely wrong. The CP has been around since ‘92, and there’s only one election they have any claim to have won that I’m aware of: one legislative seat in MT. I’m not a part of the CP, and I’m not a Libertarian.

No, my facts are correct.

Being around since 92 makes the Constitution Party a new Party in my view.

And that one win is one more contested election then the Libertarians have won, which have been around since the 1970's.

As for you being a member of either Party, I didn't say you were.

168 posted on 09/19/2008 10:16:59 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration ('we don't make compromises-we make Marines')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
It takes alot of principle to allow the Democrats to win close elections while maintaining how 'pure' the Libertarian Party is.

Personally, I have issues with the Libertarian party as well, but I think it's kinda nice to have an alternative to socialist party A or socialist party B. Noone is forced to vote for any LP candidate, and in fact the entire media (both right and left leaning) demonizes them beyond all recognition IMO.

If the Republican Party wants to get the votes of folks who would prefer liberty to socialism and creeping tyranny, they should stand up for the liberty of the individual more often.

169 posted on 09/19/2008 11:35:14 PM PDT by zeugma (Mark Steyn For Global Dictator!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
[It takes alot of principle to allow the Democrats to win close elections while maintaining how 'pure' the Libertarian Party is.]

Personally, I have issues with the Libertarian party as well, but I think it's kinda nice to have an alternative to socialist party A or socialist party B. Noone is forced to vote for any LP candidate, and in fact the entire media (both right and left leaning) demonizes them beyond all recognition IMO. If the Republican Party wants to get the votes of folks who would prefer liberty to socialism and creeping tyranny, they should stand up for the liberty of the individual more often.

Yea, that is the typical Libertarian Party line but the fact is that most are just anarchists who just want to see all form of Government ended.

The only real alternative to the GOP is the Democratic Party, not the Libertarian Party which hasn't placed a single candidate in office by winning a contested election.

If any Libertarian were concerned about moving the GOP rightward, they would join it, but that would mean actually making a commitment to a Political Party that wants to govern not just talk.

170 posted on 09/20/2008 4:51:32 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration ('we don't make compromises-we make Marines')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson