[Servant of the Cross]

And the bottom line answer is "Yes" the ad is fair. This was sex education straight from the liberal condoms/cucumbers public school union lobby playbook, and it changed existing law from grade 6-12 to Kindergarten-12! Byron York examines the actual bill, it's sponsors and supporters.

While ads about lipstick and sex-ed don't equate with violations of the Logan Act, they all point to how much of an audacious liar Barack Obama is.

[gondramB]

Well, the ad is not honest because the kindergarden program was about avoiding bad touching.

But after what they did Sarah Palin’s kids, it just doesn’t bother me as much.

[waus]

Direct link to the bill:

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/fulltext.asp?DocName=&SessionId=3&GA=93&DocTypeId=SB&DocNum=99&GAID=3&LegID=734&SpecSess=&Session

[thefrankbaum]

I have a problem with the ad, only in that it uses the word “accomplishment.” That denotes that the bill actually was passed and has the force of law - clearly, that isn’t so. There are better ways to phrase it that get the point across without getting into the grey areas of what constitutes an “accomplishment.”

[Baladas]

Tell that to that retard Bill O’Reilly - he keeps describing this ad as “false”, I’ve stopped watching his show because of this.

BFD, Barack Hussein Obama said “age appropriate”. He endorsed comprehensive sex ed for children as young as five and struck out language in the bill to put it off to sixth grade and up.

[Rippin]

Why should the state mandate that local districts have any sex ed at all in their curricula? Why can’t parents decide locally?

[supercat]

BTW, I think someone should also point out that the bill seems to eliminate all reference of marriage from sex education curricula.