Skip to comments.
Russian nuclear bombers relive Soviet glory
AFP ^
| September 14, 2008
Posted on 09/14/2008 9:59:36 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Tailgunner Joe
Hmmmm...., Let’s see how 10 Russian fighters would fare against a single F-22 Raptor. I’ve got $10.000 I’ll wager on the outcome....
2
posted on
09/14/2008 10:02:36 PM PDT
by
freebilly
To: Tailgunner Joe
"I think the fighter jets are also happy. The young pilots can see our planes, see how beautiful they are." LOL ....in a museum artifact kind of way.
3
posted on
09/14/2008 10:31:31 PM PDT
by
spetznaz
(Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
To: Tailgunner Joe
The good ole days of bread lines, shared apartments, and sailors earning $10 a month.
4
posted on
09/14/2008 10:32:18 PM PDT
by
Citizen Soldier
(Made in USA and proud of it.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
"the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the [20th] century" -Russian leader Vladimir Putin on the collapse of the Soviet Union...
"World democratic opinion has yet to realize the alarming implications of President Vladimir Putin's State of the Union speech on April 25, 2005, in which he said that
the collapse of the Soviet Union represented the 'greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century.'
http://www.hooverdigest.org/053/beichman.html
5
posted on
09/14/2008 10:41:47 PM PDT
by
ETL
(Smoking gun evidence on ALL the ObamaRat-commie connections at my newly revised FR Home page)
To: freebilly
Depends on fighter, but more modern ones would give you a rude and expensive surprise. They would take casualties, heavy casualties, but in the end the Raptor would be simply overwhelmed.
F-22 is the best fighter on planet, agreed. It's also the most expensive and it is not magic. And the other side is far more willing to accept casualties than USA.
6
posted on
09/14/2008 10:43:15 PM PDT
by
MirrorField
(Just an opinion from atheist, minarchist and small-l libertarian.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
send a jet version of the predator with a couple of missiles on it to fly escort; or maybe cruise missiles.
Could someone provide a pic please!
7
posted on
09/14/2008 10:56:48 PM PDT
by
Herakles
(Diversity is code word for anti-white racism)
To: MirrorField
No, the F-22 isn’t magic, but there’s no other fighter in the world, in production, that can even remotely measure up to its capabilities. Now if the Russians want to spend billions upon billions developing a stealth version of the SU-37 then there just might be a fighter that can stack up against the Raptor....
8
posted on
09/14/2008 11:00:56 PM PDT
by
freebilly
To: MirrorField
read up on the raptor’s capabilities. you may wish to retract your statenents...
9
posted on
09/14/2008 11:25:22 PM PDT
by
steel_resolve
(We are living in the post-rational world where being a moron is an asset)
To: MirrorField
The Russians don't have the number of aircraft to do that, nor the aircrews, training, maintenance, spare parts, secure command and control.
Other than that, everything should be fine.
10
posted on
09/15/2008 12:31:25 AM PDT
by
Leisler
To: freebilly
Sounds like you drink way too much zoomie kool-aid.
To: freebilly
Some benny arnold will just sell of give the F-22s plans to the russians or chi-coms someday.
12
posted on
09/15/2008 4:30:33 AM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
(An enemy of Islam)
To: Tailgunner Joe
How quaint. The Russian KGB moron is feeling his oil money oats. Staging strategic bombers on an airfield and inviting the public for tours only serves to puff up the ego's of his own nationalists. Those airplanes have a zero survivability against even a Vietnam era air defense. This has to be a diversion away from his redeployment of ICBMs. Meanwhile, Osama is handily planning to dismantle our missile shield.
To: A.A. Cunningham; Pukin Dog
I thought Pukin Dog debunked that photo?
Is he still gone?
14
posted on
09/15/2008 7:27:59 AM PDT
by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: GauchoUSA
There it is! Four days late and on the
wrong thread, but there it is.
15
posted on
09/15/2008 8:56:59 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
To: MirrorField
Russia also has the PAK-FA and Plasma Stealth capability, and an ability to detect stealth. That could give the F-22 some problems. However, even with stealth removed from the equasion, the F-22 can outclass any other aircraft (even PAK-FA and J-XX).
To: freebilly
That is why the Russians are developing the PAK-FA fighter.
17
posted on
09/16/2008 4:06:41 PM PDT
by
Tommyjo
To: bitterohiogunclinger
The Tu-160 is a stand-off nuclear ALCM carrier. Think B-52H used in the ALCM role. They don’t require to penetrate deep into airspace to achieve their aims. The Russians have the longest ranged ALCMs. The Tu-160s are part of the Russian nuclear triad the same as heavy strategic bombers are in the U.S. It is the speed and range of the Tu-160 that makes it a potent threat.
18
posted on
09/16/2008 4:12:56 PM PDT
by
Tommyjo
To: Tommyjo
Yeah, you’re right, but so far as I know, the PAK-FA hasn’t even begun flight testing. Flight testing can take several years before full production starts. By the time Russia starts full scale production of the PAK-FA the US (hopefully) will have started working on a Gen 6 fighter.
To: freebilly
There will be late model heavily upgraded F-22 Raptors in the skies by the time the first Su-50 PAK FA is commissioned in the VVS.
And the bomber that can match the performance of the Tu-160 is the proposed B-1R Lancer, nicknamed “Boner” as in B-One-R.
20
posted on
03/17/2009 3:21:00 AM PDT
by
myknowledge
(Nothing beats Australia's F-22EMA Raptor)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson