Replies

There was one other I couldn't locate that has an analysis of the Factcheck images. Guess what? The folds were done in Photoshop, not on a piece of real paper. Analysis of the pixels shows usage of the photoshop "fold" command.

The analysis also showed evidence of other commands to stretch and keystone a flat image into the angle shots shown on their website.

One thing that stuck out to me was that the certificate number was a different font size than any other text on the document. It was as if the were overcompensating for blacking it out earlier...

If someone who is not FIRMLY in the Obama camp actually sees a copy, I'd be more inclined to believe it.

A former employer, and fellow traveler? Not so much.

“Analysis of the pixels shows usage of the photoshop “fold” command.”

I like to keep an open mind about things, particularly in light of the Bush/Killian memo forgeries uncovered by freepers and conservative bloggers in 2004, but here’s a question...within a very short amount of time, certified forensic document examiners had reported their findings about the Killian memo forgeries, along with a host of other expert analysts...where are the expert forensic document examiners with respect to the Obama COLB? All we have so far is anonymous blogger “polarik,” and a mysterious “techdude” who promised he’d bring forth evidence and then promptly disappeared. Surely there are experts who would be happy to analyze the purported photos of the original COLB, the image of it posted on KOS, etc. They came out of the woodwork to analyze the Killian forgeries in 2004 - where are they on the Obama COLB?

I am working on my final report which includes statements to the effect that there is not ONE document photographed nine times, but at least four separate documents that were photographed. Please email me and tell me more about the fold command.

I noted that the "top fold" appears to be slanted upwards from left to right. Conversely, the "top fold" in the FactCheck image is perfectly horizontal from left to right.

The analysis also showed evidence of other commands to stretch and keystone a flat image into the angle shots shown on their website.

Darn, I noticed that, too! I'ver seen some other bizarre stuff, like hand prints on the shots of the reverse side. Notice, also, how the same, top part of the seal is cropped out on the reverse side pics.

One thing that stuck out to me was that the certificate number was a different font size than any other text on the document. It was as if the were overcompensating for blacking it out earlier...

It is supposed to be a different size and weight, like Arial Black.

If someone who is not FIRMLY in the Obama camp actually sees a copy, I'd be more inclined to believe it.

Fat chance of that!

There are a few more anomalies in the FactCheck photos: one that proves that the Exif data was deliberately changed. Photo #7 and Photo #9 were made to look like #7 was taken before Photo #8 and Phoito 9 after it. Except that Photo #9 is a zoomed in shot of Photo #7 because reducing Photo #9 by exactly 80 percent will yield the same sized date stamp image, taken at the same angle. The only thing different is a very slight tilt in #9, or what you'd expect after doing a zoom.

If the Exif data were not changed, the zoom factor would not be 1x.

My report will be out tonight or tomorrow morning.