I am working on my final report which includes statements to the effect that there is not ONE document photographed nine times, but at least four separate documents that were photographed. Please email me and tell me more about the fold command.
I noted that the "top fold" appears to be slanted upwards from left to right. Conversely, the "top fold" in the FactCheck image is perfectly horizontal from left to right.
The analysis also showed evidence of other commands to stretch and keystone a flat image into the angle shots shown on their website.
Darn, I noticed that, too! I'ver seen some other bizarre stuff, like hand prints on the shots of the reverse side. Notice, also, how the same, top part of the seal is cropped out on the reverse side pics.
One thing that stuck out to me was that the certificate number was a different font size than any other text on the document. It was as if the were overcompensating for blacking it out earlier...
It is supposed to be a different size and weight, like Arial Black.
If someone who is not FIRMLY in the Obama camp actually sees a copy, I'd be more inclined to believe it.
Fat chance of that!
There are a few more anomalies in the FactCheck photos: one that proves that the Exif data was deliberately changed. Photo #7 and Photo #9 were made to look like #7 was taken before Photo #8 and Phoito 9 after it. Except that Photo #9 is a zoomed in shot of Photo #7 because reducing Photo #9 by exactly 80 percent will yield the same sized date stamp image, taken at the same angle. The only thing different is a very slight tilt in #9, or what you'd expect after doing a zoom.
If the Exif data were not changed, the zoom factor would not be 1x.
My report will be out tonight or tomorrow morning.
Ping.