Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dimwittedness Might Actually Prevail (Palin Hit Piece)
NY Times ^ | 9/13/08 | nhwingut

Posted on 09/13/2008 2:01:55 PM PDT by nhwingut

While watching the Sarah Palin interview with Charlie Gibson Thursday night, and the coverage of the Palin phenomenon in general, I’ve gotten the scary feeling, for the first time in my life, that dimwittedness is not just on the march in the U.S., but that it might actually prevail.

How is it that this woman could have been selected to be the vice presidential candidate on a major party ticket? How is it that so much of the mainstream media has dropped all pretense of seriousness to hop aboard the bandwagon and go along for the giddy ride?

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: articulate; clean; hystericalmedia; mccain; mccainpalin; nytimes; obama; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: nhwingut; Admin Moderator

You changed the title and left off the author of this opinion piece.


21 posted on 09/13/2008 2:13:29 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (PALIN-MANIA ... I haz it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
That is not the title of the article. You are not helping our article search.
22 posted on 09/13/2008 2:14:03 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (What's "Price Gouging"? Should government force us to sell to the 15th highest bidder on eBay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
(the author)

Face it buddy, our #2 is better than your #1

Now available at cafepress.com

23 posted on 09/13/2008 2:14:43 PM PDT by chaos_5 (http://www.cafepress.com/chaos_5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
Dimwittedness Might Actually Prevail

It obviously does at the NYT.

24 posted on 09/13/2008 2:14:54 PM PDT by bcsco (Sarah America! Ignore the lipstik at your peril!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Bob Herbert = A cleaner, more articulate Reverend Wright.


25 posted on 09/13/2008 2:14:56 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

They’re going to have to put a straight jacket on Herbert on Nov 4th as the networks keep projecting more and more states going for McCain/Palin.

Speaking of dimwitts Bob, you have to be one of the biggest dimwitts working for the NY Slimes. And that’s saying a lot.

Keep publishing these articles NY Slimes, you are only having the effect of moving more and more women over to the McCain camp.


26 posted on 09/13/2008 2:14:58 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
Here's a dimwits bio page at the NYT....click on his email and enlighten his day

http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/bobherbert/index.html?inline=nyt-per

27 posted on 09/13/2008 2:15:25 PM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
How is it that this woman could have been selected to be the vice presidential candidate on a major party ticket?

How is it that they are so concerned over this issue with Governor Palin, but never ask the same question about B Hussein Obama, a man who has spent barely a year in the Senate before campaigning full-time for the presidency, and before that was simply a state senator who voted present over half the time?

28 posted on 09/13/2008 2:15:47 PM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I got it from RealClear. That was there title.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ Third story down.

My bad.


29 posted on 09/13/2008 2:16:00 PM PDT by nhwingut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Herbert is an African-American. He’s just doing and saying what the DNC trained him to do and say.


30 posted on 09/13/2008 2:16:10 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ("Whites lift McCain to slim lead over Obama in poll" - Ass. Press ---09-12-08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Dimwittedness? Is that even a word?

Spellcheck came up with dementedness as an alternative. Fits the author. LOL


31 posted on 09/13/2008 2:16:27 PM PDT by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
That is not the same answer!! Not even if you stretch a whole bunch which you have.
32 posted on 09/13/2008 2:17:18 PM PDT by org.whodat (Republicans should support the SAM Walton business model, and then drill???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
In other words, Dean Slaughter gave the same answer as did Palin.

Palin gave the perfect response. The Bush Doctrine is not a well defined term and Gibson's understanding isn't even the current conventional wisdom of what it means.

33 posted on 09/13/2008 2:17:34 PM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Yo, Bob. Ever hear your Messiah try to talk without a teleprompter?


34 posted on 09/13/2008 2:17:42 PM PDT by Interesting Times (Swiftboating, you say? Check out ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

I bet the same Rag said the same about Ronald Reagan too


35 posted on 09/13/2008 2:18:36 PM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Let not your heart be troubled -- the Old Grey Whore is in the midst of a long process of self-destruction. Stay healthy and you may yet see the death of that awful whore.

Witness this 5 year stock chart for NYT:


36 posted on 09/13/2008 2:19:10 PM PDT by webschooner (McWhatshisname/Palin 2008 !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
That is not the same answer!! Not even if you stretch a whole bunch which you have.

In essence they were. Both were asking for clarification.

37 posted on 09/13/2008 2:19:28 PM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
that dimwittedness is not just on the march in the U.S., but that it might actually prevail

Anyone who reads the MSM knows this has been true for awhile.

susie

38 posted on 09/13/2008 2:20:04 PM PDT by brytlea (Obama--Keep the change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Oh dear, the old gray lady has her knickers in a twist. If only a true woman, a liberal woman, a Chardonnay sipping woman were the nominee for VP.


39 posted on 09/13/2008 2:20:10 PM PDT by AdaGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

GTH, NY Slimes.


40 posted on 09/13/2008 2:21:29 PM PDT by KansasGirl (READ MY LIPSTICK!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson