Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC News Edited Out Key Parts of Sarah Palin Interview
Newsbusters ^ | 09/13/08 | P.J. Gladnick

Posted on 09/13/2008 5:08:24 AM PDT by coffee260

A transcript of the unedited interview of Sarah Palin by Charles Gibson clearly shows that ABC News edited out crucial portions of the interview that showed Palin as knowledgeable or presented her answers out of context. This unedited transcript of the first of the Gibson interviews with Palin is available on radio host Mark Levin's website. The sections edited out by ABC News are in bold. The first edit shows Palin responding about meeting with foreign leaders but this was actually in response to a question Gibson asked several questions earlier:

GIBSON: Have you ever met a foreign head of state?

PALIN: There in the state of Alaska, our international trade activities bring in many leaders of other countries.

GIBSON: And all governors deal with trade delegations.

PALIN: Right.

GIBSON: Who act at the behest of their governments.

PALIN: Right, right.

GIBSON: I’m talking about somebody who’s a head of state, who can negotiate for that country. Ever met one?

PALIN: I have not and I think if you go back in history and if you ask that question of many vice presidents, they may have the same answer that I just gave you. But, Charlie, again, we’ve got to remember what the desire is in this nation at this time. It is for no more politics as usual and somebody’s big, fat resume maybe that shows decades and decades in that Washington establishment, where, yes, they’ve had opportunities to meet heads of state … these last couple of weeks … it has been overwhelming to me that confirmation of the message that Americans are getting sick and tired of that self-dealing and kind of that closed door, good old boy network that has been the Washington elite.
 

Next we see that Palin was not nearly as hostile towards Russia as was presented in the edited interview:

GIBSON: Let me ask you about some specific national security situations.

PALIN: Sure.

GIBSON: Let’s start, because we are near Russia, let’s start with Russia and Georgia.

The administration has said we’ve got to maintain the territorial integrity of Georgia. Do you believe the United States should try to restore Georgian sovereignty over South Ossetia and Abkhazia?

PALIN: First off, we’re going to continue good relations with Saakashvili there. I was able to speak with him the other day and giving him my commitment, as John McCain’s running mate, that we will be committed to Georgia. And we’ve got to keep an eye on Russia. For Russia to have exerted such pressure in terms of invading a smaller democratic country, unprovoked, is unacceptable and we have to keep…

GIBSON: You believe unprovoked.

PALIN: I do believe unprovoked and we have got to keep our eyes on Russia, under the leadership there. I think it was unfortunate. That manifestation that we saw with that invasion of Georgia shows us some steps backwards that Russia has recently taken away from the race toward a more democratic nation with democratic ideals. That’s why we have to keep an eye on Russia.

And, Charlie, you’re in Alaska. We have that very narrow maritime border between the United States, and the 49th state, Alaska, and Russia. They are our next door neighbors.We need to have a good relationship with them. They’re very, very important to us and they are our next door neighbor.

GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?

PALIN: They’re our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.

GIBSON: What insight does that give you into what they’re doing in Georgia?

PALIN: Well, I’m giving you that perspective of how small our world is and how important it is that we work with our allies to keep good relation with all of these countries, especially Russia. We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it’s in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along.

We also see from Palin's following remark, which was also edited out, that she is far from some sort of latter day Cold Warrior which the edited interview made her seem to be:

We cannot repeat the Cold War. We are thankful that, under Reagan, we won the Cold War, without a shot fired, also. We’ve learned lessons from that in our relationship with Russia, previously the Soviet Union.

We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it’s in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along.

Palin's extended remarks about defending our NATO allies were edited out to make it seem that she was ready to go to war with Russia. 

GIBSON: And under the NATO treaty, wouldn’t we then have to go to war if Russia went into Georgia?

PALIN: Perhaps so. I mean, that is the agreement when you are a NATO ally, is if another country is attacked, you’re going to be expected to be called upon and help.

But NATO, I think, should include Ukraine, definitely, at this point and I think that we need to — especially with new leadership coming in on January 20, being sworn on, on either ticket, we have got to make sure that we strengthen our allies, our ties with each one of those NATO members.

We have got to make sure that that is the group that can be counted upon to defend one another in a very dangerous world today.

GIBSON: And you think it would be worth it to the United States, Georgia is worth it to the United States to go to war if Russia were to invade.

PALIN: What I think is that smaller democratic countries that are invaded by a larger power is something for us to be vigilant against. We have got to be cognizant of what the consequences are if a larger power is able to take over smaller democratic countries.

And we have got to be vigilant. We have got to show the support, in this case, for Georgia. The support that we can show is economic sanctions perhaps against Russia, if this is what it leads to.

It doesn’t have to lead to war and it doesn’t have to lead, as I said, to a Cold War, but economic sanctions, diplomatic pressure, again, counting on our allies to help us do that in this mission of keeping our eye on Russia and Putin and some of his desire to control and to control much more than smaller democratic countries.

His mission, if it is to control energy supplies, also, coming from and through Russia, that’s a dangerous position for our world to be in, if we were to allow that to happen.

That answer presented Palin as a bit too knowledgeable for the purposes of ABC News and was, of course, edited out. Palin's answers about a nuclear Iran were carefully edited to the point where she was even edited out in mid-sentence to make it seem that Palin favored unilateral action against that country:

GIBSON: Let me turn to Iran. Do you consider a nuclear Iran to be an existential threat to Israel?

PALIN: I believe that under the leadership of Ahmadinejad, nuclear weapons in the hands of his government are extremely dangerous to everyone on this globe, yes.

GIBSON: So what should we do about a nuclear Iran? John McCain said the only thing worse than a war with Iran would be a nuclear Iran. John Abizaid said we may have to live with a nuclear Iran. Who’s right?

PALIN: No, no. I agree with John McCain that nuclear weapons in the hands of those who would seek to destroy our allies, in this case, we’re talking about Israel, we’re talking about Ahmadinejad’s comment about Israel being the “stinking corpse, should be wiped off the face of the earth,” that’s atrocious. That’s unacceptable.

GIBSON: So what do you do about a nuclear Iran?

PALIN: We have got to make sure that these weapons of mass destruction, that nuclear weapons are not given to those hands of Ahmadinejad, not that he would use them, but that he would allow terrorists to be able to use them. So we have got to put the pressure on Iran and we have got to count on our allies to help us, diplomatic pressure.

GIBSON: But, Governor, we’ve threatened greater sanctions against Iran for a long time. It hasn’t done any good. It hasn’t stemmed their nuclear program.

PALIN: We need to pursue those and we need to implement those. We cannot back off. We cannot just concede that, oh, gee, maybe they’re going to have nuclear weapons, what can we do about it. No way, not Americans. We do not have to stand for that.

Laughably, a remark by Gibson that indicated he agreed with Palin was edited out:

PALIN: But the reference there is a repeat of Abraham Lincoln’s words when he said — first, he suggested never presume to know what God’s will is, and I would never presume to know God’s will or to speak God’s words.

But what Abraham Lincoln had said, and that’s a repeat in my comments, was let us not pray that God is on our side in a war or any other time, but let us pray that we are on God’s side.

That’s what that comment was all about, Charlie. And I do believe, though, that this war against extreme Islamic terrorists is the right thing. It’s an unfortunate thing, because war is hell and I hate war, and, Charlie, today is the day that I send my first born, my son, my teenage son overseas with his Stryker brigade, 4,000 other wonderful American men and women, to fight for our country, for democracy, for our freedoms.

Charlie, those are freedoms that too many of us just take for granted. I hate war and I want to see war ended. We end war when we see victory, and we do see victory in sight in Iraq.

GIBSON: I take your point about Lincoln’s words, but you went on and said, “There is a plan and it is God’s plan.”

Gibson took her point about Lincoln's words but we wouldn't know that by watching the interview since it was left on the cutting room floor. I urge everybody to see just how the unedited version of the first interview compared to what we saw on television  by checking out the full transcript. It is a fascinating look into media manipulation via skillful editing.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: 2008; abc; abcnews; bias; charliegibson; chucklestheclown; democrats; dncmediamachine; dnctv; elections; enemedia; gibson; gibsonpalin; inquisition; interrogation; interview; marklevin; mccainpalin; mediabias; mediagestapo; msm; obamedia; palin; propagandawingofdnc; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-313 next last
To: coffee260

PULL ABC's F'n LICENSE!


121 posted on 09/13/2008 6:38:01 AM PDT by rvoitier ("I'll see you at the debate, bitches!" ~~ Paris Hilton, '08 Campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palomonte
If you look at the edited remarks, I see more repetition of the unedited remarks as if there were talking points. I don't believe in editing the I don't think this changes much on the positions. Isn't it dangerous to assign motives to the interviewer because it diverts one from the appropriateness or validity of the question. Were the questions really that leading to assign nefarious intent to Mr. Gibson?
122 posted on 09/13/2008 6:38:01 AM PDT by drligme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: coffee260
It's one thing to skip quetsions ad/or answers to shorten it for broadcast. One could even justify skipping the beginnning or the end of a Q or A, so long as the context is maintained. But to remove the middle of an answer such as:

And I do believe, though, that this war against extreme Islamic terrorists is the right thing. It’s an unfortunate thing, because war is hell and I hate war, and, Charlie,

is a deliberate attempt to distort the interview. These people are disgusting.

123 posted on 09/13/2008 6:38:45 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tarawa

bump to read the transcript later.


124 posted on 09/13/2008 6:39:03 AM PDT by MissionMan (Africa - Bound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: coffee260
Photobucket

125 posted on 09/13/2008 6:40:57 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malesherbes
I e-mailed ABC news: I’ve lost all respect for Gibson. The interview was worse than condescending; it was dishonest.

I lost no respect for Gibson over this. He didn't have it from the start. Nor did Rather, Brokaw, Koppel, etc. in the last two elections, nor did Jennings and Russert when they were alive.

These a-holes just don't get that we are on to them. They don't realize that the people who "blog in pajamas" also vote, and that when they don't vote, their side has a better chance at winning (witness Carter, Clinton, and the 2006 midterm).

That's why I didn't put any stock in any part of the interview. All these bricks (rhymes with) in the media are going to do is drive the base that much closer to McCain and Palin, and then like good little lapdogs, they'll be wondering what happens when Uh-bama and SloJoe go down in flames on Election Day.

We should be angry at the expected treatment, but let's channel the anger to something productive - keep putting out the truth (as lies are their side's baseline), and convert our anger into turning out the base, and anyone else who is outraged by this.

126 posted on 09/13/2008 6:42:13 AM PDT by Christian4Bush (No way, No how, NObama! *************McCain/Palin 08************)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: coffee260

F*** that; why bother complaining to Gibson or ABC? Waste of time; this travesty needs to be on Drudge ASAP. Someone here has the connections to get this out there. McCain Palin should also post the entire transcript on their website.

What they should NOT do is play the victim game. Palin still came of remarkably well, despite the egregiously biased editing. Just the facts, ma’am; that’s all they need to put out...just the facts and no whining.


127 posted on 09/13/2008 6:42:49 AM PDT by Ilya Mourometz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

"PULL ABC's F'n LICENSE!"


128 posted on 09/13/2008 6:43:01 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: donnab

Drudge breaking news on Rather doing internal investigation thread
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1211645/posts


129 posted on 09/13/2008 6:44:03 AM PDT by Evil Slayer (Sarah Palin reminds me of the story about David and Goliath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: timestax

b t t t


130 posted on 09/13/2008 6:45:35 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

bump to archive graphic


131 posted on 09/13/2008 6:47:22 AM PDT by Christian4Bush (No way, No how, NObama! *************McCain/Palin 08************)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: coffee260

bttt


132 posted on 09/13/2008 6:47:45 AM PDT by petercooper (IQ tests for all voters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drligme

...were the questions really that leading to assign nefarious intent to Mr. Gibson?

how the hell do I know?

what I do know is that Gibson was clearly on a different mission with Palin than he was with Obama.


133 posted on 09/13/2008 6:54:37 AM PDT by palomonte (see the light or feel the heat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom; STARWISE; Fudd Fan

Great One ping!


134 posted on 09/13/2008 6:55:15 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: beyondashadow

Ping!


135 posted on 09/13/2008 6:58:11 AM PDT by whatexit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coffee260

Wow!! Charlie fell on a grenade to save Obama.


136 posted on 09/13/2008 6:58:24 AM PDT by syriacus (Calling humans "pigs" is second-nature for anti-war radicals, Black Panthers + radical Islamists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coffee260

I urge you to send Charles Gibson your thoughts.

DONE!


137 posted on 09/13/2008 7:01:14 AM PDT by two-edged-sword (Guns, God, Lipstick... Yeah baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I suggest everybody copy and paste this and sent to:

1. your entire email distribution list

2. Large national newspapers.

3. Drudge

4. **All major networks and cable news outlets...let them know about this story....they love to tear each other apart as much as conservatives.

“This aggression will not stand....man”...The Big Lebowski


138 posted on 09/13/2008 7:02:30 AM PDT by rbmillerjr (Message to radical jihadis. "...step in my hood, it's understood ------ it's open season" Stuck Mojo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: coffee260

Gibson is just one more loathsome press POS who will tell any lie to get Obama elected. This is a surprise?


139 posted on 09/13/2008 7:02:41 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coffee260

I think ABC also edited out Sarah’s last remark to Charlie:

“You are a Democrat tool, right Charlie?”


140 posted on 09/13/2008 7:02:56 AM PDT by reaganixonbush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-313 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson