Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The will of the people has no affect on California legislators.
1 posted on 09/11/2008 6:31:17 PM PDT by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: nobama08

I’m sure Awwnold will stand against it. He plans to run his Hummer on unicorn farts.


2 posted on 09/11/2008 6:33:57 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Eras will now be referred to as: BS: Before Sarah and AS: After Sarah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08

Precisely. This is an EXCELLENT opportunity for some conservatives to peel off some independent voters from the DemocRAT camp. RINOs OTOH need not apply.


3 posted on 09/11/2008 6:34:27 PM PDT by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08
California Assembly has taken a firm stand against the drilling The people of America. Please take note of it.
4 posted on 09/11/2008 6:34:45 PM PDT by xcamel (Conservatives start smart, and get rich, liberals start rich, and get stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08

Good we will put a California tax on our Florida oil.


5 posted on 09/11/2008 6:35:13 PM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08

McClintock may have come out with a drill now comment, but I sure can’t think of anyone else who might have in California (on the record).

Conservative intent in California might just as well be a national security issue, since it would hardly see the light of day.


6 posted on 09/11/2008 6:38:02 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (McCain, the Ipecac President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08

If they would take the Governor, maybe we could sell California to Mexico?


7 posted on 09/11/2008 6:38:19 PM PDT by Tarpon (Three things matter when selecting a President - character, character and character.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08

Fine, California gets to pay$3.00 more per gallon than the national average.....its called the cost of being wrong surtax.


8 posted on 09/11/2008 6:39:53 PM PDT by Nekman (Liberals: Beliefs built on nothing but Lies.....no wonder they all take Prozac!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08

I am becoming more and more ashamed to tell anyone that I am from a state that’s run by DIMWITTS!!!! Not sure it will ever change either!!!


9 posted on 09/11/2008 6:40:06 PM PDT by SoldiersPrayingMom (....A nation divided against itself, cannot stand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08

Good ! let the mental midgets in the Californian assembly tell the people they will be purchsing oil from Chavez and they will be paying 7 or 8 dollars a gallon. Lets see how long they stay in office.


10 posted on 09/11/2008 6:41:49 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (IF YOU ARE NOT CONSERVATIVE BY 35 YOU HAVE NO BRAIN. W CHURCHILL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08

The Cali legislature can be thrown out on their collective butts, by “the will of the people”!
All they need is opposition candidates to campain on “Drill here, Drill now!”


11 posted on 09/11/2008 6:42:16 PM PDT by G Larry (Our VP has more executive experience than B.O.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08
California Says No Yes To Offshore Oil Drilling Walking
13 posted on 09/11/2008 6:44:16 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08

Beyond some number of miles (and certainly no more that 50, if that), states should have no say whatsoever in whether or not offshore drilling is allowed. Maybe when they start funding and furnishing their own Coast Guard and Navy, they might should have more say.

But, this shows once again how weak McCain’s position on drilling is: new offshore drilling only IF the states agree. And, of course, he still opposes drilling in ANWR. Anyone thinking his present position will result in a significant increase in domestic crude production needs to look more closely.


14 posted on 09/11/2008 6:45:58 PM PDT by Will88 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08

From “Three Days of the Condor” (1975)

Higgins: It’s simple economics. Today it’s oil, right? In ten or fifteen years, food. Plutonium. Maybe even sooner. Now, what do you think the people are gonna want us to do then?

Joe Turner: Ask them?

Higgins: Not now - then! Ask ‘em when they’re running out. Ask ‘em when there’s no heat in their homes and they’re cold. Ask ‘em when their engines stop. Ask ‘em when people who have never known hunger start going hungry. You wanna know something? They won’t want us to ask ‘em. They’ll just want us to get it for ‘em!


17 posted on 09/11/2008 6:48:52 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (Mavericuda in '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08
I'm curious. Does it matter about California? What about the oil shale and oil sands? What about ANWR? What about that big field in the Gulf? What about off the Atlantic coast? What about those formerly dry wells in TX, OK, PA that were dry that have now been found to be refilling? What about that guy in Indiana that has a well in his back yard pumping crude and he and neighbors plan on drilling more? What about the Great Lakes? What about Chesepeak Bay? There is probably a lot more places I have not even heard about. With the new safe drilling techniques, I have no fear of environmental damage, but I've read that in some cases the underwater sea life or on land wildlife thrive.

Something we really need is several brand new high-tech refineries to refine all our new crude or the coal, oil shale and oil sands.

18 posted on 09/11/2008 6:50:29 PM PDT by KriegerGeist (Lifetime member of the "Christian-Radical-Right-Wing-Conspirators")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08
I honestly believe that the oil refineries should ration gasoline to California... to the extent that California refineries fall short of the amount used daily by Calidiots...

What could be fairer than that?

Let the fruits and nuts run their gaymobiles on windmills and solar power...

21 posted on 09/11/2008 6:51:37 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Change is not a plan; Hope is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08

If we had a governor with some Palin-sized cojones we could be drilling right now, and sending rebate checks to every taxpayer in the state.

But we don’t and we won’t. That’s what you get for re-electing the same socialist grafters to the legislature time after time, Californios.


24 posted on 09/11/2008 6:55:13 PM PDT by Argus (Obama: All turban and no goats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08
Drill Nancy's head.

I know it's not oil, but maybe we could make a methane processor like in that Mel G movie Thunderdome.

25 posted on 09/11/2008 6:56:55 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (I will stand with the Muslims ~B Hussein Obomunist ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Verito Possumus~Verified Sleeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08

This is why I advocate taking the power to regulate oil drilling more than 25 miles away from the states. You cannot allow our national security to be destroyed by a bunch of +60 year old 60’s hippies who think that a tree has more rights than an unborn child.


27 posted on 09/11/2008 7:26:08 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08

Okay. Fair enough. No oil from new offshore wells to be provided to California refineries. Any products shipped to California will have a 60% excise tax applied to reduce the national debt.


30 posted on 09/11/2008 7:40:00 PM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Sarah Palin...Unleashing the Fury of the Castrated Left!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08

“The California Assembly has taken a firm stand against the drilling, saying that the move would protect the state’s beaches.”

Total idiots that have no knowledge of history in California.

If the current off shore wells hadn’t been drilled there wouldn’t be a beach in southern California that you could go on without getting covered with tar.


33 posted on 09/11/2008 7:55:51 PM PDT by dalereed (both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson