To: acsrp38
It gets better. According to Yoder, parents have a fundamental right to parent their children. Also, the Supreme Court has decided that a frozen embroyo is property of both parents; and both parents have a 50% interest in that property (thereby making it impossible for one to destroy it without the permission of the other). I asked in my Con. Law class, when we reviewed the Roe v. Wade case how the Court justified depriving the father of his fundamental right to parent his child, as well as his property right? Talk about stirring up a hornet's nest. Sheesh. I got called a woman hater, was told that I wanted women chained to the stove and to be sexual slaves, etc. etc. I never did get an answer to my questions from the pro-aborts in my class. My professor thought it was funny a woman student was addressing the issue from that point of view, though. I think I got a "sympathy" A for that one day alone. *LOL*
To: IMissPresidentReagan
As does Justice Scalia, you delight in spreading ben gay on the open wounds created by Roe.
211 posted on
09/11/2008 10:49:39 AM PDT by
sono
(Pontius Pilate Voted "Present!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson