Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ad on sex education distorts Obama policy (Perverted Obama wants sex education for 5 year olds)
MSNBC ^ | 9/10/2008 | LARRY ROHTER/NY Times

Posted on 09/11/2008 5:05:48 AM PDT by tobyhill

DAYTON, Ohio - Escalating its efforts to portray Senator Barack Obama as a candidate whose values fall outside the mainstream, the campaign of Senator John McCain on Tuesday unveiled a new television advertisement claiming that Mr. Obama, the Democratic nominee, favors “comprehensive sex education” for kindergarten students.

“Learning about sex before learning to read?” the narrator asks in the 30-second advertisement, which the campaign says will be shown in battleground states and on national cable. The commercial also asserts that a sex-education bill introduced in Illinois, which Mr. Obama did not sponsor and which never became law, is his “one accomplishment” in the field of education.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: culturewar; doasthouwill; education; electionads; homosexualagenda; indoctrination; littleredschoolhouse; mccainpalin; obamabiden; politicalcorrectness; sexpositiveagenda; sexualizingchildren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 09/11/2008 5:05:48 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Sorry, this ad stinks of desperation. McCain needs to focus on real issues that might actually affect us. There are plenty of them. Instead, he’s going the liberal route of campaigning.


2 posted on 09/11/2008 5:09:36 AM PDT by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
which Mr. Obama did not sponsor

He didn't sponsor anything, but I bet he voted for it.

3 posted on 09/11/2008 5:10:27 AM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad

I think the bill number was 0099.


4 posted on 09/11/2008 5:11:44 AM PDT by PeteB570 (NRA - Life member and Black Rifle owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad
The only desperation is that of MSNBC.

They don't want the truth about Obama's views to come out.

There was a clip of Obama discussing this bill yesterday, on KTLK-FM 100.3 in Minneapolis of all places.

I think it was Sean Hannity who played it.

Obama ended with words to the effect of "Nevertheless, it's the right thing to do" [in favor of the bill].

Cheers!

5 posted on 09/11/2008 5:12:51 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brett66

Thought Hannity said he co-authored the Bill.


6 posted on 09/11/2008 5:14:44 AM PDT by Gemsbok (Drill here, Drill now, & Pay Less!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad
It's true. The MSM is trying to distort the bill that came out of committee that Obama supported. The bill called for sex-education for 5 year olds. It called for teachers to discuss masturbation, parts that feel good when touched and one paragraph that spoke about touching that's wrong and doesn't feel good.
7 posted on 09/11/2008 5:15:03 AM PDT by tobyhill (fraud -noun;(1)deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, (2) Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
He voted for it in committee but the Illinois Congress got a backlash by parents then tabled it. It was what it was and Obama agreed to it.
The teaching of sex-ed for 5 year olds is nothing new to ultra-libs.
8 posted on 09/11/2008 5:18:56 AM PDT by tobyhill (fraud -noun;(1)deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, (2) Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

No, it doesn’t. Rush read the actual bill on the air. He has a copy of the bill where 6 (for sixth grade) was stricken out and K (for Kindergarten) was added. Obama voted for the bill. Now, that’s normally not a huge deal, except it was one of the few bills Obama voted something other than “present” on.

Case closed. I fine the NYT another 10,000 lost subscribers for their blatant pro-Obama bias.


9 posted on 09/11/2008 5:20:09 AM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Can someone post the section from the bill that is controversial? We need the facts.


10 posted on 09/11/2008 5:20:32 AM PDT by Blacksheep (The Greens will put us all in the RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
More background info, including link to and quotes from the bill, can this can be found in this FR thread: Obama Targeted on 'Sex Ed for Kindergarteners'
11 posted on 09/11/2008 5:21:30 AM PDT by AHerald ("Be faithful to God ... do not bother about the ridicule of the foolish." - St. Pio of Pietrelcina)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
He didn't sponsor anything, but I bet he voted for it.

The ad is true. Obama does not deny voting for the bill in committee, and does not deny the language of the bill says what the ad claims. The only defense he's offered is that he did not understand the bill when he voted for it. He claims he voted for it for the reasons stated in the article. Unfortunately, the article does not bother to show the actual language of the bill. As usual, the media give him a pass. I guess it's okay to vote for bad legislation as long as you didn't really mean to , or didn't actually read it - at least that seems to be his excuse. What matters is your intent.

12 posted on 09/11/2008 5:21:37 AM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad

I have a feeling this is another case where Obama is obfuscating the truth, like his BAIPA (Live birth abortion record. The McCain campaign wouldnt spend money making an ad where there are other wedge issues on the table that can be used.

Hannity said 5 year olds would be taught that it is ok to masturbate, going to a secluded place to masturbate, homosexuality is ok.


13 posted on 09/11/2008 5:25:32 AM PDT by igoramus08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad

“Sorry, this ad stinks of desperation”

The ad is true.

If you dont like, make sure you tell obi when you go to his next rally to not vote for crap like that.


14 posted on 09/11/2008 5:26:32 AM PDT by VanDeKoik (Sarah Palin in 2008, 2012, and 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blacksheep
***”Each class or course in comprehensive sex education offered in any of grades K 6 through 12 shall include instruction on the prevention of sexually transmitted infections, including the prevention, transmission and spread of HIV.”***

They need not talk about prevention of STDs to 5 year olds unless they planned on talking about sex. There's other parts of the bill that talked about private masturbation.

15 posted on 09/11/2008 5:35:45 AM PDT by tobyhill (fraud -noun;(1)deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, (2) Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

What is “distorted” about this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJ6vZRy62KY


16 posted on 09/11/2008 5:47:18 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Now you know why the needles on compasses point north - Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

People need to keep a compilation of Obama vidoes on hand for those who may be undecided....here is a start:

Obama Speech - Teleprompter Goes Out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDJSVPAx8xc

How many?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws&feature=related

Is he serious?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTSa5FS4oxY&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNzmly28Bmg

What is “distorted” about this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJ6vZRy62KY


17 posted on 09/11/2008 5:49:13 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Now you know why the needles on compasses point north - Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
Nothing is distorted except MSNBC and the Slimes who want it distorted to shill for Obama.
18 posted on 09/11/2008 5:51:19 AM PDT by tobyhill (fraud -noun;(1)deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, (2) Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad

Sexual indoctrination of 5-year-olds by the nanny state isn’t a ‘real issue’? Have you read this bill? The ad isn’t a distortion in the least bit. Nor does it ‘stink’ of anything but Obama’s leftist/communist agenda.


19 posted on 09/11/2008 5:52:42 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (Palin 2008 (oh yeah, and McCain too))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

This ad is to gin the base. It is not for the nass of casual short attention span voters.


20 posted on 09/11/2008 5:54:43 AM PDT by steve8714 (Sarah was picked for the base. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson