Posted on 09/07/2008 4:14:17 PM PDT by jern
Drudge: NY Times Prepares To Front Expose on Palin's Baby...Developing...
true, I forgot about that... it’s always Sunday afternoon for these Drudge “tickles”...
Which baby are we talking about Trig? or Baby Johnston?
The MSM would float this idea to force a paternity test.
If this is their tactic it looks like they don't have much.
Or, maybe Drudge just doesn't have much and he needs something to pump up interest in tonight's show.
Her water didn’t break, it was leaking. If your water breaks, don’t fool around, get to the hospital. My water broke at home with my first child, and my daughter was born about 45 minutes later - 10 minutes after we got there.
With the annenberg stuff coming and his interview with O’Reilly, they need a big explosion to cover. I just America finally sees who benefits from the national food fight we call politics.
How does a newspaper expose a baby? A nude photograph?
Wierd.
How dare you compare the NYT to the Weekly World News! You are insulting the good people at the WWN.
what exactly does this mean??? They are going to bring the BABY into this????????????????????????
The National Enquirer wouldn't lower their journaistic standards that much. Nor would they invest good money in a sinking ship.
Didn’t Alan Colms say because she was flying at 36 weeks Palin caused the Downs?
Maybe the NYT will say she caused the Downs by smacking (probably just patting) her belly.
And he won the US Senate seat after a friendly judge unsealed the (R) candidate’s messy divorce records causing him to withdraw and forcing the GOP to make a last minute substitute.
I hope it’s nothing like this. I found this comment in the thread of a YouTube video called “Sarah Palin Speech Highlights” which is actually a video produced and posted on McCain’s own YouTube channel. Democrats have been flooding and attacking Palin all weekend in this thread.
One poster called “Barack0bamaO8” wrote:
Barack0bamaO8 (23 hours ago)
“I agree with you Mitch87. But the big word in the sentence is “IF”. Hopefully it is. Until then I think the news should focus on the pitiful child that never should have been brought to term. Down-syndrome children have to go through a life of hell. This alone shows that this woman is unable to make the right decisions in life let alone for our nation. They should keep the cameras on the kid’s face everywhere she takes him. Atleast until we can confirm this rumor.”
The video, the thread and the posting are found here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Om2gNE48gDI
“Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.”
The gods must not like the NY Times.
Hmmmm. The slime angle on that story has been over-worked a hundred times already, with a very measurable backlash. The only front-page expose’ they could really do on that story now would be an expose’ on how the smear originated from, and was orchestrated by, the Obama machine (I’ll stop dreaming now, I know they’d never give them up for it).
“I think the NYT, must have found out that Trig is gay! ;)”
I can’t stop laughing!
Breaking News: Trig Palin is only pretending to be a Down’s baby.
(Heh.)
The only thing that could hurt, I think, is if they really are somehow one and the same. That would be problematic only because of the claims to the contrary.
Well, if you change a baby's diaper, you SUPPOSED to expose the front!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.