Posted on 09/06/2008 3:56:05 AM PDT by dascallie
For those that don't know the preface to all of this, Larry Sinclair is the guy that insists ( with cell phone numbers and names) that he shared crack cocaine with Obama (which Obama bought in a matter of a single phone call in Sinclair's presence) and sexual activities in 1999.
The story gets even more serious after someone Sinclair had never met or knew about--Donald Young--- the openly gay choir director at Trinity United ( Rev Wright's church) contacted Sinclair and told him not to expose the information--while Young also dropped that he and Obama had been intimate as well. This was fall 2007.
Sinclair stated he only was going to go public about the crack information, no sexual details.
Apparently Young pressured Sinclair further about withholding all information ( all via phone).
Two months later--December 2008--Young was found murdered at his Chicago apt...to date, still unsolved with no suspects.
Sinclair went public with his story first in Feb 2008 with a youtube video, eventually presenting a formal presentation at The National Press Club on June 18 2008.
Sinclair presented findings of a 3rd party polygraph which he passed. In the meantime, incessant misinformation about this polygraph being failed has been continously promulgated across the internet.
The arrest warrant from Delaware came immediately after the press conference without any evidence of crime or explanation. Police apprehended Sinclair. Joe Biden's son is Atty General of Delaware.
Sinclair has led a checkered lowlife existance which makes it easier for him to be discredited. However, he has refused all financial reward and asks only that his story be objectively investigated. One gets the idea that he feels keeping it all in the "light" as much as possible is his best life insurance policy.
He has received continuous death threats...he has been the subject of trumped rumors that he suffers from brain cancer ( untrue)--a fabricated storyline just "in case" something happens to him perhaps?
I am sending this link to every “news” outlet. Maybe they will cover this when they cover Obama’s birth certificate story. We will see
You may want to make a note of this date, it has not happened yet............................Two months later—December 2008—Young was found murdered
Obama is a bisexual communist.
Good catch. December 2007.
Pffff.
Why would Barack Obama want to have gay sex with Larry Sinclair when he has David Axelrod?
It’s only September 2008 right now.
Yes, typo. Young was murdered in December 2007
http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/2008/05/15/investigative-report-murder-involving-trinity-church/
This has as much credibility as the Sarah Palin fake pregnancy rumours. And the fake book banning rumours.
This is gossip with no proof. Just someone who wants to smear Obama.
I say lets stick to the real stuff. It gets lumped into stories like this, so that his real scary affiliations do not get looked at. Please drop this nonsense.
Donald Young ‘s murder is real stuff.
Watch the video below. Then you can get back to your smokescreen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1IS_WHBjQA
Sinclair ping
Any proof that the daughters are actually his? Maybe Michelle used a sperm donor.
Not so sure it is nonsense. Obama is a Clinton wannabe, Chicago is way more corrupt than Arkansas, and, I think he is capable of being involved. There is much more involved here than just Obama himself, the whole democrat party is fighting for their life here. This election is a must win for them and at all cost for them to survive. Things are changing and the Dems don’t like it.
And it risks overall credibility for all of us.
So there better be viable evidence to sustain the charges.
Or this thread needs to be removed immediately.
This is one of the reasons no one takes them seriously.
Then again, this stuff is more believable for any given democrat.
Good luck with your research.
It is underbelly stuff no doubt. Fringe-sounding. And that is what the Obama orgs are hoping will keep it off the radar.
They want people to say exactly what YOU are saying —and keep saying it...”We are better than this crap...we don’t want to be associated with it...if there is no bullet proof evidence RIGHT NOW—remove it”..
What a brilliant strategy...to have the opposition do your psychological offense for you!
No, my friend, there is volumes of information, just do your own DD.
The same could be said about what we knew of the Clintons before they were elected. It was only after the election many things came to light. My own personal onservation is that Michelle Obama is probably as ruthlesss as Hillary is, maybe even more so if she was in a position of power, like say, first lady? Obama already stated he values her opinion over others.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.