Also, Dick Morris when pressed, told Sean Hannity this afternoon that he expects Obama to win by 1 - 2 percentage points. Morris is probably betting that this will happen because of the fact that there has been a population shift, but no Census and subsequent Congressional redistricting that means that the Republicans we expected to be in Ohio have gone west and since they will overwhelming elect McCain in western and southern red states those states won't have the electoral votes that they will have after the 2010 census and we will loose with the slimmest of margins. This may very well be determined be a case where Obama has a majority in the electoral college but a minority on the popular vote count. Just like Bush - Gore in 2000. So we have to hope to hold Ohio and quite possibly roll Colorado. It would be nice to have Pennsylvania, but there are just too many Dems there to overcome.
Obama will move on ammo if given the chance.
He didn’t specify though that he might try to take them away.
I cannot wait until he gets hammered on this. Bwahahahahahaha!
Owussy won’t go to your home to take your guns away. It’s not his style. He’ll send someone else to do it.
"I did not have sec with that woman!"
"The check is in the mail."
That’s so nice of him.
Pure BULLSH!T...plain and simple. If you tell a lie often enough, some fools will begin to believe it!!!
He doesn’t have to take them away. He just has to get Congress to slap a tax of $1000 on each box of ammunition. That will effectively kill the 2nd Amendment.
And don’t think for a minute that he wouldn’t try this if he thought it had a chance of success.
I’d like to see him try ....
I wonder if Obama formulated his 2nd Amendment strategy during his days as a “community organizer”.
The guy is a down-the-line leftist. Nullification of the Second Amendment is a standard leftist policy from which they have never backed down. Once in office with a rat majority in the House and a filibuster-proof majority in the senate this guy will reduce the Second Amendment to a fond memory - or start a rebellion trying.
Why wouldn't these government paid Communist go after the gangsters instead of the guns?
We know where 99 percent of all these cockroaches live. We have cataloged their tattoos, we know where they hang out, who their accomplices are, who their girlfriends are, where their families live, we have their criminal records, their photographs, work histories, we have most these roaches DNA, fingerprints etc. We jail them routinely, then these government hacks routinely release them back to prey on the rest of us.
Who they kidding?
Damn Right you’re not Obama!
Not if you don’t whant a civil war on your hands!
This year’s Democratic ticket is likely the most anti-gun pair that has ever run- besting even Clinton/Gore and Kerry/Edwards. Obama’s record is well documented at www.nraila.org/obama - including his votes to ban most all rifle ammunition commonly used by hunters and sportsmen and supporting a proposal that would close almost all gun shops in the country. Biden is just as bad.
Senator Biden has a long anti-gun record. Beginning in the late 1980s, he voted against the NRA position on most issues. He received an “F” rating from the NRA in 2002.
Sen. Biden was the lead sponsor of the Senate crime bill in the 103rd Congress (S. 1607), to which the Clinton Gun Ban amendment was attached. (The crime bill that eventually passed was the House version, but it still included the gun ban.)
Biden voted for the ban on a stand-alone vote in 1993 ( Feinstein amendment, vote no. 375, 11/17/93) and voted to extend the ban in 2004 as an amendment to the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (vote no. 24, 3/2/2004), and included a renewal of the ban in his crime bill last year along with gun show restrictions (S. 2237, title VI).
In the 101st Congress, 1990, Biden introduced two crime bills, S. 1970 and S. 1972. S. 1970 proposed banning the AR-15 and similar semi-automatic firearms, and provided that the Treasury Secretary and Attorney General could recommend to Congress any other firearms (regardless of type) to be designated as “additional assault weapons.”S. 1972 proposed banning the purchase of the same guns unless the seller and buyer fill out and maintain copies of a 4473 or equivalent document, essentially just requiring private sellers to maintain records.
Biden reiterated his support for the ban (in fact, took credit for authoring it) in response to a question at the the CNN/YouTube debate this year (referenced in Saturday’s post). He also campaigned on the issue, and used the other side’s usual talking points in his campaign ads and letters to constituents in the ’90s. Even before the Feinstein amendment, Biden introduced crime bills that contained semi-auto bans (see bottom).
Hat tip to my friends over at the Yahoo Gun Issues group.
Well I be damned! You finally got one right Bozo!
You definitely are NOT taking my guns away!
Tradition of gun ownership!?
How about that 2nd Amendment to the Constitution.
Didn’t he teach Constitutional law? Or was that Liberal Constitutional Law?
"Instead, I'll send my jack-booted government thugs to take them away. When you are visited by them, be sure to open the door promptly, and don't talk back to them."