Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN John Roberts asks Senator Biden about his lobbyist Son!

Posted on 09/04/2008 4:54:18 AM PDT by HD1200

McCain's tough talk with CNN over a Larry King Interview and Campbell Brown's out of line questioning of Palin experience is paying dividends. Today about 6:25 CST John Roberts interjected two questions about Senator Biden's millionaire lobbyist son. The Senator was visibly phased at the first question about it and after the second question as to whether it was proper for him to meet with companies that his son lobby's for, he filibustered the time left on the interview with Biden rhetoric on other subjects! Keep pounding the media McCain/Palin!


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: biden; corruption
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 09/04/2008 4:54:20 AM PDT by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HD1200

I wonder if he could have been fazed as well as phased.
“;^)


2 posted on 09/04/2008 4:55:50 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

Ten minutes later Biden was on Fox with Brian Kilmead and I believe he was still flustered by the John Roberts questioning of his son’s lobbying activities!


3 posted on 09/04/2008 4:55:53 AM PDT by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

“Ten minutes later Biden was on Fox with Brian Kilmead and I believe he was still flustered by the John Roberts questioning of his son’s lobbying activities!”

Is he pregnant? Or is he a crook? Ah, he’s just a crook. Nothing to see hear, move on.


4 posted on 09/04/2008 4:58:25 AM PDT by mmanager (What a mess we are in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
I agree...I thought Joe looked like he agita big time! His face was in shock. And Joe denied to Brian that he and Barry were planning an investigation on Bush. Brian slipped in at the end that the reports were in two British papers.
5 posted on 09/04/2008 4:59:37 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes
I wonder if he could have been fazed as well as phased.

... or phasered!

6 posted on 09/04/2008 5:01:28 AM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

http://www.americasright.com/2008/09/berg-v-obama-update-wednesday-september.html

Barry might be busy for a while.


7 posted on 09/04/2008 5:03:15 AM PDT by Salamander (Obama hates uppity women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi
... he agita big time.

Is "he agita" an allusion to a certain episode of "The Honeymooners?"

8 posted on 09/04/2008 5:06:06 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Without the second, the rest are just politicians' BS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

“he HAD agita”... ;)


9 posted on 09/04/2008 5:08:57 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HD1200
...he filibustered...

That is his only talent.

10 posted on 09/04/2008 5:11:22 AM PDT by TankerKC (Those are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Good news! But I thought the lawsuit was dismissed?


11 posted on 09/04/2008 5:11:51 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

Well, today is Thursday so I reckon we’ll find out....:)


12 posted on 09/04/2008 5:13:54 AM PDT by Salamander (Obama hates uppity women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mmanager

He’s also a liar. A post the other day had him gushing over the Pittsburgh Steelers and the football his sons were given after his first wife’s death. Apparently, he never told his second wife about his undying devotion to the Steelers.

http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/hofmann/Joe_Biden_Birds_fan.html


13 posted on 09/04/2008 5:14:56 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey

Manny Ortiz is his favorite Red Sox player too.


14 posted on 09/04/2008 5:23:15 AM PDT by TankerKC (Those are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

The motion for a temporary restraining order was denied because Obambi/DNC had not been served, but the actual case was not thrown out...Berg has confirmed that the FEC has already been served and the DNC will be served by the end of the day.


15 posted on 09/04/2008 5:24:21 AM PDT by Barry Soetoro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Barry Soetoro

Groovy! Thanks.


16 posted on 09/04/2008 5:25:26 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

Now that their done lynching a 17 yr old pregnant girl maybe they can ask why Michelle was paid an extra $200K starting the day Barak was sworne in as senator??

Pray for W Mav/Cuda and Our Troops


17 posted on 09/04/2008 5:28:11 AM PDT by bray (Drill Congress!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC

>>Manny Ortiz is his favorite Red Sox player too.

He better bone up on hockey because he’s going to be forechecked, backchecked and left wing locked.

For the unitiated, forechecking is when the forwards attack opponents in the offensive zone(opponent’s defensive zone). Backchecking is the forwards coming back to help the defensemen in the defensive zone Z(opponent’s offensive zone). Left wing lock is a Detroit Red Wings style of play - in the neutral zone, where the left wing acts as a third defenseman, creating a 2 on 1 situation on any opposing forward to lock them out of their offensive zone.


18 posted on 09/04/2008 5:32:51 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

I thought that was AHUMMINAHUMMINA.


19 posted on 09/04/2008 5:40:22 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HD1200

Plugs: Don’t faze me, bro!


20 posted on 09/04/2008 5:43:07 AM PDT by hsrazorback1 (To get what you had, do what you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson