Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

left increases it's attack on the fammily of Sarah Palin
Low Life leftwing site ^

Posted on 09/01/2008 10:02:47 PM PDT by Tempest

Well I was browsing the cess pool that is DU to see what level of mental derangement the left had managed to achieve today. And low and behold their latest attack.

http://www.stupidsheeple.com/index.php/2008090140/latest/bristol-palin-gone-wild.html

A-holes.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: apostropheabuse; election; palin; palinfamily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-149 next last
To: Stentor
They make me sick, CNN was bragging that all their buddies on the blogs gossiping about the mother covering for the daughter by faking a pregnancy......so the reporter said she was SENT to “investigate” that blog story.

Good grief, they wouldn't do that for us in a million years.

81 posted on 09/01/2008 11:26:35 PM PDT by roses of sharon ((Who sent Barack Hussein Obama?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: JayCTN
Lieberman?
82 posted on 09/01/2008 11:28:31 PM PDT by singfreedom (Obama's solution to the energy crisis: check the air in your tires! Why didn't we think of that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: aquila48
This was NOT Bristol. See the update. Just more frantic dirt-digging by the left.

As for the New York Times article you linked to (hint:The New York Times?), See this link.

AND GET A GRIP!

83 posted on 09/01/2008 11:28:50 PM PDT by iowamomforfreedom (Drill Here! Drill Now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JayCTN
As for the pictures... we reported what we were given... they looked like Bristol to us... but we write what we feel.

It's called fact checking. Look up due diligence and see how it pertains to libel. Pictures I got from some guy "looked authentic" therefore we "felt" fine about publishing.

C'mon, that has nothing to do with being politically incorrect, it has everything to do with causing deliberate harm in a reckless and demonstrably false manner.

84 posted on 09/01/2008 11:28:50 PM PDT by Mensius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: JayCTN

Thank you for the reply. I’ve now been able to identify some of the pictures you show from other places, but can’t determine who had what, first, and frankly, no one seems to be able to actually claim this girl is Sarah.

As I now look at your own blog, you’ve now corrected yourself with an update (Update 4) saying the girl isn’t Sarah, but her “soon-to-be sister-in-law.”

Thanks for the correction there.


85 posted on 09/01/2008 11:29:55 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
So, I would Imagine that the MSM would have ran with the John Edwards story if he had a press release stating that he had been cheating on his cancer stricken wife.

Sophistry.

86 posted on 09/01/2008 11:30:38 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

http://www.dailykos.com/

Are you lost?


87 posted on 09/01/2008 11:30:44 PM PDT by roses of sharon ((Who sent Barack Hussein Obama?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: JayCTN
I wonder if you realize what will happen if “you get what you want”, in getting Mccain to dump Sara—for Lieberman or Romney.

The Christian base WILL see it as a “slap in the face” and STAY HOME.

The PUMA’s,and DemMCCRATS who are as mad as hornets now over Sarah's treatment, will most likely not vote either, or vote for O.

In short—O will WIN..Is THAT what you want??

88 posted on 09/01/2008 11:33:15 PM PDT by Rca2000 ( The things Obama says is making Jimmy Carter look like George Washington today!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: South40
NoodleyAppendage (1000+ posts) Sat Aug-30-08 10:26 122. What many here don't understand. It doesn't matter if it's true or not. RUMOR IS TRUTH. The modern laws of media hype and political warfare have a useful tenet: Repeat ANYTHING or raise false concern over ANYTHING and it is likely to be planted in the conscious/subconscious of many voters.

If people start to think that there might be something fishy with Palin's last kid (if hers), then that's FINE. One more doubt (whether tied to reality or not) is another hesitation at the ballot box.

GET WITH THE PROGRAM PEOPLE. The "rising above it" bullshit has served us so well in the past, hasn't it?

If you have problems with the story, then STFU and get out of the way of Dems who are engaged in MODERN POLITICAL WARFARE. Go tend your garden or some other pedestrian task, because the "concern trolls" are not helping shape the message.

Looks to me like is screen name is apt. Anyone who would deliberately engage in this sort of vileness *must* be a spaghetti d***k...

the infowarrior

89 posted on 09/01/2008 11:34:26 PM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Looking at the website the photos aren’t even of bristol they are of her boyfriends sister. Which makes this posting libelous as well as in bad taste. Though in all fairness the poster has no added an update indicating that he too is starting to realize that the photos are not of bristol but instead of her prospective sister in law.


90 posted on 09/01/2008 11:35:11 PM PDT by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Stentor

The MSM laid off the Palin Pregnancy story until there was a press release. But, yes the campaign had little choice since the issue would have been very obvious very soon.

Should the media ignored the press release and not ran with the story?


91 posted on 09/01/2008 11:36:58 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

“I think you are quitting.”

You think wrong... I just couldn’t continue supporting someone if he is lying to us.

I hope he holds a news conference soon and clears the air or this is going to unravel in a hurry.


92 posted on 09/01/2008 11:38:18 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000; JayCTN
In short—O will WIN..Is THAT what you want??

That's exactly what he wants. He's a troll who just signed up today and for whatever motive is trashing Palin with false pictures of their daughter.

93 posted on 09/01/2008 11:40:02 PM PDT by CedarDave (Unlike Obama in the IL & US senate, Sarah Palin could not vote "present" on local council issues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

http://www.democraticunderground.com/

Still lost?.....let me help!


94 posted on 09/01/2008 11:41:12 PM PDT by roses of sharon ((Who sent Barack Hussein Obama?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

Don’t give into their lies and slander. If you research any of their claims there is usually little or nothing of substance to it. The website you linked to is fiercely partisan and has had it in for Sarah Palin and social conservatives from the beginning.


95 posted on 09/01/2008 11:42:10 PM PDT by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: aquila48
Do you remember how you felt after her speech? Proud, excited, principled, a shoo in this november... How do you feel now?

The same.  McCain/Palin 08

96 posted on 09/01/2008 11:43:43 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Rather than “Sarah,” I meant, obviously, Bristol.


97 posted on 09/01/2008 11:45:26 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: JayCTN

That is, “Bristol,” not “Sarah,” as I mistakenly stated in my earlier post.


98 posted on 09/01/2008 11:46:28 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: dschapin
Though in all fairness the poster has no added an update indicating that he too is starting to realize that the photos are not of bristol but instead of her prospective sister in law.

Your wasting your fairness on someone who thinks we're all stupid. A coward who must have his own excrement in his eyes if he ever thought those two girls looked anything alike.

99 posted on 09/01/2008 11:46:50 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

I don’t believe so. One of their sons is in a huge ethics scandal and is in trouble with the law and that is hardly being reported at all. Plus I don’t really think that it would be reported if Biden had young kids and one of his daughters got pregnant. Remember how much they covered for Clinton and he was the candidate.


100 posted on 09/01/2008 11:47:00 PM PDT by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson