Skip to comments.
Sure the Trig Palin smear is nasty...but...
Ghost of Freerepublic's Past ^
| 9/1/2008
| FR
Posted on 09/01/2008 8:26:27 AM PDT by sam_paine
How many times have we seen this photo on FR?
How many times have we propagated the Huma/Hillary lesbian rumor mill with a wink and a nod and a [POST]?
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: chelsea; clinton; hubbell; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 241-256 next last
To: Question_Assumptions
Oh, gosh...I hope you weren't horribly offended or made to "wince" for too long. There should absolutely be sensitivity warnings posted whenever anything sarcastic or snarky appears. Lord knows we don't want people swooning onto their keyboards or feeling uncomfortable. You seem so fragile I hope you'll be okay during this stressful political season.
Of course, for some perspective you could always compare how the deaths of say, Tony Snow or Barbara Olsen were treated on DU or Daily Kos and the deaths of liberals here.
101
posted on
09/01/2008 8:59:21 AM PDT
by
Deb
(Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
To: sam_paine
Wow, there really is quite a resemblance. I never noticed that before. Thanks for posting the compelling photographic evidence.
102
posted on
09/01/2008 8:59:22 AM PDT
by
Cedric
To: sam_paine
Personally this is the first time I'm seeing that picture and from the link, I see a lot of removed post unlike KOS or DU where they leave ugly rumors up for weeks on end and far beyond when credible evidence to the contrary is produced.
103
posted on
09/01/2008 9:00:19 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(fraud -noun;(1)deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, (2) Obama)
To: TomServo; sam_paine
I guess spelling Hubbell’s name correctly helps. Interestingly, a search for just “Web Hubbell” turns up a page about Chelsea’s paternity as the first result.
To: sam_paine
Here's the difference:
With Hillary some here have pointed out that there appears to be smoke which could be caused by a fire.
With Palin there is no smoke or fire but there are a bunch of liberal sociopaths screaming “Fire”.
There is no moral equivalency between the two. The critical difference is between discriminating thought and self-serving delusion.
The Liberal scum (repetitive) are doing nothing more than delving into their own perversions and leveling a baseless disgusting charge against one they wish to destroy. Their actions are the same as flinging out the question; "When did you stop beating your wife?"
To: txradioguy
You do know how to use Google, right?
To: 1rudeboy
You know exactly what he meant.
You’re just trying to be obtuse to avoid the accusation.
and unless he can provide some credible proof to back up this crap like links...names of posters etc...then he’s just flapping his gums for the sheer enjoyment of hearing them bump together.
107
posted on
09/01/2008 9:03:36 AM PDT
by
txradioguy
(Welcome Home Delta Company 3rd US INF The Old Guard Job Well Done!)
To: Question_Assumptions
lol - yeah...I made the mistake of misspelling his name at first, also.
To: sam_paine
You gotta admit that she looks a lot more like Hubb than Bill. Bill never released his medical records and has no other children. As far as I know there's no similar evidence in the Palin case. Besides, no one was trying to prevent Chelsea from running for office because of this.
109
posted on
09/01/2008 9:03:52 AM PDT
by
McGruff
("We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change that we seek." Huh?)
To: sam_paine
Somehow you feel the need for police. I don’t. It’s not a matter that needs enforcement. Just like there should be a difference between laws and morals. Enforcement of morals should be by shame (society) and not by policing (i.e. government). You’re not alone, and some conservatives share your views. Personally I don’t have that kind of authoritarian streak in me.
110
posted on
09/01/2008 9:04:58 AM PDT
by
RKV
(He who has the guns makes the rules)
To: sam_paine
Wow!!! Chelsea looks just like Webb Hubble! That’s amazing. I never noticed that before! Do you suppose....
111
posted on
09/01/2008 9:05:10 AM PDT
by
optiguy
(Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.----- Ronald Reagan)
To: txradioguy
Come off it. He used a collective "we," with an observation that is essentially correct.
He doesn't need to provide proof anymore than he needs to give you a foot massage.
To: txradioguy; Question_Assumptions
Well since you’ve been here 10 years surely you can produce links to what you claim. Right?Right! Here's the very first one google comes up with, for example.
To: yankeedame
"Daddy says happy birthday."
4 posted on
02/27/2008 5:49:46 AM PST by
Mr. Brightside ( Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1970504/posts)
To: Red Badger
Chelsea Clinton nee Hubbell?........
nee Foster
5 posted on
02/27/2008 5:49:49 AM PST by
Vaquero (" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
To: Puppage
Who has the Web Hubbell - Chelsea Clinton morphing gif?...........
6 posted on
02/27/2008 5:49:53 AM PST by
Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: Vaquero
No, have you seen the morphing video?......
7 posted on
02/27/2008 5:50:28 AM PST by
Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: yankeedame
113
posted on
09/01/2008 9:05:30 AM PDT
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: sam_paine
I have been reading Free Republic for years and the first time I had seen this was in last night's post. Freepers are not blameless when it comes to slamming their political opposition...but I have seen nothing here to compare to what I have seen on Kos and DU the last few days.
The moderators on this board do a pretty good job of closing the threads taken over by the tinfoil hat types...but it is good for the rest of us to remember to demand proof when we see outrageous statements on a FR thread.
To: sam_paine
RE: “How many times have we seen this photo on FR?”
Counting your post, one.
115
posted on
09/01/2008 9:08:24 AM PDT
by
Gil4
(If you do what is right eventually the polls will catch up to you)
To: Deb
I’m not making excuses for Kos and DU. Those people are despicable. My point, and I think sam_paine’s point, is that people here say some despicable things, too, and it makes us look bad when we tolerate the same sort of claims here.
To: txradioguy
Guess he figures he’s done his good dead (sic) for the day...accusing ALL of us of the heinous crime.If the house needs a little sweeping, what's so wrong with an honest man grabbing a broom?
117
posted on
09/01/2008 9:08:40 AM PDT
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: sam_paine
I never bought that particular argument anyway. The husband and wife in question were perfectly capable of having a child that ugly without any outside help whatsoever. Just look at them.
118
posted on
09/01/2008 9:10:24 AM PDT
by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What;'d I say?))
To: 1rudeboy
“He used a collective “we,” with an observation that is essentially correct.”
Got to disagree with you there, the “morph” and implied joke doesn't involve a nasty rumor about an innocent baby or the reputation of a 16 year old child. That’s as low as one can go.
119
posted on
09/01/2008 9:10:33 AM PDT
by
Melinda
To: Artemis Webb
Sorry, that is so lame.
I do not bear responsibility for the statements of idiots who happen to appear on this site.
Do you consider yourself to be a conservative? The mindset that you advocate is not one of common sense.
Keep workin’ it!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 241-256 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
