Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: org.whodat

So, if your child is playing in your yard, someone comes and scoops him up, and then drives away - you should be convicted of neglect? It’s the same logic you used. You should have kept your child in the house, right?

The cat was on the owner’s property. That should have been enough. Whether inside the house, on a balcony, or watching people in the yard, it doesn’t really matter, does it? Same goes for cars, trucks, people, whatever. If it’s on your property, other people shouldn’t take it.


41 posted on 08/31/2008 4:42:34 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr
Your animal should not be running lose, period, it does not know where your yard starts are stops. Whether someone took it are someone ran over it it is all the same, either one could happen.

And that has happened to children as well. And you used the term convicted of neglect not I. I said children have been removed for neglect.

42 posted on 08/31/2008 5:11:34 AM PDT by org.whodat (Republicans should support the SAM Walton business model, and then drill???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson