And she's Harvard-educated. There isn't a separate line for that?
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
What do you bet she is a DemonRat
2 posted on
08/29/2008 7:47:56 AM PDT by
Core_Conservative
(Proud to be "The self-righteous, gun-totin, military lovin, abortion-hatin, gay-loathin'...")
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Almost afraid to ask whether pics are needed...
3 posted on
08/29/2008 8:03:38 AM PDT by
JRios1968
(Never kick a leftist when they are down. Wait until they are halfway back up. You get more leverage!)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
What happened to feminists who insisted that going bra-less was “liberating” (no matter how obviously one needed a bra)? I guess the bra-burning crowd must be mostly in nursing homes by now, but they must be scratching their heads hard over this one.
Photos of Ms. Kates reveal that she needs to lose a few dozen pounds. She’d be healthier and wouldn’t need to regard a couple of minutes without a bra as a major imposition.
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Just because a passenger says they are wearing an underwire bra or they say they have a hip replacement thats metal ... we cant take the word of the passenger unfortunately, Melendez said.Right.
8 posted on
08/29/2008 8:54:08 AM PDT by
Glenn
(Free Venezuela!)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Two words: sports bra.
Some more words: After seeing pix of Ms. Kates, be afraid, be VERY afraid of seeing her WITHOUT A BRA! Think Helen Thomas in Playboy. (NO, NO, NO, please don’t post any pix of Helen Thomas, I beg you!)
She’s “Harvard educated” and “lived in Berkeley for 17 years”. Nuff said.
11 posted on
08/29/2008 9:36:26 AM PDT by
garyhope
(It's world war IV, right here, right now courtesy of Islam. VRWC. TWP.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson