[Southack]

Obama will be lucky to survive Hillary’s roll call vote tomorrow night.

[Old Sarge]

Snopes-lovers will appear and “debunk” this in 5... 4... 3... 2...

[A_Former_Democrat]

I’ve said for some time this election will be a referendum on HUSSEIN NObomba.

And yes, he will lose . . . because he’s a flake. A big-time flake.

And that goes for his wife, too.

[randog]

The flake has a genius for discovering solutions at perfect right angles to the ordinary world.

Added to my verbal portfolio.

[Bernard]

I agree; McCain will win by around 100 electoral votes. And along with that, I predict that the Republicans will regain a majority in the House of Representatives.

Regardless of who gets nominated for the VP spot, Obama's real running mate is Nancy Pelosi, and she is locking all her newly-elected moderate Democrats into an agenda that doesn't care about people who pay $4 per gallon for gas.

God blesses America, sometimes by making it very obvious who the clowns are.

[OCC]

Shhhshhhh.... wait until the nomination is final! Loose lips, cat out of the bag and all that stuff.

[StarFan]

Nice to read while Chuck Todd is saying in the background Obama’s internals dispute the Gallup Poll and they’re very confident with their findings. They’re boasting that after Hillary’s speech tonight he will gain the needed momentum.

[Beowulf9]

Hey, I’m thinking the same, although the darn pollsters keep saying he’s ahead of McCain.

On the other hand, saying he loses and McCain keeps to his word and only goes in for the four years, do you think we’ll see the Obama/Hillary spectacle all over again?

With apologies to those who haven’t thought of this yet and hate me for even suggesting such a thing could occur.

[BGHater]

Obama will lose as long as:
1)McCain does not pick a ProAbortion VP
2)McCain brings up Amnesty talk
3)Health reasons for McCain

Right now, it’s in the bag for McCain.

Keep in mind, the Clintons will be working in the background to stop Obaama so she can run in 2012.

[kingattax]

."leave barry alone !"

[Impy]

“The forces of reaction”? Does that mean us?

[Roccus]

IIRC, Rush said all this a couple of days ago. Now he may have been reading what Downs said, but I don't think so.

It's as if he's the product of a totally different evolutionary chain...

I remember thinking at the time that this line (which I love) was gonna get Rush in trouble.

[uncbob]

Barack Obama will lose because he is a flake. I'm using the term in its generally accepted sense. A flake is not only a screwup, but someone who truly excels in making bizarre errors and creating incredibly convoluted disasters.

So were Kerry ,Gore and Carter

[mojito]

Good old Hugh, one of those old school broadcasters, giving Obama a paddling like he was a school boy.

[GBA]

How long will it take before Hugh Downs is called out for being an racist?

[Christian4Bush]

bump for later

[Warhammer]

Additional evidence of flakery: Who in their right mind would have chosen Plagarizin’ Joe Biden as his running mate? Biden’s a treasury of non-PC verbal gaffes (as were played on Jon Gibson’s show yesterday).

Oh well, if birds of a feather flock together, I guess flakes can too, right?

[pipecorp]

[Redbob]

I take issue with his soft-soap approach to Jimmy Carter:
Carter WAS a career screw-up, a man who would have stayed in the Navy if they’d have had him, a man who would been Georgia governor for TWO terms except the people of that fair state wised up.
But most importantly, Carter was very likely the least-effective President who has ever sat in the Oval Office, one who, when he had not a clue as to how to remedy our national ennui, decided we should embrace it...

In a word: a fool!

[sionnsar]

The flake has a genius for discovering solutions at perfect right angles to the ordinary world.

A perfect description of Crazy Eddie, from the SF book The Mote In God's Eye (Niven & Pournelle)!