Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poverty and Welfare in America
The American Spectator ^ | 8/21/08 | Peter Ferrara

Posted on 08/21/2008 5:02:19 AM PDT by Renkluaf

Among those classified as poor, there is rapid turnover. Browning cites studies showing that 45% of the non-elderly poor in any year are not poor one year later. Within 3 years, 70% are no longer poor.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: poverty; upwardmobility
The passage above is from a book, Stealing From Each Other: How the Welfare State Robs Americans of Money and Spirit, by Edgar K. Browning, Professor of Economics at Texas A&M University. It highlights the falacity of the common argument on the left regarding the poor or the percentage of those who are poor. Capitalism is a dynamic process and at any point in time, we can segment its players into various strata. The critical element is, over time, how many who were in the bottom quintile or the fourth quintile are still there X-years later.

Maybe more importantly, it demonstrates that the argument from the left is straight from their beloved Karl Marx - we should all be "equal" at any point in time.

1 posted on 08/21/2008 5:02:19 AM PDT by Renkluaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Renkluaf

I’ve read this statistic before. The article was very interesting, and absolutely correct; welfare is essentially the cause of poverty, which is the direct result of simply not working.

It would be interesting to see what his solutions are (to be discussed in another article).


2 posted on 08/21/2008 5:23:24 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
welfare is essentially the cause of poverty,

Leftist relatives' heads explode when I say this.

which is the direct result of simply not working.

You can track income/wealth directly with number of hours worked per week. I think the stat that I saw said that those earning under 16k usually worked about 13-15 hours per week.

3 posted on 08/21/2008 5:31:48 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: livius

Oh, and to address your “solutions” interest:

Here it is:
He who will not work, nor shall he eat.
2 Thes 3:10

Incentives!


4 posted on 08/21/2008 5:33:56 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrB

“I think the stat that I saw said that those earning under 16k usually worked about 13-15 hours per week.”

Um, $7/hour X 40 Hours X 52 Weeks = $14,560 so I think your ‘stat’ is a little off.

“You can track income/wealth directly with number of hours worked per week.”

I think you can also track income/wealth directly with dollars per hour paid!
Poverty and low income isn’t always about laziness, and not all who end up poor are looking for welfare. Some people have to swallow their pride, or die. Why does it need to be so cut and dried to some, especially those who are fortunate enough to not ever be at the bottom?


5 posted on 09/04/2008 4:49:40 AM PDT by poeteyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MrB

“He who will not work, nor shall he eat.
2 Thes 3:10”
What about He who Cannot work?
What about children? Should we let them starve, also?


6 posted on 09/04/2008 8:02:09 AM PDT by poeteyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: poeteyes
What about He who Cannot work? What about children?

Addressed elsewhere.
I know where you're going, you don't want those who WILL NOT work to have consequences, so you bring up a diversion. STAY ON TOPIC. My bluntness towards the LAZY seems to have offended your sensibilities.

And yes, again, most poverty is caused by sloth, not by "fortune" or "luck".

7 posted on 09/04/2008 8:12:15 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MrB

MrB,
I know the difference between LAZY and incapable.
The only thing that offends me is when people quote the Bible while they are blindly judging others.


8 posted on 09/05/2008 7:38:57 AM PDT by poeteyes (The best way for a man to love his children? Love their Mother!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: poeteyes

Even the Devil can quote scripture.


9 posted on 09/18/2008 12:05:13 PM PDT by John Will
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson