To: Red Badger
what evidence do they have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the fire was as a result of the clubs event?Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is only needed in criminal cases. If (and I recognize this is a big "if") the AG can prove by a preponderance of the evidence that (1)they acted negligently, and (2) that their negligence started the fire, then yes, they should be liable.
To: Lurking Libertarian
But knowing Jerry Moonbeam and his minions I would not put it past them to manufacture evidence in cases such as these...............
13 posted on
08/20/2008 1:29:05 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(All that carbon in all that oil and coal was once in the atmosphere. We're just putting it back.....)
To: Lurking Libertarian
When is the AG going to start suing "gay" groups to recover the taxpayer subsidies for treating AIDS infected gays? The gay groups are promoting the behavior and the health care burden foisted on the taxpayers is astronomical. Perhaps that isn't "politically correct". Attacking gun clubs brings cheers from the lefties. It's more political grandstanding.
16 posted on
08/20/2008 1:34:04 PM PDT by
Myrddin
To: Lurking Libertarian
From the beginning it was broadcast that the fire was started because of firearms target practice. I just hope that the club has good liability insurance.
29 posted on
08/20/2008 2:41:42 PM PDT by
Enterprise
(Let all Democrats have a half vote. They deserve it!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson