Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain's Saddleback Grand Slam
humanevents.com ^ | 08/18/2008 | Jed Babbin

Posted on 08/18/2008 5:34:25 AM PDT by kellynla

Barack Obama bumped into something hard on Saturday night. The nuanced naif of Illinois preceded -- in Paris Hilton’s wonderful snark -- the “wrinkly white-haired dude” in Pastor Rick Warren’s civility summit and came up very short.

You can judge how well McCain did by the minimalist coverage in the media. The highlights reported here were virtually ignored in the Sunday papers.

McCain has never been better. His self deprecation, his humor, and his life story turned the back-to-back interviews into a conclusive demonstration that he is ready for the presidency and Obama isn’t.

McCain was energized, comfortable and quietly eloquent in explaining why his life proves the most important of qualities in a president: character and core beliefs. Obama -- consistently charming and shallow -- demonstrated neither of those qualities.

John McCain was a prisoner of the North Vietnamese for more than five years. Researching an article four years ago on John Kerry’s antiwar activities during many of those same years, I interviewed more than a half-dozen of McCain’s fellow POWs. Each of them, in much the same words, said “I wouldn’t be alive today but for the personal courage of John McCain.”

That courage was explained, calmly, by McCain when Warren asked him to describe the most difficult “gut-wrenching” decision in his life.

McCain answered, “It was long ago and far away in a prison camp in North Vietnam. My father was a high ranking admiral. The Vietnamese came and said that I could leave prison early. And we had a code of conduct that said you only leave by order of capture.

(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: babbin; debate; mccain; obama; saddleback
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: Don Corleone
4-F means that you are not physically fit to serve. You on the other hand seem to fit into Section -8!

He was 4-F click here

61 posted on 08/18/2008 9:20:27 AM PDT by meandog (please pray for future President McCain, day minus 130 and counting)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: rideharddiefast

Fine, vote for obammy.


62 posted on 08/18/2008 10:19:10 AM PDT by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
For the 1st five years after the war ended other Vets were hard to find but when Hollywood started to make movies about the war everything changed.They lied about us right from the start.One of the reasons Kerry was rejected by most Vets.We all knew pukes like him from our service.
63 posted on 08/18/2008 12:58:38 PM PDT by roofer13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: chopperman

“it was a matter of commitment, principal and honor.”

Some people wimp out and walk away from those things over a lot less than broken bones and the pain of torture and confinement. You can’t say its not hard to make that decision. McCain is a good man, but he’s still flesh and blood.


64 posted on 08/18/2008 3:20:02 PM PDT by WOSG (http://no-bama.blogspot.com/ - NObama, stop the Hype and Chains candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA

“Is this interview
going to translate into any vote for McCain that did not exist last week?”

There are millions of Americans who, thanks to the obamedia, are unaware of Obama’s pro-abort extremism. If this forum makes them more aware of McCain’s prolife stand and Obama’s lies and waffles and opposition to even protecting born-alive victims of abortion, then, yes, votes will change.

“I have never questioned that McCain would be a better option for America then Obama.
But did McCain do or say anything to convince Americans that he was the best choice available out there?”

Yes. Prolife, pro-school choice, pro-win-the-war-on-terror, and better on judges, taxes and family issues. Oh, and a straight-talking leaders not a fatuous empty suit windbag.

Simple logic: The 2 choices now are McCain and Obama.3rd party guys will not win, so anything other than a vote for McCain is a vote to not participate in the McCain v Obama race. One of the two will be President. If you know McCain would be better than Obama, then McCain is the best choice available at this time.

This forum proved that McCain is better than Obama.


65 posted on 08/18/2008 3:26:26 PM PDT by WOSG (http://no-bama.blogspot.com/ - NObama, stop the Hype and Chains candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist
I said the same thing. We have all grown to hate McCain for various reasons......but damn, he hit the ball out of the park in the Saddleback forum.......I'm still sitting here with my mouth open....

Most of John McCain's positions and voting record has been conservative. But because he catered to the media and talks up mostly on foreign policy, we rarely get to hear him say what he said in that forum.

It's great to see a Presidential candidate give straight-up conservative straight-talk answers to direct questions.

66 posted on 08/18/2008 3:32:20 PM PDT by WOSG (http://no-bama.blogspot.com/ - NObama, stop the Hype and Chains candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: rideharddiefast
Do not forget that McCain demanded that the United States stop looking our missing POWs and MIAs

That was Jesse Helms.

67 posted on 08/18/2008 3:55:56 PM PDT by MARTIAL MONK (I'm waiting for the POP! It's gonna be a BIG one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
He sounded great Saturday night, but they didn’t ask him about Campaign Finance reform, immigration or other issues where he stabbed conservatives in the back.

I disagree with McCain on all the issues you mentioned. But how did he stab conservatives in the back? As a senator, he has been very upfront about his position on these issues. And he voted the way he argued his position in public. He didn't sneak in a vote opposite to what he said in public. He has voted consistent with his public posture. I disagree with him on many important issues. But he didn't stab me in the back. He didn't represent himself as a strict conservative and then vote as a moderate. He represented himself as a moderate and voted as a moderate.

McCain was not my first choice as a candidate. He wasn't even my second or third choice. He was my last choice. But at this point he is the candidate of the Republican party. And he is a moderate on most issues. But he is a conservative on two important issues: defense and abortion.

Obama isn't even a moderate on issues. He is a left-wing radical. So I would like to ask you a question, a negative question: who do you think would do more damage to this country as president, Obama or McCain?

68 posted on 08/18/2008 4:54:48 PM PDT by stripes1776 ("That if gold rust, what shall iron do?" --Chaucer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson