Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

3 boys rescued after being locked inside gun safe at store
KSL Television ^ | 8.14.08 | Sarah Dallof

Posted on 08/15/2008 10:34:28 AM PDT by Dr. Zzyzx

August 14th, 2008 @ 11:24pm By Sarah Dallof

There were some tense moments inside a local sporting goods store when three boys playing around climbed inside a gun vault and their friend shut the door.

The vault had a fail-safe, a common combination that should open every lock in the store, but it didn't work.

Firefighters say the safe was 4 feet high, 4 feet wide and 2 feet deep, good for holding up to 45 guns, but not so good for three children. Fourteen-year-old Myan was all smiles as he left Dick's Sporting Goods, but earlier this evening he and two friends were in the tight spot, running out of oxygen.

"We went into the safe and we kinda closed the door, and it locked," Myan said.

His friends ran over to the clerks and told them they'd locked their friends in the safe. Store employees tried the safe's combination, one that was designed to open any vault in the store. It didn't work, so they called 911. Firefighters drilled holes in the safe while they decided how to proceed.

Scott Freitag, with the Salt Lake City Fire Department, said, "They took the pressurized air they use on their air packs and attached that and put that on the side of the safe so air was going through."

Myan says his mind was full of thoughts like, "What were you thinking? Are we gonna die? Stuff like that."

Firefighters weren't sure how thick the vault's steel was, so they were hesitant to use a saw. "They ended up using pneumatic air tools and actually cut the back of the safe off," Freitag said.

Tonight, Myan says he's grateful to those who rescued him and his friends, and he has this advice for anyone who thinks about climbing in a gun vault: "Don't do it. It's a bad idea, really bad."

Calls to Dick's Sporting Goods' corporate offices were not returned. No one locally would comment on why the combination didn't work.

Investigators will determine whether the children will get into any trouble.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; gunsafe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Sometimes teenagers ain't too bright. Glad they're safe and maybe a little brighter now.
1 posted on 08/15/2008 10:34:28 AM PDT by Dr. Zzyzx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx

We need background checks for safes.

‘cuz they’re not safe.


2 posted on 08/15/2008 10:37:29 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx

Who’s gonna pay for the safe?............


3 posted on 08/15/2008 10:37:52 AM PDT by Red Badger (All that carbon in all that oil and coal was once in the atmosphere. We're just putting it back.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx

Why didn’t the safe have a saftey lock!?!?!? /s


4 posted on 08/15/2008 10:42:20 AM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is an EVIL like no other, and must be ERADICATED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx

I can understand a kid 6 or 7 doing something like this, but 14?


5 posted on 08/15/2008 10:43:32 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx

“Store employees tried the safe’s combination, one that was designed to open any vault in the store. It didn’t work, so they called 911.”

I don’t think they entered the combination correctly. They probably got excited and just entered the numbers in without also including the correct number of turns needed between each number. That is assuming it was a combination lock. Might have been digital. I’m surprised no one bothered to call a locksmith.


6 posted on 08/15/2008 10:44:05 AM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx
Firefighters say the safe was 4 feet high, 4 feet wide and 2 feet deep, good for holding up to 45 guns, but not so good for three children.

Wow, those guys are really sharp.

7 posted on 08/15/2008 10:45:00 AM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"Who?s gonna pay for the safe?............"

The parents will probably sue the store and the manufacturer for pain and suffering, maintaining that the safe was an attractive nussance much like a backyard pool without a fence. (only half sarcasm)

8 posted on 08/15/2008 10:48:23 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Firefighters say the safe was 4 feet high, 4 feet wide and 2 feet deep, good for holding up to 45 guns, but not so good for three children.

I'd say it held them pretty darn good, no?.............

9 posted on 08/15/2008 10:51:11 AM PDT by Red Badger (All that carbon in all that oil and coal was once in the atmosphere. We're just putting it back.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx

Will the store send a bill to the kids’ parents for the cost of the safe that was destroyed? A gun-safe like that isn’t cheap; and the store has to scrap this one now because of the stupid irresponsible behavior of these kids.


10 posted on 08/15/2008 10:52:28 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx

Natural selection took a swipe at these three and missed.


11 posted on 08/15/2008 10:54:14 AM PDT by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I imagine they would still be in there if no one had bothered to get them out.

However, the sentence in question was poorly written as I do not expect that a firefighter actually said that or if he did say such a thing, he was joking. Thus the reporter should have indicated it was a joke by the firefighter.


12 posted on 08/15/2008 10:55:36 AM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx
From the article: "They ended up using pneumatic air tools and actually cut the back of the safe off,"

It's discouraging just how fast a person with the correct tools can get into the typical safe. They're really only good for keeping out amateurs.

13 posted on 08/15/2008 10:55:58 AM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
Negligence by the safe manufacturer, plain and simple. Safes should clearly come with air holes and maybe some built in oxygen dispensers. This kind of incident is entirely foreseeable.

Bet these kids think twice before putting a bug in a box with a couple holes poked in it.

14 posted on 08/15/2008 10:58:31 AM PDT by Defiant (The Dem's creed: There is no god named Allah, and Obama is his messenger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Who’s gonna pay for the safe?............”

You break it . . .


15 posted on 08/15/2008 10:58:32 AM PDT by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx
I refuse to use trigger locks. Instead, I keep my guns accessible and lock my kids in the safe.
16 posted on 08/15/2008 11:00:48 AM PDT by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

What do you expect from a journalism major? Good grammar?...........


17 posted on 08/15/2008 11:02:48 AM PDT by Red Badger (All that carbon in all that oil and coal was once in the atmosphere. We're just putting it back.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
Safes should clearly come with air holes and maybe some built in oxygen dispensers. This kind of incident is entirely foreseeable.

What about freezers and refridgerators? Should they be required to have airholes built in too?

18 posted on 08/15/2008 11:02:57 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember; Defiant
“What about freezers and refridgerators? Should they be required to have airholes built in too? “


I am pretty sure Defiant forgot to put the *Sarcasm* tag on.

19 posted on 08/15/2008 11:06:25 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
What about freezers and refridgerators? Should they be required to have airholes built in too?

I remember growing up in the '70's we were constantly warned about kid killers such as old refrigerators and blasting caps.

20 posted on 08/15/2008 11:07:38 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (National Enquirer - The paper of record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson