Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editorial: Stop using SWAT teams on civilians
Examiner ^ | 8/13/08

Posted on 08/13/2008 3:09:59 PM PDT by LibWhacker

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The violent assault on Berwyn Heights Mayor Cheye Calvo’s home late last month was certainly not the first bungled raid by a government SWAT team, but the bad publicity it generated should make it the last time these trigger-happy squads target innocent civilians.

Tracking a 32-pound package of marijuana that had been addressed to Calvo’s wife, Trinity Tomsic, Prince George’s sheriff’s deputies forcibly entered the mayor’s home on July 29 and killed his two dogs before handcuffing him and his mother-in-law.

But like so many other SWAT team raids across the country, this one turned out to be a big mistake. After reviewing the case, State’s Attorney Glenn Ivey acknowledged that the Calvos were victims of a multistate drug ring that used innocent people’s names and addresses to hide shipments of contraband drugs. But the mayor and his family were also victims of a home invasion by the SWAT team, based entirely on what turned out to be a false premise.

In a groundbreaking study in 2006, former Cato policy analyst Radley Balko documented a disturbing pattern of cases across the country in which innocent citizens were killed by armed-to-the-teeth SWAT teams who either acted on the basis of wrong information from an informant or stormed the wrong house by mistake. “One thing I’ve noticed while picking through the depressingly long list of botched drug raids: The cops always shoot the dog,” Balko noted. Sure enough in the local case, Mayor Calvo and his family lost their two beloved black Labrador retrievers, but it could easily have been his own life or that of a family member that was lost. An apologetic “oops” from the responsible officials just doesn’t cut it anymore.

Originally set up to handle volatile, high-risk situations involving snipers, hostage takers or prison escapees, militarized SWAT teams have been unleashed on civilians with predictably disastrous results — as the fatal shooting of unarmed optometrist Salvatore Culosi by a Fairfax County SWAT team two years ago illustrated all too well. Sending a SWAT team to arrest Culosi was excessive compared with his alleged crime of betting on football games.

By sending a SWAT team to Calvo’s home, the Prince George’s Sheriff’s Department made the same mistake, setting the stage for a violent confrontation that could easily have escalated into something far worse.

It’s long past time for law enforcement agencies to restrict SWAT teams for use only in situations where massive lethal force is their only remaining option.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: animalabuse; banglist; berwynheights; beserkcop; cheyecalvo; civilians; donutwatch; fourthamendemnt; jackbootedthugs; leo; lp; mayor; noknock; noknockraids; noknockwarrant; pgcounty; policestate; raids; rapeofliberty; suckstobeyoucitizen; swat; swatzis; waronswat; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-254 next last
To: Cyman
Can anyone tell me how many police officers lives, indeed suspects lives, have been saved utilizing their overwhelming force concept?

I would guess almost none.

Two LEO knocking on a door executing a search warrant used to be a simple event. They knock, tell the suspect they have a warrant and open the door. If trouble arises, then you call in SWAT

The problem is they want to preserve the drug evidence from being flushed. So they do a dynamic no knock entry, shoot the dogs, tazer grandma, handcuff your wife and children, toss your house, treat your family like criminals.

Oops, wrong address, bad informant, so sorry.

Better yet they find a small baggie of pot you and your wife smoke on weekends cause your idiot neighbor thinks your are dealing dope because you smoked a joint on the back porch over the weekend

61 posted on 08/13/2008 4:29:12 PM PDT by Popman (McCain as POTUS is odious, Obama as POTUS is unthinkable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

I guess not. Oh well.


62 posted on 08/13/2008 4:38:17 PM PDT by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Unknowing

I guess it just frightens me that the police have the full right to bust in my house and start blazing. An “Oops, we’re sorry” just doesn’t cut it, you know? Especially when they say it’s for a box of pot.

Disclaimer: I am not advocating drug use here. I am just thinking we have to find a better way to protect the citizens we are supposed to be protecting in the first place.


63 posted on 08/13/2008 4:39:44 PM PDT by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Czar

“The militarization of local law enforcement organizations is a big problem. We have more than enough Jack Booted Thugs at the federal level and we sure as hell neither need nor want them at the local level. It’s getting to the point that it’s hard to distinguish the locals from the Feds. Also, the locals seem to enjoy assuming the JBT role.”

Don’t worry.

After Obama nationalizes all the paramilitary police into a single force, you won’t have to bother trying to distinguish amongst them any more.

- John


64 posted on 08/13/2008 4:40:19 PM PDT by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Czar
This is a problem spinning out of control. It needs to be curbed. The best way to do that bis to make certain they don't get enough money to play JBT.

One vital reform is to put an end to the spoils system. The only reason podunk towns get these fancy units is that they get to execute property seizures WITHOUT DUE PROCESS, then keep the proceeds to spend on military toys. If all seizures were the result of due process and all fines went to charity, there would be no budget for excess.

65 posted on 08/13/2008 4:41:12 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
How ‘bout having cops stop calling the little people “civilians”?

They should be more honest and use the term "subjects of the Crown."

66 posted on 08/13/2008 4:44:06 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Fishrrman

re. your #64

If he does that, that is when it starts.


67 posted on 08/13/2008 4:45:17 PM PDT by wastedyears (Show me your precious darlings, and I will crush them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: BlazingArizona
They have an expression. "Little people."

I feel like Steve Martin. Let's get small.

68 posted on 08/13/2008 4:46:23 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Who would McQueeg rather have mad at him: You or the liberals? FREE LAZAMATAZ!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: uncbob; autumnraine

This is how liberals handle their “wars”.

The war on drugs changed from going after hardcore dealers to going after softer target.....citizens.

The war on crime changed from going after organized crime to disarming citizens.

The war on auto deaths changed from arresting drunk drivers to speeding cameras that generate revenue like a slot machine.

The war on lung cancer changed from warning labels to increased taxes and forcing smokers to stand 40 feet away from an outside door in the winter.

Every one of these “wars” were started by liberals and morphed into attacks on citizens.


69 posted on 08/13/2008 4:46:50 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

There was once a 22nd Amendment to the Constitution which decriminalized alcohol. While I am not advocating re-legalizing alcohol or any other DRUG, the 22nd Amendment did cut down on gangland crime. Too bad that we are so progressive now that we realize that history really does not repeat itself!

There’s got to be some kind of free-market solution to all of this violence. Too bad that I am not clever enough to devise such a solution.


70 posted on 08/13/2008 4:47:59 PM PDT by Unknowing (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Unknowing

Yeah, me either. I really go back and forth on this issue. But just wishing it would go away isn’t going to work either.


71 posted on 08/13/2008 4:50:31 PM PDT by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; All
Here's another account (of a different event, still in Maryland) that appeared on the "Maryland Shall Issue" web site:

Henry,

I don't know what they would have done had I not been at home. Or if my Wife had not opened the door. Let's face it, it's highly questionable if not criminal for them to have even besieged my home in the middle of the night because I legally purchased handgun ammunition. Who knows what they are capable of, given that rationale... In Practice, Police "ACT" then worry about legalities latter because of "Tunnel Vision". Usually they try to "settle" cases rather than set a legal precedent or admit guilt. I don't want money (my contact to NRA Attorney), I want then to STOP this practice and be held accountable for their actions.

If you want to "bust" people for legally buying handgun ammo when the State Police don't have a record of you owning any such caliber weapon, then make it illegal to do so (good luck). Don't send a Swat Team to a Law Abiding Citizen's Home at Midnight when they have not broken any laws! By all means share this info with "Shall Issue Inc." and you can use my name. I've already been told by Chris Contee (NRA Legal Counsel), that if they come back with or without a warrant, have them call him direct.

Thanks and lock your door.

Don Curtis

Hello Henry.

I just wanted your organization to know what Our State Police are up too. The incident below happened to me, a legal gun owner in La Plata, Maryland two nights ago (August 4, 2008 at 12:30 PM). Next time, they won't get in without a warrant. You live and you learn. Below, is the e-mail I sent to Mr. Chris Contee NRA, Chief Counsel at his request. I know I'm not an isolated incident so I hope your members keep their doors locked.

Dear Chris,

It was great to speak with you today by phone. Sorry but also glad you are so busy with our legislative matters. What would we do without you and the NRA?

As I told you by phone, my Wife and I were unfairly besieged late last night by the Maryland State Police. I have also relayed this occurrence to "Citizens Group for the right to keep and bear arms". I believe they are in Seattle Washington. Enclosed is my summation for your review. Good luck on your trip and safe travel.

Last night at 12:30 pm a MD State Police "Armed Response Team" showed up at our door. I was dead asleep, my Wife was laying some ceramic tile on our basement floor when our driveway alert went off several times. She looked at the camera monitor and screamed that Police in Assault gear were running up to our front door. That made me sit straight up from a dead sleep.

We thought they were there for my Brother in Law who had just been mailed Bench Warrants to our home, but he doesn't live here and he is already incarcerated, so my Wife opened the door for them. Then I heard one of them say he had some papers for me or needed to speak with me,so I got up to speak with them 6 or 7 officers in full assault vests, etc. and NO ONE in uniform. Four heavily armed police came into the house while at least two others walked around outside of our home.

One, began to talk to me asking me about the types of weapons I own. Remember now, I was just startled from a dead sleep and I kept asking why are you here, why do you want to know about my guns? Every gun I bought in Maryland I bought from a MD Dealer. Well this Trooper said that I had purchased a "large amount" of ammunition recently and wanted to know why. When I questioned why he was asking, then he changed his tune to what type of Handguns I had. I told him I just purchased my first handgun in Maryland last week, but had not even picked it up from the Store . He questioned me about other handguns I might own and I realized that he was "fishing" to match his list of my ammunition purchases with handguns that I owned. Then I told him about my C&R license that I had purchased 2 with that but was not required to register them with ST. Police. Moreover, I told him it was the MD. ST. Police who approved me as a "designated collector" so why are they here in storm trooper fashion at 12:30 pm maybe to kill me because I legally bought some handgun ammo? He told me that most of the ammo I purchased was for weapons that they had no record of me having registered so the "SYSTEM" Flagged me. Flagged me for what? Death, Harassment at midnight by 7 Storm Troopers?

I asked, "... does your system know that it is stupid to buy ammo with your own ID if your are going to do something illegal, Does your system know that I have a C&R and can buy weapons of various calibers without your knowledge, Does your system know that you yourselves registered me as a designated collector, who "collects" so it is not unusual for me to buy any type or manner of ammunition and finally, Does your system know that it is NOT illegal to purchase handgun ammunition in the State of Maryland whether or not you own that caliber handgun?"

The Trooper (plain clothes), had a list of ammo calibers that he referred to and I agreed, there's no secret that I bought the ammo, but so what? And I'm still not sure of the States definition of a "large amount". Look, I'm not outfitting a Militia, hate group, or giving it to someone who can't buy it, or even buy ammo for a stolen weapon I don't want to register. Any weapon I have every owned has either been purchased at a Gun Store or I personally knew the individual I bought it from and its origin. And, last time I looked it is not illegal to buy handgun ammo, even if you don't own the caliber weapon OR you don't own a weapon at all !! So unless the law is changed, Police cannot harass people who do so.

That being said, the young Trooper told me I "should" voluntarily register all my weapons or this would happen again... because the "system" flagged me. And another thing, he kept asking where I kept my weapons, in a safe? I never answered him and he asked me three separate times as to the locations of any weapons I might have. I got the distinct impression he wanted me to voluntarily let him see/inspect the handguns for the calibers I bought ammo for, but I was ready for that. No warrant, no see. I mean, I would hope you could trust the Police, but why should I let six or seven or so strangers know where I keep guns? If indeed I had the calibers he was inquiring about?

The point here though, is that Police came to my home without a warrant, dressed to kill, trying to intimidate me about something that is NOT illegal !! This was not an Interview it was an interrogation under duress.

Funny the last thing he said to me before leaving was "... Mr. Curtis, sorry to have HARASSED you, you have a good night." Now that struck me as an odd thing for a Police Officer to say, especially if he was justified in doing his job. The last thing I'll say was that Trooper was courteous and having worn the badge, he and the team were sent by someone else, they're just following orders. However, whoever sent them to my home at 12:30 at night left a very bad taste in my mouth and NO ONE IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES TO ME NOR DO I KNOW THEIR NAMES. But rest assured they WERE the Maryland State Police. Word has it that there is a Special "Firearms" squad within the State Police and they have been asking gun dealers to keep a log of people who purchase handgun and other regulated weapon ammunition by making them show ID and signing their name when purchasing ammunition (not required under Maryland Law). Their MVA / DMV information is put in the log by the FFL Dealer right beside the ammunition you buy. Then once a week they (Police) come back to the stores pick up the logs of ammunition purchases and as in my case, they are comparing handgun ammunition purchases against known handgun registration files. This practice was first started by the Howard County or Baltimore City Police (I believe), and the MD State Police adopted this tactic as well. Perhaps it works, some criminals are stupid enough to purchase ammunition with their own ID. I am not a criminal nor am I stupid, but I was duped into signing those ammunition logs, without the FFL Dealer advising me that it is NOT mandatory or disclosing the log's true purpose.In fact I was told that if 'you' refuse to sign this ammunition log, the Dealer will refuse the sale. I will NEVER buy ammunition from that Dealer again.

72 posted on 08/13/2008 4:51:08 PM PDT by Renfield (Turning apples into venison since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I bet you even believe that if dope was totally legal none of these people would ever show up at the dealer's door ready to kill him for his stash.

Well I surely have not ever heard of anyone showing up at someone's door to kill them for a bottle of wine or beer, which would be the same thing.

The bottom line is that anyone that supports or participates in these unconstitutional no-knock searches (and all of them are) is a traitor to this country and is also spitting on the graves of all those that have fought and died to protect this nation's constitution and its people.

Unfortunately, most of these traitors will not get what is coming to them until they meet their Maker.
73 posted on 08/13/2008 4:53:39 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Fishrrman
"After Obama nationalizes all the paramilitary police into a single force, you won’t have to bother trying to distinguish amongst them any more."

If he does, he'll get CWII in return.

74 posted on 08/13/2008 4:53:49 PM PDT by Czar ((Still Fed Up to the Teeth with Washington))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
The mother-in-law in the house saw them approaching the house and started screaming.

Just a group of armed guys in street clothes charging the house and she starts screaming. What was she thinking?

no really. I want to know.

75 posted on 08/13/2008 4:54:59 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (So there you have it : Eliza Dushku has made my naughty list for the year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BlazingArizona

You’re right about the property seizures. That should be the first thing we drive a stake through.


76 posted on 08/13/2008 4:55:44 PM PDT by Czar ((Still Fed Up to the Teeth with Washington))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
This was something that was talked about by a freepers on a earlier thread,That is prohibit local counties/towns from having SWAT teams and have only a “State SWAT” with very strict Rules of Engagement that could only be activated by the state Governor,

Would go a long way toward demilitarizing the local police in my opinion

77 posted on 08/13/2008 4:57:52 PM PDT by Charlespg (Peace= When we trod the ruins of Mecca and Medina under our infidel boots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Gene Lalor
Liz Michael is not going to like that one bit.
78 posted on 08/13/2008 4:58:15 PM PDT by An Old Man ("The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they suppress." Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

You are very correct in everything you said. More laws equal less rights for the law abiding citizens.


79 posted on 08/13/2008 5:00:24 PM PDT by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Unknowing
There’s got to be some kind of free-market solution to all of this violence.

Legalize drug use. You can use them recreationally all you want.

If you are caught posessing drugs and test positive while at work or in a motor vehicle, you go to a special prison on an island for 5 years.

On this island there are no cells. You get a decent room and 3 hots. In return, you work for a company making something.

Drugs are non-existent on this island. People are tested weekly or daily, whatever makes sense.

After 5 years you are released back to society.

Companies bid to host this manufacturing site where labor is free, but other costs must be borne by the company and made-up by selling the products manufactured.

Any criminal act on this island and you get sent to a real prison for the remainder of your sentence.

This is just a starting point for discussion.

80 posted on 08/13/2008 5:02:36 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-254 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson