Misspelled “tippling.”
What a load!
If Obama was really win the religious vote, he would be up by 15 points.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
This is good news...that means the support is soft and once they learn about Obama’s ultra liberal stands they’ll go for McCain.
Leaves it up to conservatives to get the word out on Obama.
This poll is pure garbage.....unless they refer to the “New” Age religion.
I attend Mass every Sunday, Novena and scripture study on Tuesday. This religious minded voter would not think of voting for Obama, the one who would let babies surviving abortions died from neglect.
Is Starbucks a church?
About the ResearchThis report is based upon telephone interviews conducted by The Barna Group with a random sample of 1003 adults selected from across the continental United States, age 18 and older, in August 2008. The maximum margin of sampling error associated with the aggregate sample is ±3.2 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. Minimal statistical weighting was used to calibrate the aggregate sample to known population percentages in relation to several key demographic variables.
"Born again Christians" are defined as people who said they have made a personal commitment to Jesus Christ that is still important in their life today and who also indicated they believe that when they die they will go to Heaven because they had confessed their sins and had accepted Jesus Christ as their savior. Respondents are not asked to describe themselves as "born again."
"Evangelicals" meet the born again criteria (described above) plus seven other conditions. Those include saying their faith is very important in their life today; believing they have a personal responsibility to share their religious beliefs about Christ with non-Christians; believing that Satan exists; believing that eternal salvation is possible only through grace, not works; believing that Jesus Christ lived a sinless life on earth; asserting that the Bible is accurate in all that it teaches; and describing God as the all-knowing, all-powerful, perfect deity who created the universe and still rules it today. Being classified as an evangelical is not dependent upon church attendance or the denominational affiliation of the church attended. Respondents were not asked to describe themselves as "evangelical."
Non-evangelical born again Christians meet the born again criteria described above, but not the evangelical criteria.
Notional Christians are those who consider themselves to be Christian but do not meet the born again criteria.
So, Barna was able to break down 19 faith groups by 1003 people? I would think the margin of error would be much higher than he claims. He clearly is way to impressed with his own analysis.
They can say they "believe" in God and call themselves religous minded.
Why do I doubt this?
LOL. They really expect us to believe this junk!
This man isn’t just pro-abortion, he is pro-partial birth abortion.
I don’t know that many pro-choicers who are ok with that procedure.
What a lie!
Only if...
Their “religion” supports abortion infanticide
Their “religion” holds that homosexuality is acceptable
Their “religion” says that the famil is what ever you define it to be.
Their “religion” holds no one accountable (especially Liberal Democrats”
Funny, a story posted not too far above this one says differently.
or the “Barna” group workks for “Barack”....anyway- here’s a thread with known polling firms which dispells the myth of the “Barna” group...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2061292/posts
I’m surprised the NYTimes hasn’t jumped in with the Globe on this.
They fabricate a lot of their “news” too.