Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/12/2008 5:05:19 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sidebar Moderator

I didn’t see this posted, please delete if it is a duplicate.


2 posted on 08/12/2008 5:06:14 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave ("McCain 2008- Because the other option would be unthinkable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Dave

Time to move blogs to non-US hosting.


3 posted on 08/12/2008 5:07:27 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ADemocratNoMore; advertising guy; aft_lizard; AJMaXx; Alice in Wonderland; american colleen; ...

Pinging all..


4 posted on 08/12/2008 5:08:52 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave ("McCain 2008- Because the other option would be unthinkable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Dave

impossible to control this beast. never happen


5 posted on 08/12/2008 5:09:57 PM PDT by devane617 (we are so screwed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Dave

Talking about this on WMAL this hour.

http://www.wmal.com/article.asp?id=632848


6 posted on 08/12/2008 5:10:20 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Dave

No,.. FCC Commissioner, a Return of Fairness Doctrine Would Silence Web Content!


8 posted on 08/12/2008 5:16:26 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Dave
I am completely blown away by this. This is in complete contraindication with the Bill Of Rights.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

9 posted on 08/12/2008 5:17:05 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Dave

I am sure that if Obama is elected with a Democratic House and Senate, and a Democrat majority on the Supreme Court, it will mean the fairness doctrine applied to all media: tv and radio, newspapers, books, pamphlets, the internet and even public speech. And to the Democrat rulers, the fairness doctrine will mean nothing may be stated but liberal ideology. The US will be like China, a totalitarian state with no individual rights. The only difference will be that China is becoming capitalist, while America will be an atheistic, Communist, Muslim state.


12 posted on 08/12/2008 5:21:47 PM PDT by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Dave

If Washington thought the Immigration Reform popular outburst was big, wait till they try to shove this one down our throats!


14 posted on 08/12/2008 5:32:11 PM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Dave; bamahead; ShadowAce

Wow!!!


16 posted on 08/12/2008 5:37:41 PM PDT by KoRn (CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KoRn; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...


Libertarian ping! To be added or removed freepmail me or post a message here.
20 posted on 08/12/2008 5:57:34 PM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Dave

The Fairness Doctrine is fine as long as it is applied to the school system, the colleges, all of the newspapers, public radio, and all of the TV news shows. Katie gets 15 minutes, then JimRob gets 15 minutes. Sissy Matthews gets 15 minutes, then I get 15 minutes.


22 posted on 08/12/2008 6:00:33 PM PDT by doug from upland (8 million views of HILLARY! UNCENSORED - put some ice on it, witch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Dave

How ANYONE could consider that the “Fairness Doctrine” is even remotely constitutional is beyond the universe of reasonable thought.


23 posted on 08/12/2008 6:05:41 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Dave

If B.O. gets in, it will be time for another ‘tea party’!


26 posted on 08/12/2008 6:18:16 PM PDT by G Larry (I'm investing in "Pitchfork Futures"!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Dave

There is more reason to expand the FCC to cover cable television than the internets.

Restricting political speech on the internet is just about censoring a contrary view to the liberal establishment. No allegations of illegal or seditious intent. Just an alternate media outlet to the fourth branch of government (run by and for the Democrats).


32 posted on 08/12/2008 6:32:07 PM PDT by weegee (Hi there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Dave

I guess I can see the value of the Fairness Doctrine in years gone past, when there were limited media outlets. Not that it worked then, either. But with the advent of the internet, cable’s 24 hour news, massive amounts of magazines and newspapers, there is absolutely no reason a person can’t get news coverage from every angle conceived by man. Not to mention...it’s not within the limits of the Constitution.

BUT..does that mean that conservatives will be able to post uncontested at Kos or DU? Does that mean that Rosie O’Donnell will be a guest on Rush? (ya gotta admit that could be humorous!)

Nah..didn’t think so...


37 posted on 08/12/2008 7:06:18 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

41 posted on 08/13/2008 5:29:09 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Dave

The Fairness doctrine would kill am radio and TV opinion shows.


43 posted on 08/13/2008 6:27:36 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Dave

Bull.

The basis of the fairness doctrine was first and foremost that odd notion of “the people’s airwaves.”

The “people” don’t have ownership of phone lines, satellites, and cables. Those are independently owned and operated.


44 posted on 08/13/2008 7:03:18 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Las Vegas Dave

btt


48 posted on 08/13/2008 7:58:33 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson